Quote from: Rids on January 19, 2016, 03:52:53 PMWe had Matty James from Footy Prophet on our podcast last week and were discussing the guys who should have had DPP allocated. I dont mind either way tbh but I am totally against any positions that are added in the season being allowed.Yep
We had Matty James from Footy Prophet on our podcast last week and were discussing the guys who should have had DPP allocated. I dont mind either way tbh but I am totally against any positions that are added in the season being allowed.
Issue is we are using UF to do draw and allow you you to pick teams each week and load into UF as per decision reached. That is why I said for simplicity to match their initial DPP and lock at Round 1 which we can do. I am using as much of the features available in UF to make my job as administrator as simple as possible after spending nearly 8hrs a week last year updating scores etc.
Why can't we keep it the same as CD? If you have Griffin, just play him as a mid and not a defender. It is literally that easy. No player is given a position that he can't play in CD so we should keep it as it has always been and stick to CD positions.
Do not think you realise with going UF and customising we get to use their scoring systems and saves me a great deal of work as I will explain.1) You will be lodging your team each week in UF and no need to lodge in thread. Any penalties involved will be done off line.2) we will be using a UF draft which I will load so each franchise has their nominated players. No trading will be allowed.3) We will be using the draw as devised by UF each week.4) Will apply HGA as appropriate off line - If we were to go back to CD I would have to check each week to ensure rules are not being flaunted, believe me there are time when this is the case. So my recommendation for simplicity is to use the 173 DPP from UF. Will make our competition further unique from others.
Quote from: Spite on January 19, 2016, 04:02:00 PMWhy can't we keep it the same as CD? If you have Griffin, just play him as a mid and not a defender. It is literally that easy. No player is given a position that he can't play in CD so we should keep it as it has always been and stick to CD positions.CD's reasoning to positions this year was completely retarded. They based positions and DPP based on where they were NAMED before the match. Not roles that they actually played. Griffen missed out on DEF status because he was named in the backline 33% of the time, but had to be named 35% of the time to be given DEF status. Then if you look at his heat map, it's about 50% of his disposal was in the back 50. And about 75% in the back half. So CD isn't that great to follow.
Quote from: Pkbaldy on January 19, 2016, 04:23:11 PMQuote from: Spite on January 19, 2016, 04:02:00 PMWhy can't we keep it the same as CD? If you have Griffin, just play him as a mid and not a defender. It is literally that easy. No player is given a position that he can't play in CD so we should keep it as it has always been and stick to CD positions.CD's reasoning to positions this year was completely retarded. They based positions and DPP based on where they were NAMED before the match. Not roles that they actually played. Griffen missed out on DEF status because he was named in the backline 33% of the time, but had to be named 35% of the time to be given DEF status. Then if you look at his heat map, it's about 50% of his disposal was in the back 50. And about 75% in the back half. So CD isn't that great to follow. Where did you read this? Can I please have the link as I am very interested by that, thanks.
Quote from: Spite on January 19, 2016, 04:33:29 PMQuote from: Pkbaldy on January 19, 2016, 04:23:11 PMQuote from: Spite on January 19, 2016, 04:02:00 PMWhy can't we keep it the same as CD? If you have Griffin, just play him as a mid and not a defender. It is literally that easy. No player is given a position that he can't play in CD so we should keep it as it has always been and stick to CD positions.CD's reasoning to positions this year was completely retarded. They based positions and DPP based on where they were NAMED before the match. Not roles that they actually played. Griffen missed out on DEF status because he was named in the backline 33% of the time, but had to be named 35% of the time to be given DEF status. Then if you look at his heat map, it's about 50% of his disposal was in the back 50. And about 75% in the back half. So CD isn't that great to follow. Where did you read this? Can I please have the link as I am very interested by that, thanks.I think Rico posted it somewhere
When I kindly asked for 1% and spoiler stats. You told me to find them myself. So I will leave you to find them! They've actually been said on the forum itself, but if you're really struggling i'd try twitter. Pretty easy to find them there