FanFooty Forum

AFL fantasy competitions => General Supercoach => Players & Trades in SC => Topic started by: Ringo on December 31, 2019, 02:14:20 PM

Title: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on December 31, 2019, 02:14:20 PM
Starting this topic for the coming year.

Temember to give reasons why selecting one over the other to assist.

There have been a couple of posts in the archive which I will quote here:

Quote from: elephants on Today at 10:10:39 AM

    Treloar. Tom Mitchell or Jack Macrae

Reply from Crowls
Macrea,  mitchell has to prove he is back to same level.  Treloar not at same level as either.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Hellopplz on January 01, 2020, 01:17:02 PM
I'd agree, safe bet is with Macrae after the last two seasons. Mitchell should be cheaper after the year out but does carry more risk and I'm the risk averse type :P.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dmac07 on January 07, 2020, 07:02:03 PM
Defenders:

Daniel & Laird

Vs

Williams & Sicily 
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RaisyDaisy on January 07, 2020, 08:27:32 PM
Defenders:

Daniel & Laird

Vs

Williams & Sicily

Daniels and Laird

You know what their roles will be and they rarely miss games
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Corkascrew on January 08, 2020, 11:46:41 AM
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on January 08, 2020, 01:57:42 PM
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)

Mitchell & Greenwood for me.
To be honest though that is 100% a toss up and could go either way.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dmac07 on January 09, 2020, 09:50:55 AM
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)

Mitchell & Greenwood for me.
To be honest though that is 100% a toss up and could go either way.

Close call, id go neale and smith. Though watch how both Mitchell and Smith look pre-season.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 09, 2020, 10:38:24 AM
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)

Mitchell & Greenwood for me.
To be honest though that is 100% a toss up and could go either way.

Close call, id go neale and smith. Though watch how both Mitchell and Smith look pre-season.

Neale and Smith and look to upgrade Mitchell in later.  2 x past keepers vs 1.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on January 21, 2020, 03:35:23 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Bones Bombers on January 21, 2020, 06:13:24 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.

*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: AaronKirk on January 21, 2020, 06:48:14 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.

*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!

Would IMO be a massive risk to start Titch at $631k. Unless he tears it to shreds in the practise matches I am not touching him.

Will be an upgrade option if he looks the goods in the early stages of the season.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on January 21, 2020, 10:28:35 PM
Ash/Anderson & Gawn
V
Yeo/Oliver & NicNat
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on January 21, 2020, 10:32:34 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.

*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!

Would IMO be a massive risk to start Titch at $631k. Unless he tears it to shreds in the practise matches I am not touching him.

Will be an upgrade option if he looks the goods in the early stages of the season.
with you on this ak.   for me it will be danger vs neale and cash will probably be the decider.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on January 22, 2020, 12:19:55 AM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.

*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!

Would IMO be a massive risk to start Titch at $631k. Unless he tears it to shreds in the practise matches I am not touching him.

Will be an upgrade option if he looks the goods in the early stages of the season.
with you on this ak.   for me it will be danger vs neale and cash will probably be the decider.

Thanks boys.

Titchell was the only risky pick I was taking apart from Doc, but everybody will start him. Even Nat Fyfe comes with risk. A full season outta him would be a first.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on January 22, 2020, 12:43:55 PM
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Money Shot on January 22, 2020, 04:02:17 PM
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
I like Coniglio and Laird. But like Olivier/Laird out of the above two.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Bluesman on January 22, 2020, 11:57:38 PM
Gawn/Jelwood/Doedee
vs
Jacobs/Zerrett/Sicily
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Bluesman on January 23, 2020, 12:04:48 AM
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
Oliver & Laird. I'm not a huge fan of Cogs with their plethora of midfield options
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Colley Dogs on January 25, 2020, 10:17:39 PM
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?

Oliver & Laird

(Because of Oliver)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Edgeovertherest on January 26, 2020, 12:17:37 AM
Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
 
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RaisyDaisy on January 26, 2020, 12:41:10 AM
Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
 
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1

Option 3: Macrae, Neale, Cripps, Danger, Oliver
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Edgeovertherest on January 26, 2020, 12:49:06 AM
Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
 
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1

Option 3: Macrae, Neale, Cripps, Danger, Oliver

Interesting... would like to know what you like about cripps, danger and oliver (macrae and neale I understand) vs Fyfe, Kelly, Dunkley and Titch. Injury worries maybe?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Southstorm on January 27, 2020, 03:05:30 PM
Titch has only just started running recently from what I gather and didn't take part in the match sim this week. Would not be planning for him round 1.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 29, 2020, 04:54:12 PM
Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on January 29, 2020, 06:31:11 PM
Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood
Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: eaglesman on January 29, 2020, 10:56:46 PM
Walters v heeney
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on January 30, 2020, 10:20:28 AM
Walters v heeney

I'm dealing with the same question. Right now I have Heeney, partly because of price. I am not at all confident this is the right decision!

I can't believe I'm saying it but Greene is worth a look for ~500k F3s too
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on January 30, 2020, 10:54:08 AM
Walters v heeney

I'm dealing with the same question. Right now I have Heeney, partly because of price. I am not at all confident this is the right decision!

I can't believe I'm saying it but Greene is worth a look for ~500k F3s too
I'd be going Greenwood ahead of those 3 personally.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 11:00:37 AM
Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood
Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.

Got Dev at F4 already.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on January 30, 2020, 12:49:10 PM
I'd be going Greenwood ahead of those 3 personally.

I don't love this one personally. Greenwood has averaged 85 in his three seasons and managed to break 100 three times last season. True that more time in the guts could help him but the upside surely isn't huge and I'd be predicting pretty close to 85 again.

Greene averaged 94, finishing last season with six straight 100s, two of which were over 130.

Heeney averaged 94, finishing last season with 5 100s from his last 9.

I'm going with if I remember Holz's theory that someone who scores well staying on the park is a better gamble than someone who scores less well lifting their numbers. Even if Greenwood adds 10ppg, he is just even with Greene and Heeney.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 01:02:37 PM
Quote
I'm going with if I remember Holz's theory that someone who scores well staying on the park is a better gamble than someone who scores less well lifting their numbers. Even if Greenwood adds 10ppg, he is just even with Greene and Heeney.

Gotta take into account what you can do with the extra money though.  Greene and Heeney require paying full price, if Greenwood does score on par with those guys then you are saving a tonne of cash.  Don't forget Greene misses games and Heeney tends to get small freak injuries that always make him a bit proppy.  Prefer Heeney and Greene as upgrade targets.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on January 30, 2020, 01:21:51 PM
Quote
I'm going with if I remember Holz's theory that someone who scores well staying on the park is a better gamble than someone who scores less well lifting their numbers. Even if Greenwood adds 10ppg, he is just even with Greene and Heeney.

Gotta take into account what you can do with the extra money though.  Greene and Heeney require paying full price, if Greenwood does score on par with those guys then you are saving a tonne of cash.  Don't forget Greene misses games and Heeney tends to get small freak injuries that always make him a bit proppy.  Prefer Heeney and Greene as upgrade targets.

Definitely agree about the risk on Greene. By starting him you're gambling on him staying on the park and his history is weak.

Not sure entirely that it matters much about Heeney's niggles. It's true that he gets them but his numbers stack up well to Greenwood's even with the niggles. If anything you're betting on him overcoming them and lifting his average.

I agree in theory about the cash, but you have to remember Greenwood is 465ish, which isn't really dirt cheap - we're talking about 50k or so less than Heeney/Greene. You can see Greenwood tipping 500 at various points but I wouldn't be surprised if he hovers around the 470 mark
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 01:42:09 PM
"Not sure entirely that it matters much about Heeney's niggles. It's true that he gets them but his numbers stack up well to Greenwood's even with the niggles. If anything you're betting on him overcoming them and lifting his average."

I do think Heeney will make another jump in production at some stage, could be this year, but can't go him over Whits and Dusty and having Heeney at F3 just messes with structure.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on January 30, 2020, 04:14:25 PM
I do think Heeney will make another jump in production at some stage, could be this year, but can't go him over Whits and Dusty and having Heeney at F3 just messes with structure.

The structure problem is real. I have those two and Heeney at f3 right now. I'm not comfortable with it. But I really don't like the fwd mid price options at all, and taking two fwd prems and rookies into rd 1 would be a big call.

With that said I have 4 def prems (including Doc) and Sauce in the ruck, which surely isn't the right structure either. Lots of drafts to come ahead of rd 1 yet!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 04:27:00 PM
Quote
With that said I have 4 def prems (including Doc) and Sauce in the ruck, which surely isn't the right structure either. Lots of drafts to come ahead of rd 1 yet!

There will be sacrifices somewhere whichever way you go.  4 defender premos is a lot, that tends to be the line that burns me the most when I pay up.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on January 31, 2020, 08:20:18 PM
Quote
With that said I have 4 def prems (including Doc) and Sauce in the ruck, which surely isn't the right structure either. Lots of drafts to come ahead of rd 1 yet!

There will be sacrifices somewhere whichever way you go.  4 defender premos is a lot, that tends to be the line that burns me the most when I pay up.
"burns me the most when I pay up"   wise words jv,  laird sicily and doc as much as i am willing to pay for def prem's.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dmac07 on February 05, 2020, 07:41:54 PM
J.Steven/D.Smith and  Roberton

V

Heeney and Rookie (Brander/Mclennan etc).
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on February 06, 2020, 01:14:38 PM
Laird(d)Bonar(f) v J Stephen(f)/Young(d)

Strengthens the depth of the backline with hill at D5.     Have Bonnar at F4 though.   
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: hawkboy80 on February 06, 2020, 02:21:22 PM
Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood
Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.

Got Dev at F4 already.
Neale & Steven depending what happens with the calf closer to Rd 1
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: hawkboy80 on February 06, 2020, 02:27:10 PM
Grundy & Brander (F6)  vs   English & D.Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: js19 on February 06, 2020, 02:41:45 PM
Grundy & Brander (F6)  vs   English & D.Smith

Grundy and donut if you have to... ;D
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on February 12, 2020, 07:50:45 PM
Lloyd vs Whitfield

Wanna start both, can only start one, but which one.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: walloo44 on February 12, 2020, 07:56:58 PM
Lloyd vs Whitfield

Wanna start both, can only start one, but which one.

I’d go Whitfield. Forwards seem to have very few options this year, wouldn’t not start one of the top forward locks.
Defenders there’s a few more options such as Sicily, laird, Houston, Stewart etc. so can get away without Lloyd and upgrade later without a huge risk.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on February 12, 2020, 11:07:18 PM
Lloyd vs Whitfield

Wanna start both, can only start one, but which one.

I’d go Whitfield. Forwards seem to have very few options this year, wouldn’t not start one of the top forward locks.
Defenders there’s a few more options such as Sicily, laird, Houston, Stewart etc. so can get away without Lloyd and upgrade later without a huge risk.

yep agree, thank you.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on February 13, 2020, 10:31:30 AM
Dan "Midfield Lock" Houston vs. Jordan Dawson
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on February 13, 2020, 10:40:49 AM
Dan "Midfield Lock" Houston vs. Jordan Dawson
Tough one, but I would say Houston just because of Wines missing a few weeks with Houston tipped to fill that spot.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on February 13, 2020, 11:33:42 AM
Coniglio v Zerrett v TKelly
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on February 13, 2020, 11:50:50 AM
Coniglio v Zerrett v TKelly

Conigs
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on February 13, 2020, 02:42:07 PM
Coniglio v Zerrett v TKelly
Id be saying Zerrett
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Mat0369 on February 13, 2020, 07:57:23 PM
Dan "Midfield Lock" Houston vs. Jordan Dawson

Neither
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: sidvicious on February 13, 2020, 09:52:00 PM
Jacobs and Hannebery vs Gawn and rookie under 150 k ( not pickett or cockortwo )
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on February 14, 2020, 09:46:32 AM
Jacobs and Hannebery vs Gawn and rookie under 150 k ( not pickett or cockortwo )
Gawn and rookie. 1 keeper vs none
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: walloo44 on February 14, 2020, 10:46:37 AM
Houston or Sicily
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on February 14, 2020, 10:51:36 AM
Houston or Sicily
Sicily
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on February 21, 2020, 02:47:00 PM
Houston or Sicily
Sicily
Based on risk v reward Sicily.  Proven scoring ability, plenty of fwd and def depth at Hawks to free him up for rebounding.    Houston has the potential to score same or outscore Sicily if he plays high mid TOG, so probably more upside to him.   Comes down to team balance and personal risk threshold.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on February 27, 2020, 10:17:52 PM
Final 2 Premo Mid Spot.
Titch vs. Oliver vs. TKelly

Rest of the mids are .... Crippa/Bonts/Neale/ ?? / ?? /Narkle/Rowell/Pickett (McHenry/Mead/Close)

If TKelly is chosen i can change Heeney to Whitfield which is bloody tempting
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: eaglesman on February 27, 2020, 10:31:54 PM
Final 2 Premo Mid Spot.
Titch vs. Oliver vs. TKelly

Rest of the mids are .... Crippa/Bonts/Neale/ ?? / ?? /Narkle/Rowell/Pickett (McHenry/Mead/Close)

If TKelly is chosen i can change Heeney to Whitfield which is bloody tempting

Titch.

Team won’t let Kelly run free. He was waltzing through packs and let go tonight.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: wizlad on February 27, 2020, 10:58:02 PM
sicily (D2) + hannebery (M5) + rookie (M8)
vs
Neale (M1) + 2 high rookies (D5, M7)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: eaglesman on February 27, 2020, 11:01:52 PM
sicily (D2) + hannebery (M5) + rookie (M8)
vs
Neale (M1) + 2 high rookies (D5, M7)

Neale
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Woppa15 on February 27, 2020, 11:26:50 PM
Houston or Sicily
Sicily
Based on risk v reward Sicily.  Proven scoring ability, plenty of fwd and def depth at Hawks to free him up for rebounding.    Houston has the potential to score same or outscore Sicily if he plays high mid TOG, so probably more upside to him.   Comes down to team balance and personal risk threshold.

I would say Sicily. I feel he has a higher ceiling and could go on a run and become unattainable quite quickly. Whereas Houston, while he may hit that 90 - 95 avg, I don’t see him having that same potential to hurt us If we don’t start him.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on February 27, 2020, 11:59:06 PM
Houston or Sicily

Houston for me. Sicily can't be trusted...I like the ceiling there but I absolutely hate the floor. The second Hawthorns forward line looks dysfunctional guess who's getting swung forward?

Plus he's a certainty to do something dumb and miss a couple of weeks.

I feel like Sicily can be had at sub 450k just like last year...
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on February 28, 2020, 09:32:52 PM
A) Whitfield & Serong
B) Greenwood & D. Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on March 01, 2020, 08:28:36 PM
Looking for a M6
Boak + $42k or Danger

Neale/Cripps/Titch/Bonts/Oliver as my other premiums
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RaisyDaisy on March 01, 2020, 08:31:21 PM
Looking for a M6
Boak + $42k or Danger

Neale/Cripps/Titch/Bonts/Oliver as my other premiums

Rowell

Surely your def or fwd is cooked if you go with 6 prem mids?

Otherwise, Danger > Boak
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on March 01, 2020, 10:18:54 PM
Looking for a M6
Boak + $42k or Danger

Neale/Cripps/Titch/Bonts/Oliver as my other premiums

Rowell

Surely your def or fwd is cooked if you go with 6 prem mids?

Otherwise, Danger > Boak

Got Rowell.

DEF: Sicily/Houston/Doch/Robbo
RUC: Grundy/Marshall
FWD: Dusty/Greenwood or McPherson/Dev Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: wizlad on March 01, 2020, 11:38:34 PM
BJ vs Xerri vs Cameron
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 02, 2020, 12:14:32 AM
BJ vs Xerri vs Cameron
I'd pick all of them if they are all named Rd. 1.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Thewizz71 on March 02, 2020, 07:16:52 AM
BJ vs Xerri vs Cameron
I'd pick all of them if they are all named Rd. 1.
One on each line  :D
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 02, 2020, 11:11:03 AM
BJ vs Xerri vs Cameron
I'd pick all of them if they are all named Rd. 1.
One on each line  :D

No mate. Surely as r1-r2-r3. Now that’s woke.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on March 02, 2020, 03:01:34 PM
Whitefield + Narkle vs. Danger + Dev Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on March 02, 2020, 04:03:09 PM
Whitefield + Narkle vs. Danger + Dev Smith

Whitfield and Narkle for me. Hope for de ja vue for Dangerfield and get him at $471k just like last year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on March 03, 2020, 01:56:31 PM
Whitefield + Narkle vs. Danger + Dev Smith

Whitfield and Narkle for me. Hope for de ja vue for Dangerfield and get him at $471k just like last year.
Agree with Frenzy
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 03, 2020, 05:50:11 PM
Greenwood + Houston vs. Whitfield + Dev
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: js19 on March 03, 2020, 06:10:59 PM
Greenwood + Houston vs. Whitfield + Dev

Greenwood + Houston for me, just. Only for the fact Dev might not be a keeper...

Got a similar quandary including him though:

Dunkley + Dev
Vs
Walters + Narkle?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on March 03, 2020, 06:33:21 PM
Greenwood + Houston vs. Whitfield + Dev

Greenwood + Houston for me, just. Only for the fact Dev might not be a keeper...

Got a similar quandary including him though:

Dunkley + Dev
Vs
Walters + Narkle?

Tough one this. Dunks and Devon could both have role issues and play fwd. and your paying full price for Walters, but I do like Narkle and am using him myself.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Woppa15 on March 04, 2020, 09:21:31 AM
@ D2 Houston or Dawson?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 04, 2020, 02:07:56 PM
@ D2 Houston or Dawson?

Has to be Dawson now with the news about Port/Saints having the standalone Round 11 bye.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 04, 2020, 04:21:03 PM
Noble or Bonar? Looking at getting Dawson in but wondering which one of these expensive rooks is better.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Colley Dogs on March 04, 2020, 11:54:54 PM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:

Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar

or

Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw

or

Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith

Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Money Shot on March 05, 2020, 06:36:39 AM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:

Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar

or

Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw

or

Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Laird, Macrae, Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on March 05, 2020, 10:49:15 AM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:

Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar

or

Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw

or

Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Laird, Macrae, Smith

+1
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on March 05, 2020, 08:26:13 PM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:

Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar

or

Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw

or

Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Laird, Macrae, Smith

+1
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Colley Dogs on March 05, 2020, 08:32:50 PM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:

Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar

or

Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw

or

Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Laird, Macrae, Smith

+1

Hearing you loud and clear. Thanks
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on March 06, 2020, 11:57:36 PM
Whitfield, Ceglar & Georgiadis
Or
Ceglar, Steven & D. Smith
Or
Whitfield, Steven/Smith & Bonar
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jbjimmyjb on March 06, 2020, 11:59:56 PM
Whitfield & Georgiadis
Or
Steven & D. Smith
Whitfield & Georgiadis.
Having both Dev and Steven is too risky imo, personally I'm running with Smith and waiting to see how he goes in Marsh 2.


M4 Bont vs Mitchell?
I've had Bont pencilled in since the first version of my team, but he's probably the mid I like least out of Macrae, Neale, Cripps and Oliver due to his forward time, and Titch looked great tonight.


Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on March 07, 2020, 12:03:02 AM
Whitfield & Georgiadis
Or
Steven & D. Smith
Whitfield & Georgiadis.
Having both Dev and Steven is too risky imo, personally I'm running with Smith and waiting to see how he goes in Marsh 2.

M4 Bont vs Mitchell

I've had Bont pencilled in since the first version of my team, but I don't want any of my starting 5 mids having even a slight chance of being played forward, and Beveridge has a tendency to stick Bont forward when things aren't working.

My other mids are Macrae, Neale, Cripps and Oliver.

I’ve changed mine up a little bit so give me some feedback with new options.

As for yours, I’m currently running with both Bont & Mitchell at that price. Same midfield as yours but Macrae out to allow for the other two. If you definitely want Macrae than Mitchell allows you not to double up on the Bulldogs.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Colley Dogs on March 07, 2020, 12:43:24 AM
For M11:

Sharp v Budarick

Who scores better?
Who has better job security?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 07, 2020, 10:18:19 AM
For M11:

Sharp v Budarick

Who scores better?
Who has better job security?

If both are named round 1, pick both. If they're both named and you're forced to only pick one, I'd go Budarick.



JKelly/Danger/Bont/Titch + Dev

vs.

Coniglio + MacPherson
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Colley Dogs on March 07, 2020, 01:10:29 PM
For M11:

Sharp v Budarick

Who scores better?
Who has better job security?

If both are named round 1, pick both. If they're both named and you're forced to only pick one, I'd go Budarick.



JKelly/Danger/Bont/Titch + Dev

vs.

Coniglio + MacPherson

Thanks for the input.

_______________

Regarding yours...

So difficult to call in isolation. I've been never been on the Dev Smith bandwagon, and have only had him in different versions of my team under duress! Instinctually I opt for Coniglio + MacPherson.

But I'm more interested in how this sits within the larger structure of your team. I've given my thoughts on your team page  :)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Money Shot on March 08, 2020, 08:21:40 AM
Dawson v Petracca

I think Dawson is a safe bet for 90 or so but Petracca really has the capability to push 100. In saying that is also more likely to go 85 or less.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RaisyDaisy on March 08, 2020, 08:27:55 AM
For M11:

Sharp v Budarick

Who scores better?
Who has better job security?


At this stage I doubt you'll get the choice - take anyone we can get! Definitely starting both if they get named, and can't see a scenario where I would only pick one and not the other

JKelly/Danger/Bont/Titch + Dev

vs.

Coniglio + MacPherson

Option 1, easily

Top 5 mid + Dev over a speculative mid and fwd

Dawson v Petracca

I think Dawson is a safe bet for 90 or so but Petracca really has the capability to push 100. In saying that is also more likely to go 85 or less.

I'm just not convinced with Petracca, so I'd go with Dawson - DPP might be helpful too.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 09, 2020, 07:16:00 PM
After the illuminating weekend "not really"

D.Smith v J.Steven v A.Brayshaw

I was pretty sold on what i have seen (and heard) on Brayshaw as a starting F3/F4. Lots of mid time with new coach Longmuir and set to be a possible breakout

Now Dev and Stephen have kicked my possible structure round with some pretty impressive SC scoring today
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 10, 2020, 12:15:50 PM
Whitfiled, Titch & Ash/Guthrie vs Ceglar, Conigs, Houston
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on March 10, 2020, 12:35:03 PM
After the illuminating weekend "not really"

D.Smith v J.Steven v A.Brayshaw

I was pretty sold on what i have seen (and heard) on Brayshaw as a starting F3/F4. Lots of mid time with new coach Longmuir and set to be a possible breakout

Now Dev and Stephen have kicked my possible structure round with some pretty impressive SC scoring today

All of the above...
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on March 10, 2020, 12:48:28 PM
Whitfiled, Titch & Ash/Guthrie vs Ceglar, Conigs, Houston

Option 1

Option 2 is just way too risky.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 10, 2020, 01:19:53 PM
Grundy v Gawn? No cop out answers of “both” either please.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Money Shot on March 10, 2020, 01:27:52 PM
Grundy v Gawn? No cop out answers of “both” either please.
Both ;)

But out of the two definitely Grundy.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 10, 2020, 01:46:03 PM
Whitfiled, Titch & Ash/Guthrie vs Ceglar, Conigs, Houston

Option 1

Option 2 is just way too risky.
Thanks LS, just thinking of having an extra premo in def, but agree with you and am sticking with option 1.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on March 10, 2020, 02:31:44 PM
Grundy v Gawn?

Gotta be Grundy!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dmac07 on March 10, 2020, 03:46:06 PM
Houston v Dawson v Crisp
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 10, 2020, 03:51:41 PM
Houston v Dawson v Crisp
Would say Houston out of the 3 purely because he's tipped to spend more time in the middle this year. In saying that, I haven't got any of them.

Roberton vs Cumming
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on March 10, 2020, 04:09:00 PM
Houston v Dawson v Crisp
Would say Houston out of the 3 purely because he's tipped to spend more time in the middle this year. In saying that, I haven't got any of them.

Roberton vs Cumming

Roberton 200%
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dmac07 on March 10, 2020, 05:06:09 PM
F3/D4

Parish/Dawson & Noble
V
Steven & Roberton
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Woppa15 on March 10, 2020, 10:32:26 PM
@D4 Roberton vs Noble...?
Needing to “cut some fat” in order to fit everyone in and this is one of my options.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 10, 2020, 10:39:19 PM
@D4 Roberton vs Noble...?
Needing to “cut some fat” in order to fit everyone in and this is one of my options.

Roberton's JS is much better than Nobles, but I think it depends on what that extra 45k unlocks for you.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 11, 2020, 09:32:29 AM
F3/D4

Parish/Dawson & Noble
V
Steven & Roberton
Toss a coin. Both have risks.  If Steven and Roberton can reach their previous levels then they are the obvious choice as both will be keepers. So is that risk worth taking if not go first one.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Woppa15 on March 11, 2020, 09:42:31 AM
@D4 Roberton vs Noble...?
Needing to “cut some fat” in order to fit everyone in and this is one of my options.

Roberton's JS is much better than Nobles, but I think it depends on what that extra 45k unlocks for you.

Thanks Integral. I thought about this a bit overnight and I think I’ll stick with Roberton. He was my original pick so gotta to with the gut. Also, I think I’m more comfortable picking the bloke who is an established player and has the scoring history with injury/health interruption the reason for his low price, I feel it’s far less risky and speculative then trying to pick the breakout player who doesn’t have the scoring history.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 11, 2020, 10:28:05 AM
Gawn+Greenwood+Roberton

Or

Jacobs+Walters+Hurn
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 11, 2020, 11:24:59 AM
Gawn+Greenwood+Roberton

Or

Jacobs+Walters+Hurn
1st option for me. Walters and Hurn overpriced for me and you should get them cheaper. Robbo is cheap and hard to pass up.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Pokerface on March 11, 2020, 08:06:24 PM
Sicily v McCluggage?

Prices the same, who scores more until the byes. Ignore structure, Houston goes in the other position.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Money Shot on March 11, 2020, 08:14:09 PM
Sicily v McCluggage?

Prices the same, who scores more until the byes. Ignore structure, Houston goes in the other position.
McClugage might our score him but Sicily much more likely to be top 10.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 11, 2020, 09:38:59 PM
Sicily v McCluggage?

Prices the same, who scores more until the byes. Ignore structure, Houston goes in the other position.
McClugage might our score him but Sicily much more likely to be top 10.
+1, Sicily will more likely be a keeper in his position but McCluggage will score more you would think
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Pokerface on March 11, 2020, 09:41:55 PM
Cheers Money, Wanderer. I tend to agree, though do I think McC is one of the sub 600s who could push for a top 10 this year. Hmm.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 11, 2020, 09:50:13 PM
Cheers Money, Wanderer. I tend to agree, though do I think McC is one of the sub 600s who could push for a top 10 this year. Hmm.
McC is more durable than some of the top 10 mids but the top 10 mids last year all averaged over 110. McC averaged 94 last year. The question is do you see him jumping 16 points in average this year? I'm guessing he could add another 10 points to his average which won't get him into top 10.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on March 11, 2020, 10:15:29 PM
Howe v Parish v Andy Brayshaw  for my last spot .(pending teams)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 12, 2020, 09:05:34 AM
Howe v Parish v Andy Brayshaw  for my last spot .(pending teams)
Parish for me
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 12, 2020, 09:18:14 AM
One I am considering

Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.

Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.

Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on March 12, 2020, 09:40:15 AM
Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.

Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.

I'm in a similar situation, though looking at Naismith instead of Jacobs. Whitfield v Gawn is an interesting one and right now I have Whitfield.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 12, 2020, 03:51:42 PM
Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.

Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.

I'm in a similar situation, though looking at Naismith instead of Jacobs. Whitfield v Gawn is an interesting one and right now I have Whitfield.
if its just whitfield v gawn, gawn wins easily, depends where you spend the cash when you have gawn. Gawn is a better sc captain and scored 917 more sc points than whitfield last year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on March 12, 2020, 04:20:46 PM
Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.

Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.

I'm in a similar situation, though looking at Naismith instead of Jacobs. Whitfield v Gawn is an interesting one and right now I have Whitfield.
if its just whitfield v gawn, gawn wins easily, depends where you spend the cash when you have gawn. Gawn is a better sc captain and scored 917 more sc points than whitfield last year.

That's right, I should have developed that a bit more. The money is used for better back and forward rookies. More importantly for me, there is a significant opportunity cost involved in fielding the third and fourth best forward rookies this year, rather than Whitfield and the third best rookie - in other words, Naismith on field looks a lot better than e.g. King or Georgiades, who I would have to play if I had Gawn in
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Hawker_08 on March 12, 2020, 05:48:00 PM
G'day Lads. Quick one:

DMac & Zerk-Thatcher vs Ceglar & Noble
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: sidvicious on March 12, 2020, 07:50:54 PM
G'day Lads. Quick one:

DMac & Zerk-Thatcher vs Ceglar & Noble
ceglar & noble if you need ruck cover
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on March 12, 2020, 07:59:12 PM
Neale & Oliver or Bonts & Titchell
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: sidvicious on March 12, 2020, 08:07:03 PM
Neale & Oliver or Bonts & Titchell
Bont & Tich had Oliver all last year never again . Although never say never in supercoach
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: timtim on March 13, 2020, 02:16:14 AM
Gawn vs Macrae?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: TexR74 on March 13, 2020, 10:11:41 PM
Gawn vs Macrae?
Macrae
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Rodi on March 15, 2020, 10:35:07 AM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 15, 2020, 12:51:34 PM
Dev Smith for me most upside if he stays healthy.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 15, 2020, 02:08:53 PM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
ABrayshaw
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 15, 2020, 02:10:22 PM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
ABrayshaw
Fitter, a few kgs of muscle on the frame, midtime minutes under a new coach
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: sidvicious on March 15, 2020, 04:43:47 PM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
Jack Steven
Lower starting price and higher scoring potential
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on March 15, 2020, 08:47:16 PM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
Jack Steven
Lower starting price and higher scoring potential
Of the 3 I think Steven, followed closely by Smith. Brayshaw a long was behind both of them.

Steven 7 of last 8 years over 80 average. including 3 over 100 and 5 over 90. Last year only played 7 games, but still hit 90+ in 3 of them. Risk for me onhim wasn't scoring, it was the job security and rest factor.

Brayshaw doesn't have the runs on the board, only gone over 80 in 7 of 39 games.

Smith I can make a case for, but its been done to death on here, so I wont repeat it all.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: timtim on March 15, 2020, 09:27:01 PM
I’d go with brayshaw and dev
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: timtim on March 15, 2020, 09:28:20 PM
Steven or Ceglar?

I have Naismith at R2
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Hawker_08 on March 15, 2020, 10:17:05 PM
Gawn & Mid Bench Rookie (Mahoney/Robertson) vs Naismith & Titch
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 16, 2020, 09:03:31 AM
Steven or Ceglar?

I have Naismith at R2
With Naismith at 2 I would go the added protection of Ceglar ensuring you have a R/f at R3
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 16, 2020, 09:07:40 AM
Gawn & Mid Bench Rookie (Mahoney/Robertson) vs Naismith & Titch
Hard one here Nismith say 75 average and Titch say 120 total 195 v Gawn say 130 so in front there but will be soundly dependent on how quick you can upgrade as both options have only one keeper.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 17, 2020, 12:46:44 PM
Roberton (D3)+ Noble (D4) + 133k (to be used elsewhere) v Houston (D3) + Greaves + $300. Have Zerk-Thatcher and Starcevich currently on the field aswell.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: TurtlesTerriers on March 17, 2020, 05:06:45 PM

Player                   Club   Pos            Price   Games   Mins   TOG%   Pts   PPM 100   Ave          1   2

Darcy MacPherson   GCS   Fwd/Mid   $443,800   2           213   86.2%   259   121.6   129.5   132   127
 or
Andrew Brayshaw   FRE   Fwd/Mid   $382,800   2           164   70.5%   196   119.5   98           94   102
or
Tom J. Lynch           RIC   Fwd           $388,800   1           110   90.5%   111   100.9   111              111

i like lynch given all the G games at home, but we all know about key fwds.
GCS as per another thread here, ??
so leaves me with brayshaw
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: whynot102 on March 17, 2020, 06:57:26 PM
Cogs or Yeo
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Pokerface on March 17, 2020, 09:13:47 PM

Player                   Club   Pos            Price   Games   Mins   TOG%   Pts   PPM 100   Ave          1   2

Darcy MacPherson   GCS   Fwd/Mid   $443,800   2           213   86.2%   259   121.6   129.5   132   127
 or
Andrew Brayshaw   FRE   Fwd/Mid   $382,800   2           164   70.5%   196   119.5   98           94   102
or
Tom J. Lynch           RIC   Fwd           $388,800   1           110   90.5%   111   100.9   111              111

i like lynch given all the G games at home, but we all know about key fwds.
GCS as per another thread here, ??
so leaves me with brayshaw

We don't know how many G games he has now.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 17, 2020, 11:35:38 PM
Cogs or Yeo
Good question... my M5 swings between these two. ..
I am going to review the proposed game schedule and who each plays and where. I have Cogs mainly because he has the captaincy now ... No other reason except that I expect him to respond positively to that
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Carn on March 18, 2020, 09:28:50 PM
A: McPherson & Houston
Or
B: Laird & Ceglar
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 18, 2020, 10:00:14 PM
A: McPherson & Houston
Or
B: Laird & Ceglar
Option B, plus let’s u have ruck cover
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 18, 2020, 11:33:30 PM
Roberton (D3)+ Noble (D4) + 133k (to be used elsewhere) v Houston (D3) + Greaves + $300. Have Zerk-Thatcher and Starcevich currently on the field aswell.
First option


Player                   Club   Pos            Price   Games   Mins   TOG%   Pts   PPM 100   Ave          1   2

Darcy MacPherson   GCS   Fwd/Mid   $443,800   2           213   86.2%   259   121.6   129.5   132   127
 or
Andrew Brayshaw   FRE   Fwd/Mid   $382,800   2           164   70.5%   196   119.5   98           94   102
or
Tom J. Lynch           RIC   Fwd           $388,800   1           110   90.5%   111   100.9   111              111

i like lynch given all the G games at home, but we all know about key fwds.
GCS as per another thread here, ??
so leaves me with brayshaw
DMac :-*

Cogs or Yeo
Cogs

A: McPherson & Houston
Or
B: Laird & Ceglar
A because DMac :-*
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 19, 2020, 09:41:08 AM
Cogs + Greenwood + And. Brayshaw vs. Titch + Whitfield + Rookie
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 19, 2020, 02:44:18 PM
Cogs + Greenwood + And. Brayshaw vs. Titch + Whitfield + Rookie

Prob option b for me. Get 2 essentially guaranteed keepers vs 1 keeper and 2 maybes.

1. Laird, Cogs, Naismith, Petracca
Vs
2. Sicily, Viney, Gawn, Cavarra
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 19, 2020, 04:31:03 PM
Another 2:

Laird and Josh Kelly
Vs
Sicily and Neale

Neale v Fyfe
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 19, 2020, 05:22:58 PM
Another 2:

Laird and Josh Kelly
Vs
Sicily and Neale

Neale v Fyfe
I have gone with Laird and Fyfe.


Walters + defensive rookie (D5) + 39k v Andrew Brayshaw, Noble + 112k left in bank.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: North Melbournes Finest on March 19, 2020, 07:21:36 PM
I've been wrestling with whether to get SPS in all pre-season. I wish he played one Marsh game so I could at least get one glimpse of his role this year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 19, 2020, 10:36:35 PM
Gawn + Roberton + Andrew Brayshaw v Nic Nat + Houston + Parish + 37.8k
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 19, 2020, 11:03:23 PM
Gawn + Roberton + Andrew Brayshaw v Nic Nat + Houston + Parish + 37.8k
Option 2 ...  no ...  Option 1
Can I have NN + Houston + Brayshaw ???
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 20, 2020, 12:29:55 PM
Stevens out so have taken a playing rook which now leaves me with $240K in the kitty
Question Do I "upgrade" Cogs?
Who from Macrae/JKelly/Bont/Danger or keep the money?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on March 20, 2020, 12:49:42 PM
Really struggling to pick two out of Bont, Macrae and Dunkley. help!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 20, 2020, 12:57:55 PM
Really struggling to pick two out of Bont, Macrae and Dunkley. help!
Bont and Macrae
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on March 20, 2020, 01:48:48 PM
Gawn (R2) + Rookie (M11) + $4k

or

Jacobs (R2) + Narkle (M6) + $73K
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 01:56:12 PM
Stevens out so have taken a playing rook which now leaves me with $240K in the kitty
Question Do I "upgrade" Cogs?
Who from Macrae/JKelly/Bont/Danger or keep the money?
Macrae
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 01:56:54 PM
Gawn (R2) + Rookie (M11) + $4k

or

Jacobs (R2) + Narkle (M6) + $73K
Option 1
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SydneyRox on March 20, 2020, 02:11:40 PM
Tyler Brown v Justin McInerny

Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SydneyRox on March 20, 2020, 02:13:31 PM
Really struggling to pick two out of Bont, Macrae and Dunkley. help!
Bont and Macrae

Bont and Kelly (Macrae if you want to though...)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: mjmmjm34 on March 20, 2020, 03:36:50 PM
Last mid:

McInerney v Noah Anderson v Ash?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 20, 2020, 03:51:33 PM
Assuming we don't get both Robertson and Starcevich today...

B. Smith + Cogs vs Howe + Mitchell?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on March 20, 2020, 04:09:32 PM
B. Smith + Cogs vs Howe + Mitchell?

I'm saying Smith + Cogs. It's slightly speculative, but Smith is set for good mid time and Cogs looks set to take another step this year. Mitchell a great pick imo but I have doubts on Howe
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Dmoney$ on March 20, 2020, 05:33:51 PM
Please pick 3 lads

Georgiadis
King
Curtis Taylor
Ben Davis
Sturt
Bedford
Ballenden
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: AN1611 on March 20, 2020, 05:43:10 PM
Bont vs Dunkley vs Danger?

Pls pick one
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2020, 05:47:36 PM
Bont vs Dunkley vs Danger?

Pls pick one
all solid picks.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on March 20, 2020, 05:49:25 PM
Bont vs Dunkley vs Danger?

Pls pick one
all solid picks.

I went Bont out of these three
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 20, 2020, 05:55:12 PM
Gawn and Schultz (F5)

Vs

English and Petracca/McPherson (F4)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on March 20, 2020, 06:00:40 PM
Davis vs Cavarra for F7?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 20, 2020, 06:14:13 PM
McInerney vs T Brown (Bench)

J Dawson vs Petracca (F4)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jfitty on March 20, 2020, 06:22:07 PM
Davis vs Cavarra for F7?

Cavarra

McInerney vs T Brown (Bench)

J Dawson vs Petracca (F4)

Brown and Petracca

How about Xerri, Comben or Conroy for R3??
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: ants on March 20, 2020, 06:33:51 PM
gawn+rookie vs ceglar+nic nat?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2020, 06:44:09 PM
Davis vs Cavarra for F7?

Cavarra

McInerney vs T Brown (Bench)

J Dawson vs Petracca (F4)

Brown and Petracca

How about Xerri, Comben or Conroy for R3??
Xerri

gawn+rookie vs ceglar+nic nat?
gawn + rookie
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2020, 06:45:38 PM
Mcasey v Zac Gutherie
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 06:51:30 PM
Mcasey v Zac Gutherie
Guthrie
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2020, 06:58:56 PM
Mcasey v Zac Gutherie
Guthrie
do you have a particular reason why you'd pick him? cause in the past when i have seen him he has been shower.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on March 20, 2020, 07:14:11 PM
Green and K Pickett
v.
Robertson and Schultz

First option better in some ways, but Green would be on the bench. Option two with Schultz on field seems more comfortable than K Pickett, and Robertson on field gives me M Pickett's score.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 07:20:49 PM
Mcasey v Zac Gutherie
Guthrie
do you have a particular reason why you'd pick him? cause in the past when i have seen him he has been shower.
Has a couple of years under his belt so should improve.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Grazz on March 20, 2020, 07:24:42 PM
Thatcher or Brander.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 07:24:50 PM
Titch vs Bont v Kelly
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 20, 2020, 07:25:05 PM
Bont vs Cogs & extra $80k for future trades
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 07:28:53 PM
Thatcher or Brander.
ZBT

Bont vs Cogs & extra $80k for future trades
Bont
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 20, 2020, 07:38:44 PM
Thatcher or Brander.
ZBT

Bont vs Cogs & extra $80k for future trades
Bont

How about Cogs and Fischer McAsey vs Bont and Williams
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 07:42:07 PM
Thatcher or Brander.
ZBT

Bont vs Cogs & extra $80k for future trades
Bont

How about Cogs and Fischer McAsey vs Bont and Williams
Bont and Williams
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: B. on March 21, 2020, 08:23:07 AM
Had a play around and tried to get more depth in my side and wanted to see what everyone thinks.

1. Gawn- T. Green (mid) - McAsey (def)
v
2. Naismith- Coniglio- Houston
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: js19 on March 21, 2020, 08:54:37 AM
Had a play around and tried to get more depth in my side and wanted to see what everyone thinks.

1. Gawn- T. Green (mid) - McAsey (def)
v
2. Naismith- Coniglio- Houston

Option 2 is around $250k more, so depends where that money is taken from...
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Judd Magic on March 21, 2020, 09:11:59 AM
Sicily or Houston?  ???
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 09:14:00 AM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 09:38:29 AM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 09:42:48 AM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: B. on March 21, 2020, 10:28:31 AM
Had a play around and tried to get more depth in my side and wanted to see what everyone thinks.

1. Gawn- T. Green (mid) - McAsey (def)
v
2. Naismith- Coniglio- Houston

Option 2 is around $250k more, so depends where that money is taken from...


Sorry was short on Cogs/Houston but flicking Gawn gave me both!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 12:01:05 PM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?

It all depends on Hurleys ability to score in a key position back role and he seems more susceptible to low scoring games than Houston who is playing more on the ball. Titch is better than Oliver and Danger IMO.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: js19 on March 21, 2020, 12:19:45 PM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?

It all depends on Hurleys ability to score in a key position back role and he seems more susceptible to low scoring games than Houston who is playing more on the ball. Titch is better than Oliver and Danger IMO.

Hurley is tempting though. Similar position to Howe - underpriced after a down year
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 12:29:40 PM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?

It all depends on Hurleys ability to score in a key position back role and he seems more susceptible to low scoring games than Houston who is playing more on the ball. Titch is better than Oliver and Danger IMO.

Hurley is tempting though. Similar position to Howe - underpriced after a down year

Hurley scored 43 and 116 in his two Marsh series. He can go big, but he can pull out the low scores. I haven't been watching the Bombers so I'm no expert, but isn't he the full back? I don't think Howe is locking down the key forwards. That would be Moore and Roughead, which leaves Howe more open to intercept, link up and drive the ball outside the back 50.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on March 21, 2020, 12:54:29 PM
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 21, 2020, 12:57:42 PM
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Davis
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 01:00:23 PM
Z.Guthrie vs Roberton?

Guthrie gives me the cash to get a higher priced rookie that is playing vs having a non-playing rookie like Williams.
I don't know anything about Guthrie JS but his Marsh scores weren't bad.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 01:02:05 PM
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Davis
It's a toss up between Davis and Georgiadis. Davis slightly cheaper but I went with Georgiadis because they are playing GC.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Slick5 on March 21, 2020, 01:03:18 PM
Sicily or Houston?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on March 21, 2020, 01:03:52 PM
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Davis
It's a toss up between Davis and Georgiadis. Davis slightly cheaper but I went with Georgiadis because they are playing GC.

Yeah i've decided to go with Georgiades as well..
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 01:18:27 PM
Sicily or Houston?
I went with Sicily because Hawks have more key position defenders this year, so you would think Sicily plays that sweeper role, the way Howe did last night, and it looks like a higher scoring role under the new format. If Houston didn't have a good finish last year I wouldn't even be considering him.
FWIW, Sicily first three games vs GCS/ADEL/NTH, Houston BRIS/FREO/COLL. I can see lots of intercept marks and link up plays out of the backline for Sicily to start the year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 21, 2020, 01:20:59 PM
Z.Guthrie vs Roberton?

Guthrie gives me the cash to get a higher priced rookie that is playing vs having a non-playing rookie like Williams.
I don't know anything about Guthrie JS but his Marsh scores weren't bad.
I have both and very unconvinced that either be worth it in the long-term. I'd probably get roberton as is way more likely to be a more reliable sc player. If possible i'd try and get cash from somewhere else.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 01:29:52 PM
Z.Guthrie vs Roberton?

Guthrie gives me the cash to get a higher priced rookie that is playing vs having a non-playing rookie like Williams.
I don't know anything about Guthrie JS but his Marsh scores weren't bad.
I have both and very unconvinced that either be worth it in the long-term. I'd probably get roberton as is way more likely to be a more reliable sc player. If possible i'd try and get cash from somewhere else.
The way I see it is Guthrie saves me 75K. If Guthrie can stay within 15 points average of Roberton, then it would be worth it. Lets say Roberton scores 80 average, you would think Guthrie could manage a 65. The only problem is I have no idea what Guthrie's JS is like.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on March 21, 2020, 01:37:14 PM
Sicily v Laird
Houston v Brodie Smith

Got a sneaky feeling Smith is going close to 100 this year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: North Melbournes Finest on March 21, 2020, 04:26:13 PM
Sicily v Laird
Houston v Brodie Smith

Got a sneaky feeling Smith is going close to 100 this year.
I would love Laird over Sicily, but I'm about $400 short and can't work out how to manage that. Laird and Houston.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: North Melbournes Finest on March 21, 2020, 04:41:49 PM
Sicily or Houston?