FanFooty Forum

AFL fantasy competitions => General Supercoach => Players & Trades in SC => Topic started by: Ringo on December 31, 2019, 02:14:20 PM

Title: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on December 31, 2019, 02:14:20 PM
Starting this topic for the coming year.

Temember to give reasons why selecting one over the other to assist.

There have been a couple of posts in the archive which I will quote here:

Quote from: elephants on Today at 10:10:39 AM

    Treloar. Tom Mitchell or Jack Macrae

Reply from Crowls
Macrea,  mitchell has to prove he is back to same level.  Treloar not at same level as either.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Hellopplz on January 01, 2020, 01:17:02 PM
I'd agree, safe bet is with Macrae after the last two seasons. Mitchell should be cheaper after the year out but does carry more risk and I'm the risk averse type :P.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dmac07 on January 07, 2020, 07:02:03 PM
Defenders:

Daniel & Laird

Vs

Williams & Sicily 
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RaisyDaisy on January 07, 2020, 08:27:32 PM
Defenders:

Daniel & Laird

Vs

Williams & Sicily

Daniels and Laird

You know what their roles will be and they rarely miss games
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Corkascrew on January 08, 2020, 11:46:41 AM
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on January 08, 2020, 01:57:42 PM
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)

Mitchell & Greenwood for me.
To be honest though that is 100% a toss up and could go either way.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dmac07 on January 09, 2020, 09:50:55 AM
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)

Mitchell & Greenwood for me.
To be honest though that is 100% a toss up and could go either way.

Close call, id go neale and smith. Though watch how both Mitchell and Smith look pre-season.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 09, 2020, 10:38:24 AM
tom mitchell(mid) & greenwood(fwd)
vs
lachie neale(mid) & dev smith(fwd)

Mitchell & Greenwood for me.
To be honest though that is 100% a toss up and could go either way.

Close call, id go neale and smith. Though watch how both Mitchell and Smith look pre-season.

Neale and Smith and look to upgrade Mitchell in later.  2 x past keepers vs 1.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on January 21, 2020, 03:35:23 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Bones Bombers on January 21, 2020, 06:13:24 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.

*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: AaronKirk on January 21, 2020, 06:48:14 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.

*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!

Would IMO be a massive risk to start Titch at $631k. Unless he tears it to shreds in the practise matches I am not touching him.

Will be an upgrade option if he looks the goods in the early stages of the season.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on January 21, 2020, 10:28:35 PM
Ash/Anderson & Gawn
V
Yeo/Oliver & NicNat
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on January 21, 2020, 10:32:34 PM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.

*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!

Would IMO be a massive risk to start Titch at $631k. Unless he tears it to shreds in the practise matches I am not touching him.

Will be an upgrade option if he looks the goods in the early stages of the season.
with you on this ak.   for me it will be danger vs neale and cash will probably be the decider.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on January 22, 2020, 12:19:55 AM
Titchell v Danger, so long as Titchell is fit.
Why take the risk starting Mitchell?
Have another look at Danger’s games played and average each of the last 8 years or so.
He has been very durable and although his scoring has dropped a little each of the last few years he is still right up with the best and has backed it up year after year.

*Please don’t make this year the outlier Danger!

Would IMO be a massive risk to start Titch at $631k. Unless he tears it to shreds in the practise matches I am not touching him.

Will be an upgrade option if he looks the goods in the early stages of the season.
with you on this ak.   for me it will be danger vs neale and cash will probably be the decider.

Thanks boys.

Titchell was the only risky pick I was taking apart from Doc, but everybody will start him. Even Nat Fyfe comes with risk. A full season outta him would be a first.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on January 22, 2020, 12:43:55 PM
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Money Shot on January 22, 2020, 04:02:17 PM
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
I like Coniglio and Laird. But like Olivier/Laird out of the above two.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Bluesman on January 22, 2020, 11:57:38 PM
Gawn/Jelwood/Doedee
vs
Jacobs/Zerrett/Sicily
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Bluesman on January 23, 2020, 12:04:48 AM
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
Oliver & Laird. I'm not a huge fan of Cogs with their plethora of midfield options
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Colley Dogs on January 25, 2020, 10:17:39 PM
Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?

Oliver & Laird

(Because of Oliver)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Edgeovertherest on January 26, 2020, 12:17:37 AM
Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
 
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RaisyDaisy on January 26, 2020, 12:41:10 AM
Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
 
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1

Option 3: Macrae, Neale, Cripps, Danger, Oliver
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Edgeovertherest on January 26, 2020, 12:49:06 AM
Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
 
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1

Option 3: Macrae, Neale, Cripps, Danger, Oliver

Interesting... would like to know what you like about cripps, danger and oliver (macrae and neale I understand) vs Fyfe, Kelly, Dunkley and Titch. Injury worries maybe?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Southstorm on January 27, 2020, 03:05:30 PM
Titch has only just started running recently from what I gather and didn't take part in the match sim this week. Would not be planning for him round 1.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 29, 2020, 04:54:12 PM
Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on January 29, 2020, 06:31:11 PM
Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood
Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: eaglesman on January 29, 2020, 10:56:46 PM
Walters v heeney
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on January 30, 2020, 10:20:28 AM
Walters v heeney

I'm dealing with the same question. Right now I have Heeney, partly because of price. I am not at all confident this is the right decision!

I can't believe I'm saying it but Greene is worth a look for ~500k F3s too
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on January 30, 2020, 10:54:08 AM
Walters v heeney

I'm dealing with the same question. Right now I have Heeney, partly because of price. I am not at all confident this is the right decision!

I can't believe I'm saying it but Greene is worth a look for ~500k F3s too
I'd be going Greenwood ahead of those 3 personally.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 11:00:37 AM
Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood
Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.

Got Dev at F4 already.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on January 30, 2020, 12:49:10 PM
I'd be going Greenwood ahead of those 3 personally.

I don't love this one personally. Greenwood has averaged 85 in his three seasons and managed to break 100 three times last season. True that more time in the guts could help him but the upside surely isn't huge and I'd be predicting pretty close to 85 again.

Greene averaged 94, finishing last season with six straight 100s, two of which were over 130.

Heeney averaged 94, finishing last season with 5 100s from his last 9.

I'm going with if I remember Holz's theory that someone who scores well staying on the park is a better gamble than someone who scores less well lifting their numbers. Even if Greenwood adds 10ppg, he is just even with Greene and Heeney.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 01:02:37 PM
Quote
I'm going with if I remember Holz's theory that someone who scores well staying on the park is a better gamble than someone who scores less well lifting their numbers. Even if Greenwood adds 10ppg, he is just even with Greene and Heeney.

Gotta take into account what you can do with the extra money though.  Greene and Heeney require paying full price, if Greenwood does score on par with those guys then you are saving a tonne of cash.  Don't forget Greene misses games and Heeney tends to get small freak injuries that always make him a bit proppy.  Prefer Heeney and Greene as upgrade targets.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on January 30, 2020, 01:21:51 PM
Quote
I'm going with if I remember Holz's theory that someone who scores well staying on the park is a better gamble than someone who scores less well lifting their numbers. Even if Greenwood adds 10ppg, he is just even with Greene and Heeney.

Gotta take into account what you can do with the extra money though.  Greene and Heeney require paying full price, if Greenwood does score on par with those guys then you are saving a tonne of cash.  Don't forget Greene misses games and Heeney tends to get small freak injuries that always make him a bit proppy.  Prefer Heeney and Greene as upgrade targets.

Definitely agree about the risk on Greene. By starting him you're gambling on him staying on the park and his history is weak.

Not sure entirely that it matters much about Heeney's niggles. It's true that he gets them but his numbers stack up well to Greenwood's even with the niggles. If anything you're betting on him overcoming them and lifting his average.

I agree in theory about the cash, but you have to remember Greenwood is 465ish, which isn't really dirt cheap - we're talking about 50k or so less than Heeney/Greene. You can see Greenwood tipping 500 at various points but I wouldn't be surprised if he hovers around the 470 mark
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 01:42:09 PM
"Not sure entirely that it matters much about Heeney's niggles. It's true that he gets them but his numbers stack up well to Greenwood's even with the niggles. If anything you're betting on him overcoming them and lifting his average."

I do think Heeney will make another jump in production at some stage, could be this year, but can't go him over Whits and Dusty and having Heeney at F3 just messes with structure.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on January 30, 2020, 04:14:25 PM
I do think Heeney will make another jump in production at some stage, could be this year, but can't go him over Whits and Dusty and having Heeney at F3 just messes with structure.

The structure problem is real. I have those two and Heeney at f3 right now. I'm not comfortable with it. But I really don't like the fwd mid price options at all, and taking two fwd prems and rookies into rd 1 would be a big call.

With that said I have 4 def prems (including Doc) and Sauce in the ruck, which surely isn't the right structure either. Lots of drafts to come ahead of rd 1 yet!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on January 30, 2020, 04:27:00 PM
Quote
With that said I have 4 def prems (including Doc) and Sauce in the ruck, which surely isn't the right structure either. Lots of drafts to come ahead of rd 1 yet!

There will be sacrifices somewhere whichever way you go.  4 defender premos is a lot, that tends to be the line that burns me the most when I pay up.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on January 31, 2020, 08:20:18 PM
Quote
With that said I have 4 def prems (including Doc) and Sauce in the ruck, which surely isn't the right structure either. Lots of drafts to come ahead of rd 1 yet!

There will be sacrifices somewhere whichever way you go.  4 defender premos is a lot, that tends to be the line that burns me the most when I pay up.
"burns me the most when I pay up"   wise words jv,  laird sicily and doc as much as i am willing to pay for def prem's.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dmac07 on February 05, 2020, 07:41:54 PM
J.Steven/D.Smith and  Roberton

V

Heeney and Rookie (Brander/Mclennan etc).
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on February 06, 2020, 01:14:38 PM
Laird(d)Bonar(f) v J Stephen(f)/Young(d)

Strengthens the depth of the backline with hill at D5.     Have Bonnar at F4 though.   
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: hawkboy80 on February 06, 2020, 02:21:22 PM
Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood
Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.

Got Dev at F4 already.
Neale & Steven depending what happens with the calf closer to Rd 1
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: hawkboy80 on February 06, 2020, 02:27:10 PM
Grundy & Brander (F6)  vs   English & D.Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: js19 on February 06, 2020, 02:41:45 PM
Grundy & Brander (F6)  vs   English & D.Smith

Grundy and donut if you have to... ;D
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on February 12, 2020, 07:50:45 PM
Lloyd vs Whitfield

Wanna start both, can only start one, but which one.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: walloo44 on February 12, 2020, 07:56:58 PM
Lloyd vs Whitfield

Wanna start both, can only start one, but which one.

I’d go Whitfield. Forwards seem to have very few options this year, wouldn’t not start one of the top forward locks.
Defenders there’s a few more options such as Sicily, laird, Houston, Stewart etc. so can get away without Lloyd and upgrade later without a huge risk.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on February 12, 2020, 11:07:18 PM
Lloyd vs Whitfield

Wanna start both, can only start one, but which one.

I’d go Whitfield. Forwards seem to have very few options this year, wouldn’t not start one of the top forward locks.
Defenders there’s a few more options such as Sicily, laird, Houston, Stewart etc. so can get away without Lloyd and upgrade later without a huge risk.

yep agree, thank you.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on February 13, 2020, 10:31:30 AM
Dan "Midfield Lock" Houston vs. Jordan Dawson
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on February 13, 2020, 10:40:49 AM
Dan "Midfield Lock" Houston vs. Jordan Dawson
Tough one, but I would say Houston just because of Wines missing a few weeks with Houston tipped to fill that spot.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on February 13, 2020, 11:33:42 AM
Coniglio v Zerrett v TKelly
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on February 13, 2020, 11:50:50 AM
Coniglio v Zerrett v TKelly

Conigs
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on February 13, 2020, 02:42:07 PM
Coniglio v Zerrett v TKelly
Id be saying Zerrett
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Mat0369 on February 13, 2020, 07:57:23 PM
Dan "Midfield Lock" Houston vs. Jordan Dawson

Neither
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: sidvicious on February 13, 2020, 09:52:00 PM
Jacobs and Hannebery vs Gawn and rookie under 150 k ( not pickett or cockortwo )
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on February 14, 2020, 09:46:32 AM
Jacobs and Hannebery vs Gawn and rookie under 150 k ( not pickett or cockortwo )
Gawn and rookie. 1 keeper vs none
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: walloo44 on February 14, 2020, 10:46:37 AM
Houston or Sicily
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on February 14, 2020, 10:51:36 AM
Houston or Sicily
Sicily
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on February 21, 2020, 02:47:00 PM
Houston or Sicily
Sicily
Based on risk v reward Sicily.  Proven scoring ability, plenty of fwd and def depth at Hawks to free him up for rebounding.    Houston has the potential to score same or outscore Sicily if he plays high mid TOG, so probably more upside to him.   Comes down to team balance and personal risk threshold.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on February 27, 2020, 10:17:52 PM
Final 2 Premo Mid Spot.
Titch vs. Oliver vs. TKelly

Rest of the mids are .... Crippa/Bonts/Neale/ ?? / ?? /Narkle/Rowell/Pickett (McHenry/Mead/Close)

If TKelly is chosen i can change Heeney to Whitfield which is bloody tempting
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: eaglesman on February 27, 2020, 10:31:54 PM
Final 2 Premo Mid Spot.
Titch vs. Oliver vs. TKelly

Rest of the mids are .... Crippa/Bonts/Neale/ ?? / ?? /Narkle/Rowell/Pickett (McHenry/Mead/Close)

If TKelly is chosen i can change Heeney to Whitfield which is bloody tempting

Titch.

Team won’t let Kelly run free. He was waltzing through packs and let go tonight.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: wizlad on February 27, 2020, 10:58:02 PM
sicily (D2) + hannebery (M5) + rookie (M8)
vs
Neale (M1) + 2 high rookies (D5, M7)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: eaglesman on February 27, 2020, 11:01:52 PM
sicily (D2) + hannebery (M5) + rookie (M8)
vs
Neale (M1) + 2 high rookies (D5, M7)

Neale
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Woppa15 on February 27, 2020, 11:26:50 PM
Houston or Sicily
Sicily
Based on risk v reward Sicily.  Proven scoring ability, plenty of fwd and def depth at Hawks to free him up for rebounding.    Houston has the potential to score same or outscore Sicily if he plays high mid TOG, so probably more upside to him.   Comes down to team balance and personal risk threshold.

I would say Sicily. I feel he has a higher ceiling and could go on a run and become unattainable quite quickly. Whereas Houston, while he may hit that 90 - 95 avg, I don’t see him having that same potential to hurt us If we don’t start him.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on February 27, 2020, 11:59:06 PM
Houston or Sicily

Houston for me. Sicily can't be trusted...I like the ceiling there but I absolutely hate the floor. The second Hawthorns forward line looks dysfunctional guess who's getting swung forward?

Plus he's a certainty to do something dumb and miss a couple of weeks.

I feel like Sicily can be had at sub 450k just like last year...
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on February 28, 2020, 09:32:52 PM
A) Whitfield & Serong
B) Greenwood & D. Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on March 01, 2020, 08:28:36 PM
Looking for a M6
Boak + $42k or Danger

Neale/Cripps/Titch/Bonts/Oliver as my other premiums
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RaisyDaisy on March 01, 2020, 08:31:21 PM
Looking for a M6
Boak + $42k or Danger

Neale/Cripps/Titch/Bonts/Oliver as my other premiums

Rowell

Surely your def or fwd is cooked if you go with 6 prem mids?

Otherwise, Danger > Boak
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on March 01, 2020, 10:18:54 PM
Looking for a M6
Boak + $42k or Danger

Neale/Cripps/Titch/Bonts/Oliver as my other premiums

Rowell

Surely your def or fwd is cooked if you go with 6 prem mids?

Otherwise, Danger > Boak

Got Rowell.

DEF: Sicily/Houston/Doch/Robbo
RUC: Grundy/Marshall
FWD: Dusty/Greenwood or McPherson/Dev Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: wizlad on March 01, 2020, 11:38:34 PM
BJ vs Xerri vs Cameron
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 02, 2020, 12:14:32 AM
BJ vs Xerri vs Cameron
I'd pick all of them if they are all named Rd. 1.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Thewizz71 on March 02, 2020, 07:16:52 AM
BJ vs Xerri vs Cameron
I'd pick all of them if they are all named Rd. 1.
One on each line  :D
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 02, 2020, 11:11:03 AM
BJ vs Xerri vs Cameron
I'd pick all of them if they are all named Rd. 1.
One on each line  :D

No mate. Surely as r1-r2-r3. Now that’s woke.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on March 02, 2020, 03:01:34 PM
Whitefield + Narkle vs. Danger + Dev Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on March 02, 2020, 04:03:09 PM
Whitefield + Narkle vs. Danger + Dev Smith

Whitfield and Narkle for me. Hope for de ja vue for Dangerfield and get him at $471k just like last year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on March 03, 2020, 01:56:31 PM
Whitefield + Narkle vs. Danger + Dev Smith

Whitfield and Narkle for me. Hope for de ja vue for Dangerfield and get him at $471k just like last year.
Agree with Frenzy
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 03, 2020, 05:50:11 PM
Greenwood + Houston vs. Whitfield + Dev
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: js19 on March 03, 2020, 06:10:59 PM
Greenwood + Houston vs. Whitfield + Dev

Greenwood + Houston for me, just. Only for the fact Dev might not be a keeper...

Got a similar quandary including him though:

Dunkley + Dev
Vs
Walters + Narkle?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on March 03, 2020, 06:33:21 PM
Greenwood + Houston vs. Whitfield + Dev

Greenwood + Houston for me, just. Only for the fact Dev might not be a keeper...

Got a similar quandary including him though:

Dunkley + Dev
Vs
Walters + Narkle?

Tough one this. Dunks and Devon could both have role issues and play fwd. and your paying full price for Walters, but I do like Narkle and am using him myself.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Woppa15 on March 04, 2020, 09:21:31 AM
@ D2 Houston or Dawson?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 04, 2020, 02:07:56 PM
@ D2 Houston or Dawson?

Has to be Dawson now with the news about Port/Saints having the standalone Round 11 bye.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 04, 2020, 04:21:03 PM
Noble or Bonar? Looking at getting Dawson in but wondering which one of these expensive rooks is better.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Colley Dogs on March 04, 2020, 11:54:54 PM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:

Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar

or

Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw

or

Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith

Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Money Shot on March 05, 2020, 06:36:39 AM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:

Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar

or

Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw

or

Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Laird, Macrae, Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on March 05, 2020, 10:49:15 AM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:

Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar

or

Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw

or

Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Laird, Macrae, Smith

+1
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on March 05, 2020, 08:26:13 PM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:

Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar

or

Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw

or

Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Laird, Macrae, Smith

+1
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Colley Dogs on March 05, 2020, 08:32:50 PM
D1 v Midfield ultra-premium v F4:

Laird + Dangerfield + Ceglar

or

Laird + Macrae + Brayshaw

or

Lloyd + Neale + Dev Smith
Laird, Macrae, Smith

+1

Hearing you loud and clear. Thanks
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on March 06, 2020, 11:57:36 PM
Whitfield, Ceglar & Georgiadis
Or
Ceglar, Steven & D. Smith
Or
Whitfield, Steven/Smith & Bonar
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jbjimmyjb on March 06, 2020, 11:59:56 PM
Whitfield & Georgiadis
Or
Steven & D. Smith
Whitfield & Georgiadis.
Having both Dev and Steven is too risky imo, personally I'm running with Smith and waiting to see how he goes in Marsh 2.


M4 Bont vs Mitchell?
I've had Bont pencilled in since the first version of my team, but he's probably the mid I like least out of Macrae, Neale, Cripps and Oliver due to his forward time, and Titch looked great tonight.


Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on March 07, 2020, 12:03:02 AM
Whitfield & Georgiadis
Or
Steven & D. Smith
Whitfield & Georgiadis.
Having both Dev and Steven is too risky imo, personally I'm running with Smith and waiting to see how he goes in Marsh 2.

M4 Bont vs Mitchell

I've had Bont pencilled in since the first version of my team, but I don't want any of my starting 5 mids having even a slight chance of being played forward, and Beveridge has a tendency to stick Bont forward when things aren't working.

My other mids are Macrae, Neale, Cripps and Oliver.

I’ve changed mine up a little bit so give me some feedback with new options.

As for yours, I’m currently running with both Bont & Mitchell at that price. Same midfield as yours but Macrae out to allow for the other two. If you definitely want Macrae than Mitchell allows you not to double up on the Bulldogs.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Colley Dogs on March 07, 2020, 12:43:24 AM
For M11:

Sharp v Budarick

Who scores better?
Who has better job security?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 07, 2020, 10:18:19 AM
For M11:

Sharp v Budarick

Who scores better?
Who has better job security?

If both are named round 1, pick both. If they're both named and you're forced to only pick one, I'd go Budarick.



JKelly/Danger/Bont/Titch + Dev

vs.

Coniglio + MacPherson
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Colley Dogs on March 07, 2020, 01:10:29 PM
For M11:

Sharp v Budarick

Who scores better?
Who has better job security?

If both are named round 1, pick both. If they're both named and you're forced to only pick one, I'd go Budarick.



JKelly/Danger/Bont/Titch + Dev

vs.

Coniglio + MacPherson

Thanks for the input.

_______________

Regarding yours...

So difficult to call in isolation. I've been never been on the Dev Smith bandwagon, and have only had him in different versions of my team under duress! Instinctually I opt for Coniglio + MacPherson.

But I'm more interested in how this sits within the larger structure of your team. I've given my thoughts on your team page  :)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Money Shot on March 08, 2020, 08:21:40 AM
Dawson v Petracca

I think Dawson is a safe bet for 90 or so but Petracca really has the capability to push 100. In saying that is also more likely to go 85 or less.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RaisyDaisy on March 08, 2020, 08:27:55 AM
For M11:

Sharp v Budarick

Who scores better?
Who has better job security?


At this stage I doubt you'll get the choice - take anyone we can get! Definitely starting both if they get named, and can't see a scenario where I would only pick one and not the other

JKelly/Danger/Bont/Titch + Dev

vs.

Coniglio + MacPherson

Option 1, easily

Top 5 mid + Dev over a speculative mid and fwd

Dawson v Petracca

I think Dawson is a safe bet for 90 or so but Petracca really has the capability to push 100. In saying that is also more likely to go 85 or less.

I'm just not convinced with Petracca, so I'd go with Dawson - DPP might be helpful too.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 09, 2020, 07:16:00 PM
After the illuminating weekend "not really"

D.Smith v J.Steven v A.Brayshaw

I was pretty sold on what i have seen (and heard) on Brayshaw as a starting F3/F4. Lots of mid time with new coach Longmuir and set to be a possible breakout

Now Dev and Stephen have kicked my possible structure round with some pretty impressive SC scoring today
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 10, 2020, 12:15:50 PM
Whitfiled, Titch & Ash/Guthrie vs Ceglar, Conigs, Houston
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on March 10, 2020, 12:35:03 PM
After the illuminating weekend "not really"

D.Smith v J.Steven v A.Brayshaw

I was pretty sold on what i have seen (and heard) on Brayshaw as a starting F3/F4. Lots of mid time with new coach Longmuir and set to be a possible breakout

Now Dev and Stephen have kicked my possible structure round with some pretty impressive SC scoring today

All of the above...
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on March 10, 2020, 12:48:28 PM
Whitfiled, Titch & Ash/Guthrie vs Ceglar, Conigs, Houston

Option 1

Option 2 is just way too risky.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 10, 2020, 01:19:53 PM
Grundy v Gawn? No cop out answers of “both” either please.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Money Shot on March 10, 2020, 01:27:52 PM
Grundy v Gawn? No cop out answers of “both” either please.
Both ;)

But out of the two definitely Grundy.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 10, 2020, 01:46:03 PM
Whitfiled, Titch & Ash/Guthrie vs Ceglar, Conigs, Houston

Option 1

Option 2 is just way too risky.
Thanks LS, just thinking of having an extra premo in def, but agree with you and am sticking with option 1.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on March 10, 2020, 02:31:44 PM
Grundy v Gawn?

Gotta be Grundy!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dmac07 on March 10, 2020, 03:46:06 PM
Houston v Dawson v Crisp
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 10, 2020, 03:51:41 PM
Houston v Dawson v Crisp
Would say Houston out of the 3 purely because he's tipped to spend more time in the middle this year. In saying that, I haven't got any of them.

Roberton vs Cumming
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on March 10, 2020, 04:09:00 PM
Houston v Dawson v Crisp
Would say Houston out of the 3 purely because he's tipped to spend more time in the middle this year. In saying that, I haven't got any of them.

Roberton vs Cumming

Roberton 200%
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dmac07 on March 10, 2020, 05:06:09 PM
F3/D4

Parish/Dawson & Noble
V
Steven & Roberton
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Woppa15 on March 10, 2020, 10:32:26 PM
@D4 Roberton vs Noble...?
Needing to “cut some fat” in order to fit everyone in and this is one of my options.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 10, 2020, 10:39:19 PM
@D4 Roberton vs Noble...?
Needing to “cut some fat” in order to fit everyone in and this is one of my options.

Roberton's JS is much better than Nobles, but I think it depends on what that extra 45k unlocks for you.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 11, 2020, 09:32:29 AM
F3/D4

Parish/Dawson & Noble
V
Steven & Roberton
Toss a coin. Both have risks.  If Steven and Roberton can reach their previous levels then they are the obvious choice as both will be keepers. So is that risk worth taking if not go first one.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Woppa15 on March 11, 2020, 09:42:31 AM
@D4 Roberton vs Noble...?
Needing to “cut some fat” in order to fit everyone in and this is one of my options.

Roberton's JS is much better than Nobles, but I think it depends on what that extra 45k unlocks for you.

Thanks Integral. I thought about this a bit overnight and I think I’ll stick with Roberton. He was my original pick so gotta to with the gut. Also, I think I’m more comfortable picking the bloke who is an established player and has the scoring history with injury/health interruption the reason for his low price, I feel it’s far less risky and speculative then trying to pick the breakout player who doesn’t have the scoring history.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 11, 2020, 10:28:05 AM
Gawn+Greenwood+Roberton

Or

Jacobs+Walters+Hurn
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 11, 2020, 11:24:59 AM
Gawn+Greenwood+Roberton

Or

Jacobs+Walters+Hurn
1st option for me. Walters and Hurn overpriced for me and you should get them cheaper. Robbo is cheap and hard to pass up.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Pokerface on March 11, 2020, 08:06:24 PM
Sicily v McCluggage?

Prices the same, who scores more until the byes. Ignore structure, Houston goes in the other position.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Money Shot on March 11, 2020, 08:14:09 PM
Sicily v McCluggage?

Prices the same, who scores more until the byes. Ignore structure, Houston goes in the other position.
McClugage might our score him but Sicily much more likely to be top 10.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 11, 2020, 09:38:59 PM
Sicily v McCluggage?

Prices the same, who scores more until the byes. Ignore structure, Houston goes in the other position.
McClugage might our score him but Sicily much more likely to be top 10.
+1, Sicily will more likely be a keeper in his position but McCluggage will score more you would think
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Pokerface on March 11, 2020, 09:41:55 PM
Cheers Money, Wanderer. I tend to agree, though do I think McC is one of the sub 600s who could push for a top 10 this year. Hmm.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 11, 2020, 09:50:13 PM
Cheers Money, Wanderer. I tend to agree, though do I think McC is one of the sub 600s who could push for a top 10 this year. Hmm.
McC is more durable than some of the top 10 mids but the top 10 mids last year all averaged over 110. McC averaged 94 last year. The question is do you see him jumping 16 points in average this year? I'm guessing he could add another 10 points to his average which won't get him into top 10.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on March 11, 2020, 10:15:29 PM
Howe v Parish v Andy Brayshaw  for my last spot .(pending teams)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 12, 2020, 09:05:34 AM
Howe v Parish v Andy Brayshaw  for my last spot .(pending teams)
Parish for me
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 12, 2020, 09:18:14 AM
One I am considering

Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.

Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.

Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on March 12, 2020, 09:40:15 AM
Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.

Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.

I'm in a similar situation, though looking at Naismith instead of Jacobs. Whitfield v Gawn is an interesting one and right now I have Whitfield.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 12, 2020, 03:51:42 PM
Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.

Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.

I'm in a similar situation, though looking at Naismith instead of Jacobs. Whitfield v Gawn is an interesting one and right now I have Whitfield.
if its just whitfield v gawn, gawn wins easily, depends where you spend the cash when you have gawn. Gawn is a better sc captain and scored 917 more sc points than whitfield last year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on March 12, 2020, 04:20:46 PM
Gawn/Steven v Jacobs/ Whitfield.

Either option 1 definite keeper and possibly 2 with Steven. Jacobs also could be if he gets back to 2014 form.

I'm in a similar situation, though looking at Naismith instead of Jacobs. Whitfield v Gawn is an interesting one and right now I have Whitfield.
if its just whitfield v gawn, gawn wins easily, depends where you spend the cash when you have gawn. Gawn is a better sc captain and scored 917 more sc points than whitfield last year.

That's right, I should have developed that a bit more. The money is used for better back and forward rookies. More importantly for me, there is a significant opportunity cost involved in fielding the third and fourth best forward rookies this year, rather than Whitfield and the third best rookie - in other words, Naismith on field looks a lot better than e.g. King or Georgiades, who I would have to play if I had Gawn in
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Hawker_08 on March 12, 2020, 05:48:00 PM
G'day Lads. Quick one:

DMac & Zerk-Thatcher vs Ceglar & Noble
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: sidvicious on March 12, 2020, 07:50:54 PM
G'day Lads. Quick one:

DMac & Zerk-Thatcher vs Ceglar & Noble
ceglar & noble if you need ruck cover
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on March 12, 2020, 07:59:12 PM
Neale & Oliver or Bonts & Titchell
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: sidvicious on March 12, 2020, 08:07:03 PM
Neale & Oliver or Bonts & Titchell
Bont & Tich had Oliver all last year never again . Although never say never in supercoach
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: timtim on March 13, 2020, 02:16:14 AM
Gawn vs Macrae?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: TexR74 on March 13, 2020, 10:11:41 PM
Gawn vs Macrae?
Macrae
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Rodi on March 15, 2020, 10:35:07 AM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 15, 2020, 12:51:34 PM
Dev Smith for me most upside if he stays healthy.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 15, 2020, 02:08:53 PM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
ABrayshaw
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 15, 2020, 02:10:22 PM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
ABrayshaw
Fitter, a few kgs of muscle on the frame, midtime minutes under a new coach
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: sidvicious on March 15, 2020, 04:43:47 PM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
Jack Steven
Lower starting price and higher scoring potential
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on March 15, 2020, 08:47:16 PM
Dev Smith vs Andy Brayshaw vs Jack Steven
Jack Steven
Lower starting price and higher scoring potential
Of the 3 I think Steven, followed closely by Smith. Brayshaw a long was behind both of them.

Steven 7 of last 8 years over 80 average. including 3 over 100 and 5 over 90. Last year only played 7 games, but still hit 90+ in 3 of them. Risk for me onhim wasn't scoring, it was the job security and rest factor.

Brayshaw doesn't have the runs on the board, only gone over 80 in 7 of 39 games.

Smith I can make a case for, but its been done to death on here, so I wont repeat it all.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: timtim on March 15, 2020, 09:27:01 PM
I’d go with brayshaw and dev
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: timtim on March 15, 2020, 09:28:20 PM
Steven or Ceglar?

I have Naismith at R2
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Hawker_08 on March 15, 2020, 10:17:05 PM
Gawn & Mid Bench Rookie (Mahoney/Robertson) vs Naismith & Titch
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 16, 2020, 09:03:31 AM
Steven or Ceglar?

I have Naismith at R2
With Naismith at 2 I would go the added protection of Ceglar ensuring you have a R/f at R3
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on March 16, 2020, 09:07:40 AM
Gawn & Mid Bench Rookie (Mahoney/Robertson) vs Naismith & Titch
Hard one here Nismith say 75 average and Titch say 120 total 195 v Gawn say 130 so in front there but will be soundly dependent on how quick you can upgrade as both options have only one keeper.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 17, 2020, 12:46:44 PM
Roberton (D3)+ Noble (D4) + 133k (to be used elsewhere) v Houston (D3) + Greaves + $300. Have Zerk-Thatcher and Starcevich currently on the field aswell.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: TurtlesTerriers on March 17, 2020, 05:06:45 PM

Player                   Club   Pos            Price   Games   Mins   TOG%   Pts   PPM 100   Ave          1   2

Darcy MacPherson   GCS   Fwd/Mid   $443,800   2           213   86.2%   259   121.6   129.5   132   127
 or
Andrew Brayshaw   FRE   Fwd/Mid   $382,800   2           164   70.5%   196   119.5   98           94   102
or
Tom J. Lynch           RIC   Fwd           $388,800   1           110   90.5%   111   100.9   111              111

i like lynch given all the G games at home, but we all know about key fwds.
GCS as per another thread here, ??
so leaves me with brayshaw
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: whynot102 on March 17, 2020, 06:57:26 PM
Cogs or Yeo
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Pokerface on March 17, 2020, 09:13:47 PM

Player                   Club   Pos            Price   Games   Mins   TOG%   Pts   PPM 100   Ave          1   2

Darcy MacPherson   GCS   Fwd/Mid   $443,800   2           213   86.2%   259   121.6   129.5   132   127
 or
Andrew Brayshaw   FRE   Fwd/Mid   $382,800   2           164   70.5%   196   119.5   98           94   102
or
Tom J. Lynch           RIC   Fwd           $388,800   1           110   90.5%   111   100.9   111              111

i like lynch given all the G games at home, but we all know about key fwds.
GCS as per another thread here, ??
so leaves me with brayshaw

We don't know how many G games he has now.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 17, 2020, 11:35:38 PM
Cogs or Yeo
Good question... my M5 swings between these two. ..
I am going to review the proposed game schedule and who each plays and where. I have Cogs mainly because he has the captaincy now ... No other reason except that I expect him to respond positively to that
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Carn on March 18, 2020, 09:28:50 PM
A: McPherson & Houston
Or
B: Laird & Ceglar
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 18, 2020, 10:00:14 PM
A: McPherson & Houston
Or
B: Laird & Ceglar
Option B, plus let’s u have ruck cover
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 18, 2020, 11:33:30 PM
Roberton (D3)+ Noble (D4) + 133k (to be used elsewhere) v Houston (D3) + Greaves + $300. Have Zerk-Thatcher and Starcevich currently on the field aswell.
First option


Player                   Club   Pos            Price   Games   Mins   TOG%   Pts   PPM 100   Ave          1   2

Darcy MacPherson   GCS   Fwd/Mid   $443,800   2           213   86.2%   259   121.6   129.5   132   127
 or
Andrew Brayshaw   FRE   Fwd/Mid   $382,800   2           164   70.5%   196   119.5   98           94   102
or
Tom J. Lynch           RIC   Fwd           $388,800   1           110   90.5%   111   100.9   111              111

i like lynch given all the G games at home, but we all know about key fwds.
GCS as per another thread here, ??
so leaves me with brayshaw
DMac :-*

Cogs or Yeo
Cogs

A: McPherson & Houston
Or
B: Laird & Ceglar
A because DMac :-*
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 19, 2020, 09:41:08 AM
Cogs + Greenwood + And. Brayshaw vs. Titch + Whitfield + Rookie
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 19, 2020, 02:44:18 PM
Cogs + Greenwood + And. Brayshaw vs. Titch + Whitfield + Rookie

Prob option b for me. Get 2 essentially guaranteed keepers vs 1 keeper and 2 maybes.

1. Laird, Cogs, Naismith, Petracca
Vs
2. Sicily, Viney, Gawn, Cavarra
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 19, 2020, 04:31:03 PM
Another 2:

Laird and Josh Kelly
Vs
Sicily and Neale

Neale v Fyfe
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 19, 2020, 05:22:58 PM
Another 2:

Laird and Josh Kelly
Vs
Sicily and Neale

Neale v Fyfe
I have gone with Laird and Fyfe.


Walters + defensive rookie (D5) + 39k v Andrew Brayshaw, Noble + 112k left in bank.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: North Melbournes Finest on March 19, 2020, 07:21:36 PM
I've been wrestling with whether to get SPS in all pre-season. I wish he played one Marsh game so I could at least get one glimpse of his role this year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 19, 2020, 10:36:35 PM
Gawn + Roberton + Andrew Brayshaw v Nic Nat + Houston + Parish + 37.8k
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 19, 2020, 11:03:23 PM
Gawn + Roberton + Andrew Brayshaw v Nic Nat + Houston + Parish + 37.8k
Option 2 ...  no ...  Option 1
Can I have NN + Houston + Brayshaw ???
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on March 20, 2020, 12:29:55 PM
Stevens out so have taken a playing rook which now leaves me with $240K in the kitty
Question Do I "upgrade" Cogs?
Who from Macrae/JKelly/Bont/Danger or keep the money?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on March 20, 2020, 12:49:42 PM
Really struggling to pick two out of Bont, Macrae and Dunkley. help!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on March 20, 2020, 12:57:55 PM
Really struggling to pick two out of Bont, Macrae and Dunkley. help!
Bont and Macrae
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Keeper27 on March 20, 2020, 01:48:48 PM
Gawn (R2) + Rookie (M11) + $4k

or

Jacobs (R2) + Narkle (M6) + $73K
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 01:56:12 PM
Stevens out so have taken a playing rook which now leaves me with $240K in the kitty
Question Do I "upgrade" Cogs?
Who from Macrae/JKelly/Bont/Danger or keep the money?
Macrae
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 01:56:54 PM
Gawn (R2) + Rookie (M11) + $4k

or

Jacobs (R2) + Narkle (M6) + $73K
Option 1
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SydneyRox on March 20, 2020, 02:11:40 PM
Tyler Brown v Justin McInerny

Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SydneyRox on March 20, 2020, 02:13:31 PM
Really struggling to pick two out of Bont, Macrae and Dunkley. help!
Bont and Macrae

Bont and Kelly (Macrae if you want to though...)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: mjmmjm34 on March 20, 2020, 03:36:50 PM
Last mid:

McInerney v Noah Anderson v Ash?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on March 20, 2020, 03:51:33 PM
Assuming we don't get both Robertson and Starcevich today...

B. Smith + Cogs vs Howe + Mitchell?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on March 20, 2020, 04:09:32 PM
B. Smith + Cogs vs Howe + Mitchell?

I'm saying Smith + Cogs. It's slightly speculative, but Smith is set for good mid time and Cogs looks set to take another step this year. Mitchell a great pick imo but I have doubts on Howe
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Dmoney$ on March 20, 2020, 05:33:51 PM
Please pick 3 lads

Georgiadis
King
Curtis Taylor
Ben Davis
Sturt
Bedford
Ballenden
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: AN1611 on March 20, 2020, 05:43:10 PM
Bont vs Dunkley vs Danger?

Pls pick one
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2020, 05:47:36 PM
Bont vs Dunkley vs Danger?

Pls pick one
all solid picks.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on March 20, 2020, 05:49:25 PM
Bont vs Dunkley vs Danger?

Pls pick one
all solid picks.

I went Bont out of these three
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 20, 2020, 05:55:12 PM
Gawn and Schultz (F5)

Vs

English and Petracca/McPherson (F4)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on March 20, 2020, 06:00:40 PM
Davis vs Cavarra for F7?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 20, 2020, 06:14:13 PM
McInerney vs T Brown (Bench)

J Dawson vs Petracca (F4)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jfitty on March 20, 2020, 06:22:07 PM
Davis vs Cavarra for F7?

Cavarra

McInerney vs T Brown (Bench)

J Dawson vs Petracca (F4)

Brown and Petracca

How about Xerri, Comben or Conroy for R3??
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: ants on March 20, 2020, 06:33:51 PM
gawn+rookie vs ceglar+nic nat?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2020, 06:44:09 PM
Davis vs Cavarra for F7?

Cavarra

McInerney vs T Brown (Bench)

J Dawson vs Petracca (F4)

Brown and Petracca

How about Xerri, Comben or Conroy for R3??
Xerri

gawn+rookie vs ceglar+nic nat?
gawn + rookie
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2020, 06:45:38 PM
Mcasey v Zac Gutherie
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 06:51:30 PM
Mcasey v Zac Gutherie
Guthrie
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2020, 06:58:56 PM
Mcasey v Zac Gutherie
Guthrie
do you have a particular reason why you'd pick him? cause in the past when i have seen him he has been shower.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: dylanclements on March 20, 2020, 07:14:11 PM
Green and K Pickett
v.
Robertson and Schultz

First option better in some ways, but Green would be on the bench. Option two with Schultz on field seems more comfortable than K Pickett, and Robertson on field gives me M Pickett's score.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 07:20:49 PM
Mcasey v Zac Gutherie
Guthrie
do you have a particular reason why you'd pick him? cause in the past when i have seen him he has been shower.
Has a couple of years under his belt so should improve.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Grazz on March 20, 2020, 07:24:42 PM
Thatcher or Brander.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 07:24:50 PM
Titch vs Bont v Kelly
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 20, 2020, 07:25:05 PM
Bont vs Cogs & extra $80k for future trades
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 07:28:53 PM
Thatcher or Brander.
ZBT

Bont vs Cogs & extra $80k for future trades
Bont
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on March 20, 2020, 07:38:44 PM
Thatcher or Brander.
ZBT

Bont vs Cogs & extra $80k for future trades
Bont

How about Cogs and Fischer McAsey vs Bont and Williams
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 20, 2020, 07:42:07 PM
Thatcher or Brander.
ZBT

Bont vs Cogs & extra $80k for future trades
Bont

How about Cogs and Fischer McAsey vs Bont and Williams
Bont and Williams
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: B. on March 21, 2020, 08:23:07 AM
Had a play around and tried to get more depth in my side and wanted to see what everyone thinks.

1. Gawn- T. Green (mid) - McAsey (def)
v
2. Naismith- Coniglio- Houston
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: js19 on March 21, 2020, 08:54:37 AM
Had a play around and tried to get more depth in my side and wanted to see what everyone thinks.

1. Gawn- T. Green (mid) - McAsey (def)
v
2. Naismith- Coniglio- Houston

Option 2 is around $250k more, so depends where that money is taken from...
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Judd Magic on March 21, 2020, 09:11:59 AM
Sicily or Houston?  ???
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 09:14:00 AM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 09:38:29 AM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: leighroids on March 21, 2020, 09:42:48 AM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: B. on March 21, 2020, 10:28:31 AM
Had a play around and tried to get more depth in my side and wanted to see what everyone thinks.

1. Gawn- T. Green (mid) - McAsey (def)
v
2. Naismith- Coniglio- Houston

Option 2 is around $250k more, so depends where that money is taken from...


Sorry was short on Cogs/Houston but flicking Gawn gave me both!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 12:01:05 PM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?

It all depends on Hurleys ability to score in a key position back role and he seems more susceptible to low scoring games than Houston who is playing more on the ball. Titch is better than Oliver and Danger IMO.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: js19 on March 21, 2020, 12:19:45 PM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?

It all depends on Hurleys ability to score in a key position back role and he seems more susceptible to low scoring games than Houston who is playing more on the ball. Titch is better than Oliver and Danger IMO.

Hurley is tempting though. Similar position to Howe - underpriced after a down year
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 12:29:40 PM
Gday all. Deciding on this combo
Houston and Oliver 
Or
Hurley and Danger
Thoughts?
Houston and Oliver without a doubt IMO
Cheers. How about if I change Danger to Titch?

It all depends on Hurleys ability to score in a key position back role and he seems more susceptible to low scoring games than Houston who is playing more on the ball. Titch is better than Oliver and Danger IMO.

Hurley is tempting though. Similar position to Howe - underpriced after a down year

Hurley scored 43 and 116 in his two Marsh series. He can go big, but he can pull out the low scores. I haven't been watching the Bombers so I'm no expert, but isn't he the full back? I don't think Howe is locking down the key forwards. That would be Moore and Roughead, which leaves Howe more open to intercept, link up and drive the ball outside the back 50.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on March 21, 2020, 12:54:29 PM
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on March 21, 2020, 12:57:42 PM
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Davis
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 01:00:23 PM
Z.Guthrie vs Roberton?

Guthrie gives me the cash to get a higher priced rookie that is playing vs having a non-playing rookie like Williams.
I don't know anything about Guthrie JS but his Marsh scores weren't bad.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 01:02:05 PM
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Davis
It's a toss up between Davis and Georgiadis. Davis slightly cheaper but I went with Georgiadis because they are playing GC.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Slick5 on March 21, 2020, 01:03:18 PM
Sicily or Houston?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on March 21, 2020, 01:03:52 PM
who out of Georgiades, Davis and King? this will be for F7
Davis
It's a toss up between Davis and Georgiadis. Davis slightly cheaper but I went with Georgiadis because they are playing GC.

Yeah i've decided to go with Georgiades as well..
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 01:18:27 PM
Sicily or Houston?
I went with Sicily because Hawks have more key position defenders this year, so you would think Sicily plays that sweeper role, the way Howe did last night, and it looks like a higher scoring role under the new format. If Houston didn't have a good finish last year I wouldn't even be considering him.
FWIW, Sicily first three games vs GCS/ADEL/NTH, Houston BRIS/FREO/COLL. I can see lots of intercept marks and link up plays out of the backline for Sicily to start the year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on March 21, 2020, 01:20:59 PM
Z.Guthrie vs Roberton?

Guthrie gives me the cash to get a higher priced rookie that is playing vs having a non-playing rookie like Williams.
I don't know anything about Guthrie JS but his Marsh scores weren't bad.
I have both and very unconvinced that either be worth it in the long-term. I'd probably get roberton as is way more likely to be a more reliable sc player. If possible i'd try and get cash from somewhere else.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on March 21, 2020, 01:29:52 PM
Z.Guthrie vs Roberton?

Guthrie gives me the cash to get a higher priced rookie that is playing vs having a non-playing rookie like Williams.
I don't know anything about Guthrie JS but his Marsh scores weren't bad.
I have both and very unconvinced that either be worth it in the long-term. I'd probably get roberton as is way more likely to be a more reliable sc player. If possible i'd try and get cash from somewhere else.
The way I see it is Guthrie saves me 75K. If Guthrie can stay within 15 points average of Roberton, then it would be worth it. Lets say Roberton scores 80 average, you would think Guthrie could manage a 65. The only problem is I have no idea what Guthrie's JS is like.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on March 21, 2020, 01:37:14 PM
Sicily v Laird
Houston v Brodie Smith

Got a sneaky feeling Smith is going close to 100 this year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: North Melbournes Finest on March 21, 2020, 04:26:13 PM
Sicily v Laird
Houston v Brodie Smith

Got a sneaky feeling Smith is going close to 100 this year.
I would love Laird over Sicily, but I'm about $400 short and can't work out how to manage that. Laird and Houston.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: North Melbournes Finest on March 21, 2020, 04:41:49 PM
Sicily or Houston?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on June 10, 2020, 09:18:02 PM
Doedee + Roberton (1 trade needed) vs Rivers + Howe (2 trades needed)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: whynot102 on June 11, 2020, 08:19:45 AM
Option 2 I traded out Roberton for Howe this week
Doedee + Roberton (1 trade needed) vs Rivers + Howe (2 trades needed)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on June 11, 2020, 04:47:19 PM
Sicily or Houston?

both were ave rnd 1, but probably Sic just.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on June 11, 2020, 06:49:07 PM
Townsend + Rivers (can loop with Starcevich) vs. Doedee + Cameron (can loop with Brander)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on June 11, 2020, 06:50:21 PM
Townsend + Rivers (can loop with Starcevich) vs. Doedee + Cameron (can loop with Brander)

Option 2 for me
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on June 11, 2020, 09:54:14 PM
A) Bewley & Ridley
B) Heeney & Rivers
C) Shiel v Rivers
Worried about Rivers being dropped after just the one game
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on June 11, 2020, 10:16:23 PM
A) Bewley & Ridley
B) Heeney & Rivers
C) Shiel v Rivers
Worried about Rivers being dropped after just the one game
from this list i'd go B. Although rivers is a pretty risky pick.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on June 11, 2020, 10:20:53 PM
DBJ + King on field v Doedee (D4) + long/townsend
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: js19 on June 12, 2020, 08:35:44 AM
DBJ + King on field v Doedee (D4) + long/townsend
Doedee and Long just for me
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: js19 on June 12, 2020, 08:36:43 AM
Bont (keeping), Bewley and Townsend

Vs

Greenwood, Jacobs and Long
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: HoleMeal on June 12, 2020, 09:25:42 AM
Bont (keeping), Bewley and Townsend

Vs

Greenwood, Jacobs and Long
The 2nd one.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on June 12, 2020, 10:57:59 AM
Bont (keeping), Bewley and Townsend

Vs

Greenwood, Jacobs and Long
I don't like either of those options but if forced to pick one it would be option 2
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on June 12, 2020, 11:56:42 AM
DBJ + King on field v Doedee (D4) + long/townsend
Doedee and Long just for me
thanks m8. i am very indecisive with this decision. The rookie would probably end up being budarick instead of king. i feel doedee and long has the potential to make more money although option one is likely to be more safer.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on June 12, 2020, 01:31:36 PM
Bewley or Long?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on June 12, 2020, 02:03:15 PM
DBJ + King on field v Doedee (D4) + long/townsend
Doedee and Long just for me
thanks m8. i am very indecisive with this decision. The rookie would probably end up being budarick instead of king. i feel doedee and long has the potential to make more money although option one is likely to be more safer.
i could also do Rivers (emergency loophole with starcevich) + Simpkin and 117k left over. Which i can then do BZT to Doedee next week if doedee does well this week.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on June 12, 2020, 03:06:46 PM
DBJ + King on field v Doedee (D4) + long/townsend
Doedee and Long just for me
thanks m8. i am very indecisive with this decision. The rookie would probably end up being budarick instead of king. i feel doedee and long has the potential to make more money although option one is likely to be more safer.
i could also do Rivers (emergency loophole with starcevich) + Simpkin and 117k left over. Which i can then do BZT to Doedee next week if doedee does well this week.
That sounds like a good move, but keep in mind there are only two trades next week. Think about who you might want to get next week and if you already have two in mind, then better to get Doedee this week. If you don't have two in mind to get next week, then better to wait a week for Doedee.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on June 12, 2020, 03:51:06 PM
Brayshaw to Wingard or Greenwood?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on June 12, 2020, 03:54:58 PM
Brayshaw to Wingard or Greenwood?
Greenwood
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Peter on June 12, 2020, 04:02:36 PM
Gone to Wingard - big numbers last half dozen games and certainly starting in the guts
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on June 12, 2020, 06:20:57 PM
Tom Stewart v nick Haynes
Tom Mitchell v coniglio

Reason?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jfitty on June 12, 2020, 06:21:44 PM
For my last trade:

Rivers vs McHenry

I'll grab the other one next week.

If I get Rivers I'll play him (over Starcevich), but if I grab McHenry I'll need to play Starcevich..
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on June 12, 2020, 06:42:30 PM
For my last trade:

Rivers vs McHenry

I'll grab the other one next week.

If I get Rivers I'll play him (over Starcevich), but if I grab McHenry I'll need to play Starcevich..

Have you got Bennell or taking a pass on him?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jfitty on June 12, 2020, 06:59:45 PM
For my last trade:

Rivers vs McHenry

I'll grab the other one next week.

If I get Rivers I'll play him (over Starcevich), but if I grab McHenry I'll need to play Starcevich..

Have you got Bennell or taking a pass on him?

Already brought him in for Green :)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on June 13, 2020, 10:30:17 AM
Would you bring in Bennel or Rivers early> need to go early on one to leave room next week for the best of the alternative, McHenry and Sturt (if he is back)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on June 13, 2020, 10:32:19 AM
Would you bring in Bennel or Rivers early> need to go early on one to leave room next week for the best of the alternative, McHenry and Sturt (if he is back)
Rivers because he is DPP and gives you more flexibility
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on June 13, 2020, 12:23:14 PM
Would you bring in Bennel or Rivers early> need to go early on one to leave room next week for the best of the alternative, McHenry and Sturt (if he is back)
Rivers because he is DPP and gives you more flexibility
This, plus surely you'd wanna see Bennell get through a game before bringing him in.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Colley Dogs on June 15, 2020, 10:44:58 AM
Hello everyone. Nice to be back  :)

Trading out Houston:

DBJ v Howe v Haynes
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Thewizz71 on June 15, 2020, 11:36:16 AM
Hello everyone. Nice to be back  :)

Trading out Houston:

DBJ v Howe v Haynes

Howe > Haynes > DBJ
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: oh_lol on June 15, 2020, 04:58:51 PM
Gawn v Goldy?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Thewizz71 on June 15, 2020, 06:18:56 PM
Gawn v Goldy?
If Goldy can keep it up, a huge POD.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RaisyDaisy on June 15, 2020, 07:00:04 PM
Gawn v Goldy?
If Goldy can keep it up, a huge POD.

A POD just for the sake of being one. Not sure it's actually a good POD when Grundy Gawn is the opposition/alternative

Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Thewizz71 on June 15, 2020, 07:22:38 PM
Gawn v Goldy?
If Goldy can keep it up, a huge POD.

A POD just for the sake of being one. Not sure it's actually a good POD when Grundy Gawn is the opposition/alternative

Not sure he can keep it up, but after 2/17 rounds, second top scorer, ahead of the other two, proven scorer.... could be the difference.

Not sure I want to risk it, but, just saying.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Fid on June 16, 2020, 05:00:55 PM
Starcevich V Rivers
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: shaker on June 16, 2020, 05:09:18 PM
Starcevich V Rivers
Rivers is much cheaper so him but Starcevich might have better JS listening to the coach talk about him , that probably hasn't helped you at all  :D
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Fid on June 16, 2020, 05:59:26 PM
Starcevich V Rivers
Rivers is much cheaper so him but Starcevich might have better JS listening to the coach talk about him , that probably hasn't helped you at all  :D

lol, thanks ???
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on June 16, 2020, 07:59:47 PM
Rank the following: Stewart, Rampe, DBJ, Haynes. Take price into consideration.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Judd Magic on June 16, 2020, 08:43:17 PM
Rank the following: Stewart, Rampe, DBJ, Haynes. Take price into consideration.

I really like DBJ for some reason.

Reckon this is his breakout season.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Mat0369 on June 17, 2020, 01:33:59 AM
Rank the following: Stewart, Rampe, DBJ, Haynes. Take price into consideration.

Stewart and wouldn't bother with the rest.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: bkimm32 on June 17, 2020, 07:56:13 AM
Rivers vs Bennell
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on June 17, 2020, 08:16:38 AM
Bennell based on last weeks game but need to be prepared for a possible injury based on history.  Hopefully he makes cash quickly to counter,  For what it is worth I have both.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: bkimm32 on June 17, 2020, 08:55:36 AM
I’d love to have both, but think I’ll grab Sturt this week (providing he’s playing) and one of them
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: _wato on June 17, 2020, 10:38:13 AM
Goldy + Sturt + 20k
V
Pittonet + Baz Smith + 90k 
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on June 17, 2020, 12:26:23 PM
Rank the following: Stewart, Rampe, DBJ, Haynes. Take price into consideration.
Stewart, Haynes, DBJ, Rampe

Rivers vs Bennell
Both but if you had to choose one Rivers - DPP and plus Bennell more injury prone.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Mat0369 on June 17, 2020, 01:39:28 PM
Bennell spent so much of the game running the boundary. His TOG was super low but when he was on the field he looked legit. Rivers was also excellent. I'd honestly try to grab both but I don't know if you can trust Bennell on field with such low TOG %
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Thewizz71 on June 18, 2020, 11:24:37 AM
Who to punt?

Bont v NicNat?

Bont -> anyone (probably Fyfe or Zerrett)
NicNat -> Goldy or Gawn (actually leaning towards Goldy  :o)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on June 18, 2020, 06:23:43 PM
Rivers v Bennell v Sturt v Georgiades
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Thewizz71 on June 18, 2020, 06:26:46 PM
Rivers v Bennell v Sturt v Georgiades

Leaning towards Bennell. Think sturt and Georgia's will rely on goals too much.
Like Rivers as well.
Got bennell last week. Rivers this week.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on June 18, 2020, 06:36:47 PM
Rivers v Bennell v Sturt v Georgiades

Leaning towards Bennell. Think sturt and Georgia's will rely on goals too much.
Like Rivers as well.
Got bennell last week. Rivers this week.
Thanks m8. I almost have rivers locked in although if I go with a second rookie its now bennell v Sturt.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 06:42:56 PM
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: benharris222 on June 18, 2020, 06:46:03 PM
Sturt v Georgiades.

Missed out on both their games round one
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 06:48:52 PM
Sturt v Georgiades.

Missed out on both their games round one

Sturt considering he’s named on field and georg in extended
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on June 18, 2020, 07:01:28 PM
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
If price isn't an issue id easily go walters
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: benharris222 on June 18, 2020, 07:02:49 PM
Sturt v Georgiades.

Missed out on both their games round one

Sturt considering he’s named on field and georg in extended

Thank you! What about scoring potential? Both need to rely on goals...?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 07:09:10 PM
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
If price isn't an issue id easily go walters

What if we take Walters out of the equation ?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Mat0369 on June 18, 2020, 07:11:36 PM
Thinking of trading Dusty, here are the options

Selwood, Rozee, Bailey Smith, Tom Stewart or Ablett

Other option is hold

I'm leaning towards Selwood.....
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on June 18, 2020, 07:16:21 PM
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
If price isn't an issue id easily go walters

What if we take Walters out of the equation ?

I have the same dilemma.

I'm leaning towards Petracca. Heeney will certainly come down in price after last week and is quite inconsistent; Rozee has posted 2 great scores against 2 awful teams; Smith is great but those ins put a question mark over his role.

I'm leaning towards getting CP.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on June 18, 2020, 07:18:15 PM
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
If price isn't an issue id easily go walters

What if we take Walters out of the equation ?

I have the same dilemma.

I'm leaning towards Petracca. Heeney will certainly come down in price after last week and is quite inconsistent; Rozee has posted 2 great scores against 2 awful teams; Smith is great but those ins put a question mark over his role.

I'm leaning towards getting CP.

He burnt me badly a few years which 3rd degree burns, still hurts
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on June 18, 2020, 07:22:17 PM
Walters, Heeney, Bailey Smith, Petracca, rozee, put them in order considering price
If price isn't an issue id easily go walters

What if we take Walters out of the equation ?

I have the same dilemma.

I'm leaning towards Petracca. Heeney will certainly come down in price after last week and is quite inconsistent; Rozee has posted 2 great scores against 2 awful teams; Smith is great but those ins put a question mark over his role.

I'm leaning towards getting CP.

He burnt me badly a few years which 3rd degree burns, still hurts

I know. He was on my never again list but he finally looks primed for that breakout season, especially paired with what looks like a very sharp decline from Nate Jones.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: no eye deer on June 19, 2020, 04:20:12 PM
Probably been done, but Sturt vs Bennell
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on June 19, 2020, 05:48:50 PM
Probably been done, but Sturt vs Bennell

Bennell
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: oh_lol on June 19, 2020, 06:33:11 PM
Robertson (Brisbane) v Bedford (Melbourne).

Which of these rookies is most likely going to get a game again? Want to trade one of them for Sturt.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on June 19, 2020, 07:19:53 PM
Robertson (Brisbane) v Bedford (Melbourne).

Which of these rookies is most likely going to get a game again? Want to trade one of them for Sturt.
dont know enough about either but id trade bedford
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Mat0369 on June 19, 2020, 07:35:48 PM
Bye bye Bedford
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: zac-ster on June 19, 2020, 08:29:55 PM
sturt vs cameron
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Thewizz71 on June 23, 2020, 09:54:20 AM
Simpkin v Petracca?

Can Simpkin keep it up? Wha't his role been this year?
Trac? Will he burn us again? "It's a trap!?"

Leaning towards Simpkin, hopefully he can continue to break out this year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on June 23, 2020, 04:36:12 PM
Simpkin v Petracca?

Can Simpkin keep it up? Wha't his role been this year?
Trac? Will he burn us again? "It's a trap!?"

Leaning towards Simpkin, hopefully he can continue to break out this year.

another to consider is Bailey Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Rusty00 on June 24, 2020, 01:46:01 PM
Simpkin v Petracca?

Can Simpkin keep it up? Wha't his role been this year?
Trac? Will he burn us again? "It's a trap!?"

Leaning towards Simpkin, hopefully he can continue to break out this year.

another to consider is Bailey Smith
Also Hugh Greenwood. Struggling to split these guys
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Thewizz71 on June 24, 2020, 01:50:01 PM
Simpkin v Petracca?

Can Simpkin keep it up? Wha't his role been this year?
Trac? Will he burn us again? "It's a trap!?"

Leaning towards Simpkin, hopefully he can continue to break out this year.

another to consider is Bailey Smith
Also Hugh Greenwood. Struggling to split these guys
And Brad Ebert. Might add a poll.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Dmoney$ on June 25, 2020, 01:08:46 AM
Louis Butler or Will Hamil?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ingram on June 25, 2020, 07:15:54 AM
Power move

Jelly to Neale Pickett to Bennell

or Strategic move

T. Green to Bennell Sturt to Hamill via Brander
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ringo on June 25, 2020, 08:19:51 AM
Would go first option as Neale will probably rise another 30k this week.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on June 26, 2020, 04:57:43 PM
Long to Ridley (already own doedee) + Whitfield to Simpkin or Walters (have to play both taylor/king)

vs

Long to Simpkin + BZT to S.Philp (or another rookie) (allows me to do emergency loophole with taylor and King)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: LordSneeze on June 26, 2020, 05:55:57 PM
Long to Ridley (already own doedee) + Whitfield to Simpkin or Walters (have to play both taylor/king)

vs

Long to Simpkin + BZT to S.Philp (or another rookie) (allows me to do emergency loophole with taylor and King)

I prefer option 2. But if you do you lock in that your keeping Whitfield.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on June 26, 2020, 06:19:43 PM
Long to Ridley (already own doedee) + Whitfield to Simpkin or Walters (have to play both taylor/king)

vs

Long to Simpkin + BZT to S.Philp (or another rookie) (allows me to do emergency loophole with taylor and King)

I prefer option 2. But if you do you lock in that your keeping Whitfield.
Thanks m8. Do you know much about Sam Philp or Jack Mahony? I want to take a punt on one of them to give me the best team setup for this week.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: B. on July 02, 2020, 12:49:41 PM
Simpkin v Bailey Smith?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on July 02, 2020, 05:13:37 PM
Simpkin v Bailey Smith?
Simpkin
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on July 02, 2020, 05:35:23 PM
Simpkin,  more mature - Smith may drop off a bit later.     Gee the dogs have a good midfield with Bont, Dunks, Macrae, Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on July 02, 2020, 05:52:13 PM
Williamson or Hill?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: miamis_finest on July 02, 2020, 06:15:43 PM
Williamson or Hill?
I brought in Williamson last week and he looked really nice. You'd have to think that Hill has the higher scoring potential, but also the potential to miss more games. If you think he'll get injured again I'd say go Williamson. Also the def/fwd flexibility of Hill is nice.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: B. on July 03, 2020, 12:41:12 PM
Lloyd v Daniel v Haynes v Ridley ?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jfitty on July 03, 2020, 12:50:29 PM
Lloyd v Daniel v Haynes v Ridley ?

Trying to split these and Maynard myself.

I'd have them in the order you do there

Lloyd is expensive, but we know his role and how he can score. Daniel very similar. Haynes will be a really consistent pick without the ceiling, and I'm not as big a fan of Ridley as others.

Keen to think where everyone sees Maynard fitting in with those 4.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on July 03, 2020, 03:08:20 PM
Lloyd v Daniel v Haynes v Ridley ?

Trying to split these and Maynard myself.

I'd have them in the order you do there

Lloyd is expensive, but we know his role and how he can score. Daniel very similar. Haynes will be a really consistent pick without the ceiling, and I'm not as big a fan of Ridley as others.

Keen to think where everyone sees Maynard fitting in with those 4.

Lloyd has a BE of 137 this week, so if you can hold off you MAY get him cheaper in a week or two. Well, that's my plan anyhow.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on July 03, 2020, 05:08:09 PM
Lloyd v Daniel v Haynes v Ridley ?

Trying to split these and Maynard myself.

I'd have them in the order you do there

Lloyd is expensive, but we know his role and how he can score. Daniel very similar. Haynes will be a really consistent pick without the ceiling, and I'm not as big a fan of Ridley as others.

Keen to think where everyone sees Maynard fitting in with those 4.

What about Saad? Any better than those options & Maynard?

The thing that worries me about Maynard is Jack Crisp is still in that team...
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: B. on July 03, 2020, 05:44:27 PM
Probably leaning towards Haynes then Lloyd in a couple
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on July 03, 2020, 07:32:20 PM
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 04, 2020, 11:44:47 AM
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
I'd go with B or C

Green v Serong v Hill
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: HoleMeal on July 04, 2020, 12:08:38 PM
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
I'd go with B or C

Green v Serong v Hill
Green- no injury risk and looked solid.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: shaker on July 04, 2020, 12:32:49 PM
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
I'd go with B or C

Green v Serong v Hill
Green- no injury risk and looked solid.
I was going to get rid of Pickett but as someone pointed out not all players will go into hub so he stays for now still think he can make some $$ so out of them D for me but still need to make a decision myself between Green and Serong today and are leaning green's way.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on July 04, 2020, 12:40:17 PM
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
I'd go with B or C

Green v Serong v Hill
Green- no injury risk and looked solid.
I was going to get rid of Pickett but as someone pointed out not all players will go into hub so he stays for now still think he can make some $$ so out of them D for me but still need to make a decision myself between Green and Serong today and are leaning green's way.
agree like the look of green, how is job security for him though?

Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: shaker on July 04, 2020, 12:47:42 PM
Which sideways trade?
A) Viney to Bontempelli
B) Pickett to Hill
C) Pickett to Serong
D) none - wait for the hub selections are confirmed
I'd go with B or C

Green v Serong v Hill
Green- no injury risk and looked solid.
I was going to get rid of Pickett but as someone pointed out not all players will go into hub so he stays for now still think he can make some $$ so out of them D for me but still need to make a decision myself between Green and Serong today and are leaning green's way.
agree like the look of green, how is job security for him though?


Yeah bit of a worry with GWS but Taranto is still a bit off and Serong looks good very solid body as well and Fyfe out for a couple now I'm confused again  ;D and just seen Ward is out with soreness so has to be Green.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on July 04, 2020, 12:59:53 PM
yeh,  i am going to sleep on it,  will trade viney to one of green/serong tomorrow.   Gives me a chance to see what richmond does with pickett and the hub.   
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: shaker on July 04, 2020, 01:03:27 PM
yeh,  i am going to sleep on it,  will trade viney to one of green/serong tomorrow.   Gives me a chance to see what richmond does with pickett and the hub.   
Got to get rid of Brander to avoid a donut so 30 minutes to make decision.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: billnats on July 05, 2020, 11:07:30 AM
Green v Serong v Hill
Stuck on this too. Hill allows that defensive cover and should play most weeks. Easy trade for BZT sitting on my bench.

Green looked so good last week but does he play regularly? Plus it’ll be Pickett making way who still has some money to make.

Serong I may stay clear of for now.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ingram on July 05, 2020, 10:37:43 PM
Viney to Mitchell or Duncan?

Only reason not going Boak yet is high BE and likely tag this week.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jfitty on July 08, 2020, 08:09:33 PM
Dangerfield vs Mitchell vs Oliver?

Rowell replacement.. Wanting to get one more proven mid in for now, then see what happens with my last two spots.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 08, 2020, 08:21:38 PM
Dangerfield vs Mitchell vs Oliver?

Rowell replacement.. Wanting to get one more proven mid in for now, then see what happens with my last two spots.

Mitchell will be the most consistent
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on July 08, 2020, 09:12:11 PM
Dangerfield vs Mitchell vs Oliver?

Rowell replacement.. Wanting to get one more proven mid in for now, then see what happens with my last two spots.

Mitchell will be the most consistent

Carrying a sore shoulder
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 08, 2020, 09:54:14 PM
Dangerfield vs Mitchell vs Oliver?

Rowell replacement.. Wanting to get one more proven mid in for now, then see what happens with my last two spots.

Mitchell will be the most consistent

Carrying a sore shoulder
Easily Mitchell
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on July 08, 2020, 10:20:58 PM
Green v Serong v Hill
Stuck on this too. Hill allows that defensive cover and should play most weeks. Easy trade for BZT sitting on my bench.

Green looked so good last week but does he play regularly? Plus it’ll be Pickett making way who still has some money to make.

Serong I may stay clear of for now.
Hill plays most weeks - if he can
Green may play - irregularly
Serong may get more games - when at home

Again it depends on the objectives, to make money buy low (rookie) sell high (cash cow)

IMO none of these are a season hold

Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: JBs-Hawks on July 08, 2020, 11:01:01 PM
Yeo or Shiel
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on July 09, 2020, 12:22:50 AM
Would be going for Shiel. He’s a big POD as everyone seems to be going for Yeo, scoring very well, and all the underlying numbers are looking good.

Looks like he’s worth the 100k more than Yeo.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: bkimm32 on July 09, 2020, 11:27:46 AM
Would be going for Shiel. He’s a big POD as everyone seems to be going for Yeo, scoring very well, and all the underlying numbers are looking good.

Looks like he’s worth the 100k more than Yeo.

Is Shiels score effected when Merrett comes back though?

Maynard V Haynes V J Lloyd
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: benharris222 on July 09, 2020, 05:42:36 PM
Riddley, Yeo or Whitfield?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 09, 2020, 06:11:57 PM
Would be going for Shiel. He’s a big POD as everyone seems to be going for Yeo, scoring very well, and all the underlying numbers are looking good.

Looks like he’s worth the 100k more than Yeo.

Is Shiels score effected when Merrett comes back though?

Maynard V Haynes V J Lloyd

FWIW I went Lloyd mainly due to him feeling like the safest bet.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 09, 2020, 06:14:26 PM
Riddley, Yeo or Whitfield?

I am going Ridley this week mainly due to him having a better chance being in top 6-8 defenders this season vs Yeo being in top 8-10 mids IMO. Ridley also has the lowest BE. I already have Whitfield and you can always get him next week because his BE is higher than Ridley's.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on July 09, 2020, 06:25:50 PM
Aarts + Lloyd vs. Whitfield + Doedee
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 09, 2020, 06:27:50 PM
Riddley, Yeo or Whitfield?

I am going Ridley this week mainly due to him having a better chance being in top 6-8 defenders this season vs Yeo being in top 8-10 mids IMO. Ridley also has the lowest BE. I already have Whitfield and you can always get him next week because his BE is higher than Ridley's.
With rivers out I have to go Ridley now. You can still get Yeo next week anyway cause he won't go up much money
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: TommyC on July 09, 2020, 06:55:27 PM
Aarts + Lloyd vs. Whitfield + Doedee
I brought in Aarts and Lloyd this week
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: HoleMeal on July 10, 2020, 06:17:26 AM
Aarts + Lloyd vs. Whitfield + Doedee
I brought in Aarts and Lloyd this week
Hard one, could go either way.
I would prob lean toward Whit/Doe only because 1 is a keeper and the other MAY end up being a keeper.
With Simpson looking good I would prefer him over Aarts.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Dmoney$ on July 10, 2020, 04:29:25 PM
Simpkin or Steele
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: OZDocker on July 10, 2020, 06:08:45 PM
I dont really know, maybe these stats might help.
Simpkin is DPP, ceiling seems greater????

(https://i.gyazo.com/56e0c8f5bf2c3235813186161686e8e7.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/ccc32cb0a11ba74e3842a1e47c9c384d.png)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Thewizz71 on July 10, 2020, 06:15:52 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.

Butler vs Hamill?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: shaker on July 10, 2020, 06:20:31 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.

Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: OZDocker on July 10, 2020, 06:26:41 PM
i think he means Louis Butler Ringo, toss a coin i reckon

(https://i.gyazo.com/55bbae71e6ba90221d40d808c9a5916d.png)
(https://i.gyazo.com/a973556b245a34c7e289f2deafe9c43a.png)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: whynot102 on July 10, 2020, 06:28:21 PM
Treloar/Simpkin or Mitchell
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: shaker on July 10, 2020, 06:28:55 PM
i think he means Louis Butler Ringo, toss a coin i reckon
Ah case of the mistaken Butler :D and don't call me Ringo
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: OZDocker on July 10, 2020, 06:32:38 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.

Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: OZDocker on July 10, 2020, 06:34:27 PM
i think he means Louis Butler Ringo, toss a coin i reckon
Ah case of the mistaken Butler :D and don't call me Ringo

oooopss, sorry dunno what i was looking at :-[ :-[ :-[ :-[
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: shaker on July 10, 2020, 06:39:04 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.

Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Both are batting above their previous avg's was leaning to Haynes geez I hate these type of choices ???
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: no eye deer on July 10, 2020, 06:48:15 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.

Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Both are batting above their previous avg's was leaning to Haynes geez I hate these type of choices ???

Same decision for me. I was all set for Haynes, but the forecast rain on the GC is leaning me back towards Maynard. Need the league win. Hope it doesn’t bite me on the arse, like most last minute trade changes do!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: shaker on July 10, 2020, 06:57:13 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.

Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Both are batting above their previous avg's was leaning to Haynes geez I hate these type of choices ???

Same decision for me. I was all set for Haynes, but the forecast rain on the GC is leaning me back towards Maynard. Need the league win. Hope it doesn’t bite me on the arse, like most last minute trade changes do!
It's a bit wet ATM in Sydney but might clear now you have me checking GC weather forecasts ;D
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: no eye deer on July 10, 2020, 08:33:38 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.

Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Both are batting above their previous avg's was leaning to Haynes geez I hate these type of choices ???

Same decision for me. I was all set for Haynes, but the forecast rain on the GC is leaning me back towards Maynard. Need the league win. Hope it doesn’t bite me on the arse, like most last minute trade changes do!
It's a bit wet ATM in Sydney but might clear now you have me checking GC weather forecasts ;D

 >:( >:( :( >:( >:(

Why don’t I ever learn?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: shaker on July 10, 2020, 09:01:19 PM
Simpkin or Steele
I have Simpkin, but Steele looks good.
Blanketing others while getting heaps of it himself. Laying a lot of tackles as well.

Butler vs Hamill?
Steele as a POD going by those stats but pretty even.
Butler is way dearer than Hamill ? so Butler if $ ain't a problem
Haynes V Maynard ?
this was my decision last week, stats are neck n neck. I went Haynes....was very happy with my 148 ;D ;D ;D
Both are batting above their previous avg's was leaning to Haynes geez I hate these type of choices ???

Same decision for me. I was all set for Haynes, but the forecast rain on the GC is leaning me back towards Maynard. Need the league win. Hope it doesn’t bite me on the arse, like most last minute trade changes do!
It's a bit wet ATM in Sydney but might clear now you have me checking GC weather forecasts ;D

 >:( >:( :( >:( >:(

Why don’t I ever learn?
I resisted him.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on July 11, 2020, 12:01:38 PM
Luke Parker vs Jack Steele and why?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 11, 2020, 12:15:13 PM
NicNat or Pittonet on field in draft?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 16, 2020, 06:22:53 PM
Trade Green (2nd time I have owned him  :'(  ) or McInerney
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Mat0369 on July 16, 2020, 06:49:14 PM
NicNat or Pittonet on field in draft?

I'm fielding Nic Nat and I have both.

Trade Green (2nd time I have owned him  :'(  ) or McInerney

It's worrying McInerney can't get a game with JPK and Heeney out, but I'd probably trade Green. You can't trust the Giants
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: shaker on July 16, 2020, 06:53:46 PM
NicNat or Pittonet on field in draft?

I'm fielding Nic Nat and I have both.

Trade Green (2nd time I have owned him  :'(  ) or McInerney

It's worrying McInerney can't get a game with JPK and Heeney out, but I'd probably trade Green. You can't trust the Giants
McInerney named E Green not bye bye Green again for me as well.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 16, 2020, 07:18:51 PM
NicNat or Pittonet on field in draft?

I'm fielding Nic Nat and I have both.

Trade Green (2nd time I have owned him  :'(  ) or McInerney

It's worrying McInerney can't get a game with JPK and Heeney out, but I'd probably trade Green. You can't trust the Giants
McInerney named E Green not bye bye Green again for me as well.
yep it hurts having to trade him again
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on July 16, 2020, 10:09:52 PM
Is Maynard score tonight the most over inflated score of the year? Done close to didly squat tonight
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Thewizz71 on July 16, 2020, 10:16:24 PM
Bennell v Pickett?
Need to play one. Thinking Pickett.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 16, 2020, 10:24:45 PM
Bennell v Pickett?
Need to play one. Thinking Pickett.
I like Bennell. Although pick pickett cause you'll regret it if he does well.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Hazza09 on July 17, 2020, 12:28:02 AM
Take Noble 62 and trade Starcevich to Rankine?
Or play Starcevich?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: benharris222 on July 17, 2020, 06:57:18 AM
Take Noble 62 and trade Starcevich to Rankine?
Or play Starcevich?

This is exactly where I'm at, at the moment. I think Starc is gone! Gives me room to double upgrade next week, and Noble should hold his spot after that. Only had one clanger, and looked clean.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Rusty00 on July 17, 2020, 08:23:08 AM
Take Noble 62 and trade Starcevich to Rankine?
Or play Starcevich?
Depends what you main goal is.

IMO Starcevich has the better JS going forward, as although his scores have been poor the last couple of weeks, he has played his role for the team. Noble was only a late in for Cox because of the weather. Could be straight out again next week. Starcevich also has DPP.

Having said that, if you are going to trade out Starcevich soon regardless, then this week is probably the week to do it. Has only had two scores significantly above 62, whilst 3 have been well below. Has only had one score for the year above his BE of 93, so significant chances he loses money this week as well

Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on July 18, 2020, 12:24:11 PM
Starcevich > Jayden short

Find me a defender or forward  worth bringing in up to 477k instead?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ingram on July 21, 2020, 12:10:18 AM
Whitfield or BSmith?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Judd Magic on July 21, 2020, 01:02:05 AM
Whitfield or BSmith?

Whitfield.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ingram on July 22, 2020, 12:01:34 AM
I took out their injury affected games. 99.5 Vs 103.6 average. Not a huge difference but it does save $61,800 and avoids the upcoming bye GWS face (though isn't really a deal breaker).
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on July 22, 2020, 06:28:55 PM
Sicily + Whitfield vs. Doedee + Taylor Adams
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on July 22, 2020, 09:11:59 PM
$508k to burn.

Coniglio vs Yeo vs Higgins
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: whynot102 on July 23, 2020, 09:15:27 AM
I have Cogs been disappointing I would go Higgins
$508k to burn.

Coniglio vs Yeo vs Higgins
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: whynot102 on July 23, 2020, 09:16:00 AM
Greenwood, Smith or Petracca
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on July 23, 2020, 09:19:21 AM
$508k to burn.

Coniglio vs Yeo vs Higgins

Triple yuck to be honest.  Either go with a top dog you don't have like Treloar, or I'd rather go Parker than any of those, or even a forward you don't have to swing later.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ingram on July 23, 2020, 01:22:25 PM
Greenwood, Smith or Petracca

Greenwood > Petracca >> Smith
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on July 23, 2020, 02:07:36 PM
ROB or English

Don't say Gawn...I'm resigned to not having him or getting him in later if the opportunity arrises, but I must get Pitto out.

Leaning towards ROB as I don't think English has a great game tonight and the extra money lets me make another upgrade.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 23, 2020, 02:48:38 PM
ROB or English

Don't say Gawn...I'm resigned to not having him or getting him in later if the opportunity arrises, but I must get Pitto out.

Leaning towards ROB as I don't think English has a great game tonight and the extra money lets me make another upgrade.

Hasn't ROB got the three G's, Gawn,Grundy,Goldy after this week's match?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jvalles69 on July 23, 2020, 02:51:50 PM
ROB or English

Don't say Gawn...I'm resigned to not having him or getting him in later if the opportunity arrises, but I must get Pitto out.

Leaning towards ROB as I don't think English has a great game tonight and the extra money lets me make another upgrade.

Hasn't ROB got the three G's, Gawn,Grundy,Goldy after this week's match?

I think they all have a combination of each other, but you could be right, I don't think that overly effects his scores though as he's not a dud ruck.

Ah you're right, and he sucked against them all last year.  :-\
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on July 23, 2020, 02:57:39 PM
Greenwood, Smith or Petracca

I would go Petracca just for the bonus points of not having a bye. Could be two tons difference right there.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 23, 2020, 06:34:11 PM
Trading Taylor or King?. Feel Taylor can score higher but also likely to lose more money.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Rusty00 on July 23, 2020, 06:57:15 PM
Trading Taylor or King?. Feel Taylor can score higher but also likely to lose more money.
Taylor's injury affected score will be out of his rolling average after this week, so his BE will go back down.

Personally I would trade King.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ingram on July 23, 2020, 09:57:31 PM
If Sturt doesn't play I can loop Budaricks 60 and put Taylor on the pine. Hoping Taylor scores well due to his BE but a guaranteed 60 is tempting.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 23, 2020, 10:25:48 PM
If Sturt doesn't play I can loop Budaricks 60 and put Taylor on the pine. Hoping Taylor scores well due to his BE but a guaranteed 60 is tempting.
I'd love Sturt to play just so he can make some cash. Id take a punt on Taylor (even though 60 is a solid score for a rookie).

I have bud on the mid bench so the only 2 rookies i can put on the bench for his score is Simpson and Pickett.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ingram on July 23, 2020, 10:41:02 PM
Realised Simpkin could be a late out so. mihht
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 23, 2020, 10:44:29 PM
Realised Simpkin could be a late out so. mihht
Id love to know before tomorrow nights game so i could switch him with Whitfield into the mids
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Ingram on July 24, 2020, 12:47:00 AM
Realised Simpkin could be a late out so. mihht
Id love to know before tomorrow nights game so i could switch him with Whitfield into the mids

Haha yes I'm doing the same is what I was trying to say.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on July 24, 2020, 10:14:57 AM
Sicily + Whitfield vs. Doedee + Taylor Adams
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 24, 2020, 10:41:00 AM
Sicily + Whitfield vs. Doedee + Taylor Adams
Sicily BE 28, Whitfield BE 67, Doedee BE 28, Adams BE 108
You can wait on Adams because his price won't go up too much.
Sicily and Whitfield most likely to be top 6 in their positions and their price will go up.
The other option is to go Whitfield and Doedee and save 90k, then get Sicily after his round 10 bye.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: North Melbournes Finest on July 24, 2020, 11:45:37 AM
Coniglio 500k
Zorko 487k
Martin 469k
Sicily 520k
Ridley 515k
Crisp 485k

I think Martin is my least favourite of those guys, but what about the other guys, which would you rather?  Looking at Zorkos last 16 scores last year he didn’t score below 85 and tonned up 12 times.

Edit - Sorry he had a 61 in there.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 24, 2020, 12:40:00 PM
Coniglio 500k
Zorko 487k
Martin 469k
Sicily 520k
Ridley 515k
Crisp 485k

I think Martin is my least favourite of those guys, but what about the other guys, which would you rather?  Looking at Zorkos last 16 scores last year he didn’t score below 85 and tonned up 12 times.

Edit - Sorry he had a 61 in there.
I'd go Sicily or Cogs. 4/5 of his last scores have been over 113. Although as a Coniglio owner I'm hoping he is beginning to find some form .
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 24, 2020, 12:55:51 PM
Coniglio 500k
Zorko 487k
Martin 469k
Sicily 520k
Ridley 515k
Crisp 485k

I think Martin is my least favourite of those guys, but what about the other guys, which would you rather?  Looking at Zorkos last 16 scores last year he didn’t score below 85 and tonned up 12 times.

Edit - Sorry he had a 61 in there.
If you don't care about his upcoming bye, then I would go Sicily because he will be the most likely to finish in the top 6 of his position out of that bunch. I also like Ridley for the fact that he has no byes and could finish in the top 6-8 defenders.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: North Melbournes Finest on July 24, 2020, 01:33:23 PM
Thanks for your advice guys. I’m starting to like Coniglio. He has some stinkers but he’s very unlikely to be tagged with the other GWS Jets, he never has to face up against De Boer. I also think that this is a year where you should look for guys that are priced well below their potential, not when they’re at their price high for what they can produce. Like Stewart and Duncan are upcoming guys who will be well priced below their actual average. Think I’ll go with Nigs.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: duff100au on July 24, 2020, 01:41:24 PM
Short v crisp?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: HoleMeal on July 24, 2020, 02:24:47 PM
Short v crisp?
Crisp.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on July 24, 2020, 05:46:31 PM
Thanks for your advice guys. I’m starting to like Coniglio. He has some stinkers but he’s very unlikely to be tagged with the other GWS Jets, he never has to face up against De Boer. I also think that this is a year where you should look for guys that are priced well below their potential, not when they’re at their price high for what they can produce. Like Stewart and Duncan are upcoming guys who will be well priced below their actual average. Think I’ll go with Nigs.
thought cogs was spending time up forward
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on July 24, 2020, 05:52:35 PM
ROB or English

Don't say Gawn...I'm resigned to not having him or getting him in later if the opportunity arrises, but I must get Pitto out.

Leaning towards ROB as I don't think English has a great game tonight and the extra money lets me make another upgrade.
hope you went ROB jv
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: jfitty on July 24, 2020, 06:07:52 PM
How about Mayes vs Simpson?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on July 24, 2020, 06:09:02 PM
How about Mayes vs Simpson?
Simpson
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: timtim on July 24, 2020, 06:57:18 PM
I know diff positions but Mitch Georgiades or Will Day?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on July 24, 2020, 06:59:39 PM
I know diff positions but Mitch Georgiades or Will Day?

Day no contest. Georgie is could very well be a one week special appearance...I don't see him keeping Westhoff out unless he does something special.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on July 25, 2020, 10:08:27 AM
Simpson or Bennel?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: duff100au on July 25, 2020, 10:10:24 AM
Got a new one

Crisp v Luke Ryan?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: HoleMeal on July 25, 2020, 10:16:43 AM
Got a new one

Crisp v Luke Ryan?
I have had Ryan the last 2 seasons. A little but of the ups n downs.
If priced the same I would go Crisp, although prob not as high of a ceiling.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: HoleMeal on July 25, 2020, 10:17:35 AM
Simpson or Bennel?
Surely Simpson sees more of it with the Cat's outs.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: timtim on July 25, 2020, 11:25:29 AM
Got a new one

Crisp v Luke Ryan?
I have had Ryan the last 2 seasons. A little but of the ups n downs.
If priced the same I would go Crisp, although prob not as high of a ceiling.

Crisp

Ryan too up and down for me
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 25, 2020, 11:31:38 AM
Got a new one

Crisp v Luke Ryan?
I have had Ryan the last 2 seasons. A little but of the ups n downs.
If priced the same I would go Crisp, although prob not as high of a ceiling.

Crisp

Ryan too up and down for me

Agree, Ryan can pump out a few low scores from time to time.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: SilverLion on July 27, 2020, 12:43:02 AM
Sicily + Whitfield vs. Doedee + Taylor Adams
Sicily BE 28, Whitfield BE 67, Doedee BE 28, Adams BE 108
You can wait on Adams because his price won't go up too much.
Sicily and Whitfield most likely to be top 6 in their positions and their price will go up.
The other option is to go Whitfield and Doedee and save 90k, then get Sicily after his round 10 bye.
Ended up going Sicily and Whitfield.

First bit of good luck I've had all year.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 27, 2020, 12:29:12 PM
Sicily + Whitfield vs. Doedee + Taylor Adams
Sicily BE 28, Whitfield BE 67, Doedee BE 28, Adams BE 108
You can wait on Adams because his price won't go up too much.
Sicily and Whitfield most likely to be top 6 in their positions and their price will go up.
The other option is to go Whitfield and Doedee and save 90k, then get Sicily after his round 10 bye.
Ended up going Sicily and Whitfield.

First bit of good luck I've had all year.

It was the smartest move, getting two of the best top 6 in their respective positions and at low BE's. Well done!
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: IntegralX on July 28, 2020, 12:40:58 AM
Ridley vs Daniel

Parker vs Gaff vs Zerrett
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on July 29, 2020, 07:51:11 AM
Ridley vs Daniel

Parker vs Gaff vs Zerrett

Prob Daniel > Ridley (just). I have Ridley and very happy but Daniel does have potential tonget a lot of the ball
Gaff > Parker > Zerrett
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on July 29, 2020, 07:54:15 AM
Treloar vs Macrae vs Josh Kelly
Greene vs Bailey Smith (worth the extra $70k)?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: North Melbournes Finest on July 29, 2020, 09:58:17 AM
Lloyd 590k - 115 ave
Haynes 550k - 111 ave
Ridley 520k - 110 ave
Saad 490k - 102ave

Genuinely torn up on this one. I'd love to bring in Lloyd, but for that much more than Haynes and Ridley is he worth spending all that extra money?

Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 29, 2020, 11:44:25 AM
Lloyd 590k - 115 ave
Haynes 550k - 111 ave
Ridley 520k - 110 ave
Saad 490k - 102ave

Genuinely torn up on this one. I'd love to bring in Lloyd, but for that much more than Haynes and Ridley is he worth spending all that extra money?

You have to get Lloyd at some stage, but maybe wait until after his round 11 bye.
With Haynes, not sure how Zach Williams will impact him, and he also has a bye in round 11.
Ridley and Saad both have the benefit of no byes, but Ridley is better IMO. He has gone under 100 twice and his lowest score has been 92. Saad's lowest score has been 80.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 29, 2020, 11:49:41 AM
Treloar vs Macrae vs Josh Kelly
Greene vs Bailey Smith (worth the extra $70k)?
Macrae easily due to durability, then Kelly, Treloar. I think Treloar might be managed at some point given condensed schedule. Kelly also has the bye in round 11.

Bailey Smith a no-brainer over Toby Greene. The $70k savings is huge and Toby misses way too many games.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 29, 2020, 12:23:28 PM
Williamson with BE of 66 and will drop in price and he has a bye coming up. He has to go. Who will replace him?

McPherson or McKay
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on July 29, 2020, 02:45:26 PM
Close vs Georgiades

Consider JS, scoring potential as well as price.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Dmoney$ on July 29, 2020, 02:49:28 PM
Lads I’m really needing a bit of advice

I still haven’t cashed in on my
Emergency ruck Naismith and Ive already got Grundy and Gawn.
My question is, is it worth getting someone like Draper who is talked about as possibly getting a game soon who could potentially make me a bit of coin or just maximise the cash I could get now and get Conroy at 102k saving me 20k?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 29, 2020, 09:32:56 PM
Lads I’m really needing a bit of advice

I still haven’t cashed in on my
Emergency ruck Naismith and Ive already got Grundy and Gawn.
My question is, is it worth getting someone like Draper who is talked about as possibly getting a game soon who could potentially make me a bit of coin or just maximise the cash I could get now and get Conroy at 102k saving me 20k?
I'd only pick Draper if he was named. If you are desperate for a rookie ruckman you could get Brooksby if he is named.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tkringle on July 29, 2020, 09:37:03 PM
Pick two to play out of  Georgiades, Taylor and Close?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 29, 2020, 09:39:44 PM
Pick two to play out of  Georgiades, Taylor and Close?
I'd field Georgiades then one of Taylor or Close. I'm leaning towards Taylor as roos are playing crows.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: duff100au on July 29, 2020, 10:27:31 PM
Parker v Duncan v Merrett
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Rusty00 on July 30, 2020, 08:52:10 AM
Parker v Duncan v Merrett
I'm picking Duncan as I don't have any other Geelong players. That's the only way I'm splitting him and Parker at the moment.

Although Merrett has already had a bye, I don't trust him as much as the other two. Duncan is cheap because of injury whereas Merrett is cheap because of 2 scores of 78, 68 for no real reason. Merrett also more likely to get attention, particularly after his big game last week.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 30, 2020, 11:14:31 AM
Parker v Duncan v Merrett
I'm picking Duncan as I don't have any other Geelong players. That's the only way I'm splitting him and Parker at the moment.

Although Merrett has already had a bye, I don't trust him as much as the other two. Duncan is cheap because of injury whereas Merrett is cheap because of 2 scores of 78, 68 for no real reason. Merrett also more likely to get attention, particularly after his big game last week.

+1  Added to that, Parker's next three rounds include Steele and DeBoer possible tags and a bye.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Woppa15 on July 30, 2020, 03:21:41 PM
Tobe Watson vs Andrew McPherson. A little skinny down back and really need them to play in the coming weeks......
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Fid on July 30, 2020, 03:38:24 PM
Tobe Watson vs Andrew McPherson. A little skinny down back and really need them to play in the coming weeks......

I am also a little thin down back and I am going Watson (if selected) for max money in the kitty, McPherson on the other hand may of better JS
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Rusty00 on July 30, 2020, 04:03:11 PM
Tobe Watson vs Andrew McPherson. A little skinny down back and really need them to play in the coming weeks......
At this stage I'm going McPherson. Would love the extra money but I reckon McPherson's JS is pretty good which is what I need for a D7 to avoid anymore donuts down back, like last week.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 30, 2020, 04:22:17 PM
Noble v Starc. Trading 1 this week and the other next week. Am fielding which ever one i keep.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Fid on July 30, 2020, 04:38:01 PM
Noble v Starc. Trading 1 this week and the other next week. Am fielding which ever one i keep.

Noble BE = 64

Starcevich  BE = 49

Really tough call.....
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on July 30, 2020, 05:31:43 PM
Noble v Starc. Trading 1 this week and the other next week. Am fielding which ever one i keep.

Noble BE = 64

Starcevich  BE = 49

Really tough call.....
So it's Noble vs Fremantle in Perth or Starcevich vs Essendon in Carrara. No rain for both games. Starcevich is based in Queensland. Noble far away from home. Starcevich lower BE. I would go Starcevich.

Starcevich averages 67 in QLD. Last week he only scored 48 at the venue he is playing this week but it was in the wet.

Noble averaging 54 at Optus.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on July 30, 2020, 05:51:21 PM
Lads I’m really needing a bit of advice

I still haven’t cashed in on my
Emergency ruck Naismith and Ive already got Grundy and Gawn.
My question is, is it worth getting someone like Draper who is talked about as possibly getting a game soon who could potentially make me a bit of coin or just maximise the cash I could get now and get Conroy at 102k saving me 20k?
I'd only pick Draper if he was named. If you are desperate for a rookie ruckman you could get Brooksby if he is named.
Brooksby @ $117.3K would be a good choice IMO
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 30, 2020, 06:20:33 PM
Lads I’m really needing a bit of advice

I still haven’t cashed in on my
Emergency ruck Naismith and Ive already got Grundy and Gawn.
My question is, is it worth getting someone like Draper who is talked about as possibly getting a game soon who could potentially make me a bit of coin or just maximise the cash I could get now and get Conroy at 102k saving me 20k?
I'd only pick Draper if he was named. If you are desperate for a rookie ruckman you could get Brooksby if he is named.
Brooksby @ $117.3K would be a good choice IMO
Get Draper now
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on July 30, 2020, 06:21:25 PM
Noble v Starc. Trading 1 this week and the other next week. Am fielding which ever one i keep.

Noble BE = 64

Starcevich  BE = 49

Really tough call.....
So it's Noble vs Fremantle in Perth or Starcevich vs Essendon in Carrara. No rain for both games. Starcevich is based in Queensland. Noble far away from home. Starcevich lower BE. I would go Starcevich.

Starcevich averages 67 in QLD. Last week he only scored 48 at the venue he is playing this week but it was in the wet.

Noble averaging 54 at Optus.
Thanks mate
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on July 30, 2020, 06:25:24 PM
Lads I’m really needing a bit of advice

I still haven’t cashed in on my
Emergency ruck Naismith and Ive already got Grundy and Gawn.
My question is, is it worth getting someone like Draper who is talked about as possibly getting a game soon who could potentially make me a bit of coin or just maximise the cash I could get now and get Conroy at 102k saving me 20k?
I'd only pick Draper if he was named. If you are desperate for a rookie ruckman you could get Brooksby if he is named.
Brooksby @ $117.3K would be a good choice IMO
Looks like Draper now :)
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on August 04, 2020, 01:41:14 PM
Can only get one of Stewart or Duncan.

Have one spot left in defence, but I prefer Haynes over Stewart, but Stewart very cheap.

Have 3 spots left in mids, so Duncan will be handy.

Who would you get?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: tommy10 on August 04, 2020, 01:41:55 PM
Stewart vs Duncan?

I have 5 keepers already in defence, but don't have Haynes, Maynard, Daniel. If I get Stewart, then I give up on Haynes, who is the one I really want, but Stewart is cheap.

I only have 5 keepers in the mids, so Duncan will come in handy, and will leave me with two mid spots to see who the best available will be in the next few weeks.

Leaning towards Duncan, even though Stewart is so cheap.
I’d go for Duncan mate. As you said you only have 5 keepers in the mids, so that’s a no brainer. Looking at his scores you can’t go past him. Stewart is a good pick too but you should still get him next week for around 500k..
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on August 04, 2020, 02:13:02 PM
Stewart vs Duncan?

I have 5 keepers already in defence, but don't have Haynes, Maynard, Daniel. If I get Stewart, then I give up on Haynes, who is the one I really want, but Stewart is cheap.

I only have 5 keepers in the mids, so Duncan will come in handy, and will leave me with two mid spots to see who the best available will be in the next few weeks.

Leaning towards Duncan, even though Stewart is so cheap.
I’d go for Duncan mate. As you said you only have 5 keepers in the mids, so that’s a no brainer. Looking at his scores you can’t go past him. Stewart is a good pick too but you should still get him next week for around 500k..
Yeah, I agree. Thanks for the advice.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: MontyJnr on August 04, 2020, 05:48:29 PM
It's looking like I'll have to keep 1 of Hurn or Doedee for the rest of the season. Both have a bye to come.

Who is likely to score more from here?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on August 04, 2020, 06:25:19 PM
Mitch Duncan vs Dustin Martin!?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: whynot102 on August 04, 2020, 09:29:02 PM
Duncan
Mitch Duncan vs Dustin Martin!?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Wanderer on August 06, 2020, 12:27:52 PM
Stewart vs Duncan?

I have 5 keepers already in defence, but don't have Haynes, Maynard, Daniel. If I get Stewart, then I give up on Haynes, who is the one I really want, but Stewart is cheap.

I only have 5 keepers in the mids, so Duncan will come in handy, and will leave me with two mid spots to see who the best available will be in the next few weeks.

Leaning towards Duncan, even though Stewart is so cheap.
I’d go for Duncan mate. As you said you only have 5 keepers in the mids, so that’s a no brainer. Looking at his scores you can’t go past him. Stewart is a good pick too but you should still get him next week for around 500k..
Yeah, I agree. Thanks for the advice.
Was a good call. Duncan, although didn't set the world on fire, still managed to score over 100 whilst Stewart had a below par game.

Stewart will remain cheap for those who still want to get him next week.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: frenzy on August 06, 2020, 02:25:12 PM
It's looking like I'll have to keep 1 of Hurn or Doedee for the rest of the season. Both have a bye to come.

Who is likely to score more from here?

Doedee, if he can stay on the park.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on August 06, 2020, 03:02:05 PM
It's looking like I'll have to keep 1 of Hurn or Doedee for the rest of the season. Both have a bye to come.

Who is likely to score more from here?

Doedee, if he can stay on the park.
I have been expecting for Hurns scoring to deteriorate in the last few years but it hadn't happened. Although Hurn is more durable than Doedee, he has only scored now once over 100 since rd 1 compared to doedee's 4.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: zac-ster on August 07, 2020, 04:58:47 PM
Shuey Vs T.Adams?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on August 07, 2020, 05:42:35 PM
Shuey Vs T.Adams?
Shuey based on just having his bye
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: zac-ster on August 08, 2020, 07:37:47 AM
Saad Vs Maynard
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on August 08, 2020, 08:02:11 AM
Shuey [$488k] vs Simpkin [$397k]
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: zac-ster on August 08, 2020, 09:00:29 AM
Shuey 110 ave if you remove the game when he did his hammy
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: RoughRed on August 08, 2020, 09:06:50 AM
Shuey [$488k] vs Simpkin [$397k]
Shuey
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: whynot102 on August 08, 2020, 10:25:07 AM
Shuey or Gaff
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: MontyJnr on August 08, 2020, 10:55:45 AM
Rankine & Ruscoe vs Budarick & Watson
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on August 08, 2020, 01:28:19 PM
Shuey or Gaff
shuey

Rankine & Ruscoe vs Budarick & Watson

Rankine and Ruscoe
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Blues Blues Blues on August 08, 2020, 01:28:37 PM
Shuey or Gaff

Shuey looks more consistent than Gaff to me
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on August 08, 2020, 01:30:40 PM
Shuey + Wingard + dead rookie v Titch + Rankine + Watson
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Hoggyz_a_legend on August 08, 2020, 02:01:36 PM
Are Cripps and Shuey right now worth it over bringing in only one of Macrae/Oliver? Would have one more mid upgrade to make if I go Cripps/Shuey route.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: whynot102 on August 08, 2020, 02:43:54 PM
Mitchell or Fyfe
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on August 08, 2020, 02:47:12 PM
Mitchell or Fyfe
Mitchell. Fyfe is injury prone and still possibly has money to lose
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on August 08, 2020, 08:39:31 PM
Are Cripps and Shuey right now worth it over bringing in only one of Macrae/Oliver? Would have one more mid upgrade to make if I go Cripps/Shuey route.
name of the game is buy low sell high.   take shuey/cripps
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on August 09, 2020, 12:04:01 AM
Are Cripps and Shuey right now worth it over bringing in only one of Macrae/Oliver? Would have one more mid upgrade to make if I go Cripps/Shuey route.
name of the game is buy low sell high.   take shuey/cripps
Also value for money. Even though Neale has been expensive, since i finally two weeks ago he has provided me with 2 captain scores.
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: backpocket on August 09, 2020, 03:28:08 PM
Greenwood or brayshaw?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: barlowlove on August 10, 2020, 03:04:36 PM
Greenwood or brayshaw?

I'd go Brayshaw. Already had his bye, Greenwood's level seems to be slipping (no tons last 3 wks).

Zerrett (no bye) vs Mitch Duncan?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: Samsturmfels on August 10, 2020, 05:10:34 PM
Ruscoe v Bytel?

Picking Ruscoe will allow me to swing him back to the backline in the future, although even though i havent seen him play i feel Bytel would be a better scorer. Thoughts?
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: crowls on August 10, 2020, 05:51:45 PM
Ruscoe v Bytel?

Picking Ruscoe will allow me to swing him back to the backline in the future, although even though i havent seen him play i feel Bytel would be a better scorer. Thoughts?
reason i went ruscoe was for the dpp to def,  i have close for dpp to fwds.   coming into more byes, more resting players etc I want max flexibility.    not sure what the points benefit or cash benefit could be calculated as and in six years of sc i have learnt flexiblity in team can cover a lot of holes/sins
Title: Re: 2020 Player X v Player y
Post by: sidvicious on August 11, 2020, 11:00:03 AM
shoenberg vs ruscoe