I'll also add that I'm not trying to gang up on you or anything Spite, just want to know if there are any decent reasons not to use UF
Quote from: Ringo on January 19, 2016, 05:28:13 PMBear in mind also this may assist teams that have been effected by the WADA suspensions.How so?Will those teams get less "rewards" if we go to a top up player draft?I know it helps whoever has Goddard...
Bear in mind also this may assist teams that have been effected by the WADA suspensions.
For Heavens sake stop trying to side track this discussion by bringing in other factors and not sticking to the facts. the Stanton and Heppell will be addressed with the mini draft as decided so no need to bring them into this discussion.Only trying to work out which DPP we use and the consensus so far is go with UF with players locked at Round 1.
If its no extra work why not just leave as is though? We have always used CD possies in this comp, why change it? It was used for the original fantasy comp that this XV comp was based on
That was because Sportal used CD now we are changing to UF we should be governed by them. None of you have been involved in Admin to know how much has been involved over the years. If you want to use CD then go to the other xvs. We have an opportunity to get something unique and because you do not benefit you seem to be against every enhancement we try to do to make the competition fairer. So you need to consider the whole competition not the Hedgehogs which I as administrator do.JB you have not read the whole discussion on this as it was my original suggestion tto try and keep the admin job a little easier.
Quote from: GoLions on January 19, 2016, 06:05:49 PMI'll also add that I'm not trying to gang up on you or anything Spite, just want to know if there are any decent reasons not to use UF Sure GL. We have traded and used movements based on the positions of the players we had and which players were available. For example, trading for Geary because he was the 21st best defender etc and we think he is worth this price. If theres more defenders added, then we have overpaid for him. Thats just an example.We could have thrown the house with picks and all at Goddard if we knew he was going to get def status too. It's just a big change to happen after we have done a draft and trade period.
Also your response to JB is quite mean. I think he did read it and he gave his opinion and you shut it down because you didn't agree with it. There was nothing he said that showed he hadn't read through the thread.
Quote from: Spite on January 19, 2016, 06:23:01 PMQuote from: GoLions on January 19, 2016, 06:05:49 PMI'll also add that I'm not trying to gang up on you or anything Spite, just want to know if there are any decent reasons not to use UF Sure GL. We have traded and used movements based on the positions of the players we had and which players were available. For example, trading for Geary because he was the 21st best defender etc and we think he is worth this price. If theres more defenders added, then we have overpaid for him. Thats just an example.We could have thrown the house with picks and all at Goddard if we knew he was going to get def status too. It's just a big change to happen after we have done a draft and trade period. And you have like 14 movements to go after any player you want. I have plenty of defenders if you'd like to start talks again of a possible trade. I'm sure others are happy to trade as well, particularly anyone with excess midfielders after you lost Stanton.
None of you have been involved in Admin to know how much has been involved over the years. If you want to use CD then go to the other xvs.
I'm not against enhancing the comp, i'm against changes that affect to core of the comp that most of us have been apart of for ages.
Use CDs position none of this bullshower UF positions. Just trust that Goddard and Griffens owners play them as mids.Funny how it is the Goddard and a Griffen owners that are most keen for this .
We don't even need discussion on this, it should be Ringos decision with whatever makes it easiest for him. Quote from: Spite on January 19, 2016, 06:29:22 PMAlso your response to JB is quite mean. I think he did read it and he gave his opinion and you shut it down because you didn't agree with it. There was nothing he said that showed he hadn't read through the thread.Did you actually read what he wrote? Pretty clear he didn't read it
Fair enough if you feel that way Spite but I am only trying to answer your objections to going to UF which I am strongly in favour of now that the decision was made to go that way.
It will be extra work for me to verify the teams being played each week. With UF everything is able to be done within that platform each week (with the exception of HGA) so is very easy. Do not want the added task of verifying that there have been no players playing out of position which can not happen under UF. You use Sportsbet in AXV which translates across CD. If Sportsbet had their own DPP what would you do would you want to do a heap of stuff offline just to continue CD.