Quote from: GoLions on January 19, 2016, 06:29:36 PMQuote from: Spite on January 19, 2016, 06:23:01 PMQuote from: GoLions on January 19, 2016, 06:05:49 PMI'll also add that I'm not trying to gang up on you or anything Spite, just want to know if there are any decent reasons not to use UF Sure GL. We have traded and used movements based on the positions of the players we had and which players were available. For example, trading for Geary because he was the 21st best defender etc and we think he is worth this price. If theres more defenders added, then we have overpaid for him. Thats just an example.We could have thrown the house with picks and all at Goddard if we knew he was going to get def status too. It's just a big change to happen after we have done a draft and trade period. And you have like 14 movements to go after any player you want. I have plenty of defenders if you'd like to start talks again of a possible trade. I'm sure others are happy to trade as well, particularly anyone with excess midfielders after you lost Stanton.Sure we could have but we would like to add picks into a trade with a player to improve on the said player. It completely hampers our trading opportunities because we have to fork out more for the same player.
Quote from: Spite on January 19, 2016, 06:23:01 PMQuote from: GoLions on January 19, 2016, 06:05:49 PMI'll also add that I'm not trying to gang up on you or anything Spite, just want to know if there are any decent reasons not to use UF Sure GL. We have traded and used movements based on the positions of the players we had and which players were available. For example, trading for Geary because he was the 21st best defender etc and we think he is worth this price. If theres more defenders added, then we have overpaid for him. Thats just an example.We could have thrown the house with picks and all at Goddard if we knew he was going to get def status too. It's just a big change to happen after we have done a draft and trade period. And you have like 14 movements to go after any player you want. I have plenty of defenders if you'd like to start talks again of a possible trade. I'm sure others are happy to trade as well, particularly anyone with excess midfielders after you lost Stanton.
Quote from: GoLions on January 19, 2016, 06:05:49 PMI'll also add that I'm not trying to gang up on you or anything Spite, just want to know if there are any decent reasons not to use UF Sure GL. We have traded and used movements based on the positions of the players we had and which players were available. For example, trading for Geary because he was the 21st best defender etc and we think he is worth this price. If theres more defenders added, then we have overpaid for him. Thats just an example.We could have thrown the house with picks and all at Goddard if we knew he was going to get def status too. It's just a big change to happen after we have done a draft and trade period.
I'll also add that I'm not trying to gang up on you or anything Spite, just want to know if there are any decent reasons not to use UF
It will be extra work for me to verify the teams being played each week. With UF everything is able to be done within that platform each week (with the exception of HGA) so is very easy. Do not want the added task of verifying that there have been no players playing out of position which can not happen under UF. You use Sportsbet in AXV which translates across CD. If Sportsbet had their own DPP what would you do would you want to do a heap of stuff offline just to continue CD.
Pity the core of this comp was the scoring system which we have had to change already twice now so now we are basically making the move over to UF which should include following the players positions they use however locking them in at round 1 for the year.
From an outsiders view, to me it looks like ringo does the most work of the all the admins. (Thats just my opinion, could be wrong, feel free to differ.) Shouldn't we all just agree to do what makes the job easy for him?The only argument I can pick up is that we're changing the core of the comp too much, but why does that mater, we've all ready changed it a heap?If 13 positional changes are so bad, how about we just lock in positions and never change a players position throughout their career.
Quote from: LF on January 19, 2016, 06:59:46 PMPity the core of this comp was the scoring system which we have had to change already twice now so now we are basically making the move over to UF which should include following the players positions they use however locking them in at round 1 for the year.Quote from: nrich102 on January 19, 2016, 06:58:15 PMFrom an outsiders view, to me it looks like ringo does the most work of the all the admins. (Thats just my opinion, could be wrong, feel free to differ.) Shouldn't we all just agree to do what makes the job easy for him?The only argument I can pick up is that we're changing the core of the comp too much, but why does that mater, we've all ready changed it a heap?If 13 positional changes are so bad, how about we just lock in positions and never change a players position throughout their career.Are you both seriously suggesting that it doesn't matter if we change the core because we have changed it so much already - when we are literally in the middle of reverting the comp back to the original core? My godNrich, please. Ask holz how much he spent per week doing the fixtures and the scores and it was just as much as Ringo. They all do roughly the same. The AXV mods (Hi Rico) has to enter literally every AXV score. I'm not going to comment on your other suggestion about perma-locking positions for their entire career either.
Quote from: Ringo on January 19, 2016, 06:22:23 PMThat was because Sportal used CD now we are changing to UF we should be governed by them. None of you have been involved in Admin to know how much has been involved over the years. If you want to use CD then go to the other xvs. We have an opportunity to get something unique and because you do not benefit you seem to be against every enhancement we try to do to make the competition fairer. So you need to consider the whole competition not the Hedgehogs which I as administrator do.JB you have not read the whole discussion on this as it was my original suggestion tto try and keep the admin job a little easier.That's quite rich Ringo, have a look over at EXV and see what's going on there.I feel like most of your suggestions after your original post have seemingly targeted me too. If you'd like another example of what I organise for the forum, have a look at the front bar ultimate footy thread. I also run a keepers EPL league by myself for others.Also your response to JB is quite mean. I think he did read it and he gave his opinion and you shut it down because you didn't agree with it. There was nothing he said that showed he hadn't read through the thread.
That was because Sportal used CD now we are changing to UF we should be governed by them. None of you have been involved in Admin to know how much has been involved over the years. If you want to use CD then go to the other xvs. We have an opportunity to get something unique and because you do not benefit you seem to be against every enhancement we try to do to make the competition fairer. So you need to consider the whole competition not the Hedgehogs which I as administrator do.JB you have not read the whole discussion on this as it was my original suggestion tto try and keep the admin job a little easier.
Quote from: Spite on January 19, 2016, 06:29:22 PMQuote from: Ringo on January 19, 2016, 06:22:23 PMThat was because Sportal used CD now we are changing to UF we should be governed by them. None of you have been involved in Admin to know how much has been involved over the years. If you want to use CD then go to the other xvs. We have an opportunity to get something unique and because you do not benefit you seem to be against every enhancement we try to do to make the competition fairer. So you need to consider the whole competition not the Hedgehogs which I as administrator do.JB you have not read the whole discussion on this as it was my original suggestion tto try and keep the admin job a little easier.That's quite rich Ringo, have a look over at EXV and see what's going on there.I feel like most of your suggestions after your original post have seemingly targeted me too. If you'd like another example of what I organise for the forum, have a look at the front bar ultimate footy thread. I also run a keepers EPL league by myself for others.Also your response to JB is quite mean. I think he did read it and he gave his opinion and you shut it down because you didn't agree with it. There was nothing he said that showed he hadn't read through the thread.Spot on Spite I did read over it all and gave my opinion.
Can people stop taking shots at each other and just post reasons why we should or should not use the UF positions. So far it's basically that it makes things slightly easier for Ringo, but it also slightly changes the core of the comp.I really couldn't care less which system we go with, and I'll continue to not really be that fussed unless someone gives a really good reason to use or not use UF positioning
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on January 19, 2016, 08:42:06 PMQuote from: Spite on January 19, 2016, 06:29:22 PMQuote from: Ringo on January 19, 2016, 06:22:23 PMThat was because Sportal used CD now we are changing to UF we should be governed by them. None of you have been involved in Admin to know how much has been involved over the years. If you want to use CD then go to the other xvs. We have an opportunity to get something unique and because you do not benefit you seem to be against every enhancement we try to do to make the competition fairer. So you need to consider the whole competition not the Hedgehogs which I as administrator do.JB you have not read the whole discussion on this as it was my original suggestion tto try and keep the admin job a little easier.That's quite rich Ringo, have a look over at EXV and see what's going on there.I feel like most of your suggestions after your original post have seemingly targeted me too. If you'd like another example of what I organise for the forum, have a look at the front bar ultimate footy thread. I also run a keepers EPL league by myself for others.Also your response to JB is quite mean. I think he did read it and he gave his opinion and you shut it down because you didn't agree with it. There was nothing he said that showed he hadn't read through the thread.Spot on Spite I did read over it all and gave my opinion. Well this comment to me said you did not"Funny how it is the Goddard and a Griffen owners that are most keen for this ."There are more than those 2 interested in following the UF scoring as has been show through out the thread. And for the record I do not benefit at all from either this change or the proposed mini draft.