FanFooty   FanFooty
Australian Rules
Fantasy Football
Blog Forum App
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Name: Pwd: Login for:

    Advanced search
Home Help Login Register
+  FanFooty Forum
|-+  General sports discussion
| |-+  AFL (Moderators: LF, LaHug, Ringo)
| | |-+  Should Essendon be eligible for No 1 Draft Pick.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Should Essendon be eligible for No 1 Draft Pick.  (Read 4992 times)
Jukes
Veteran Coach
****
Offline Offline



rosetta stone...

« Reply #75 on: August 28, 2016, 03:29:27 PM »

Take away the lions' #1 pick for tanking. Not manning up Rooey better defies belief (like how we didn't tag Rich, but shhhhh).
Logged
PowerBug
Chat/forum mods
Seasoned Coach
*****
Offline Offline


2017 Ranks: SC - 281, AF - 287

« Reply #76 on: August 28, 2016, 03:30:45 PM »

Now it gets difficult for the Saints/Bombers. Two in a minute for Josh Walker :(
Logged
fanTCfool
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



« Reply #77 on: August 28, 2016, 03:32:10 PM »

Brisbane going to score more than the table allows!  :'(
Logged
kilbluff1985
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



« Reply #78 on: August 28, 2016, 03:33:33 PM »

i really want Mcluggage
Logged
GoLions
Master Coach
*****
Online Online



Get around the Kate Upton Cobras!

« Reply #79 on: August 28, 2016, 03:33:41 PM »

Sauce, please take out Nroo right now :'(
Logged
Jukes
Veteran Coach
****
Offline Offline



rosetta stone...

« Reply #80 on: August 28, 2016, 03:57:00 PM »

Cheers for McCluggage and Jaeger Brissy
Logged
Holz
2017 WXV PremIEr
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



Dublin "Pride In Excellence"

« Reply #81 on: August 31, 2016, 12:32:45 PM »

ok so im anti bombers but clearly they deserve the pick where they finished on the ladder in 2015.

the draft is designed to balance the comp to help out the teams that are struggling.

Brisbane deserve the number 1 pick and almost got it with half of the essendon team out.

they are the team that is really being punished.

Pick 2 and 1 is a big deal.

you could say every team that would have finished under essendon is disadvantaged.

its not further punishment taking away their 1st pick, its giving them the actual compensation (draft pick) for their squads strengh.

does anyone think that they need pick 1 more then brisbane do?

if the response is well they lost players so that balances it out, whos fault is that really?

also they also got to blood youngsters which is another positive. 
Logged
iZander
Bench Steward
*
Offline Offline



GUN

« Reply #82 on: August 31, 2016, 12:37:04 PM »

ok so im anti bombers but clearly they deserve the pick where they finished on the ladder in 2015.

the draft is designed to balance the comp to help out the teams that are struggling.

Brisbane deserve the number 1 pick and almost got it with half of the essendon team out.

they are the team that is really being punished.

Pick 2 and 1 is a big deal.

you could say every team that would have finished under essendon is disadvantaged.

its not further punishment taking away their 1st pick, its giving them the actual compensation (draft pick) for their squads strengh.

does anyone think that they need pick 1 more then brisbane do?

if the response is well they lost players so that balances it out, whos fault is that really?

also they also got to blood youngsters which is another positive.

Dont think anyone questions Brisbane need pick 1 more, however i think everyone understands why the bombers get pick one. Cant just keep going along making rules, if it was going to happen they should have said at the start of the year which pick the bombers would get.
Logged
Holz
2017 WXV PremIEr
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



Dublin "Pride In Excellence"

« Reply #83 on: September 05, 2016, 10:45:19 AM »

ok so im anti bombers but clearly they deserve the pick where they finished on the ladder in 2015.

the draft is designed to balance the comp to help out the teams that are struggling.

Brisbane deserve the number 1 pick and almost got it with half of the essendon team out.

they are the team that is really being punished.

Pick 2 and 1 is a big deal.

you could say every team that would have finished under essendon is disadvantaged.

its not further punishment taking away their 1st pick, its giving them the actual compensation (draft pick) for their squads strengh.

does anyone think that they need pick 1 more then brisbane do?

if the response is well they lost players so that balances it out, whos fault is that really?

also they also got to blood youngsters which is another positive.

Dont think anyone questions Brisbane need pick 1 more, however i think everyone understands why the bombers get pick one. Cant just keep going along making rules, if it was going to happen they should have said at the start of the year which pick the bombers would get.

agreed they really should have announced it at the start of the year it is unfair to Brissy freo gc carlton

they should give the other 17 teams a priority pick at the start of the draft :P

Logged
iZander
Bench Steward
*
Offline Offline



GUN

« Reply #84 on: September 05, 2016, 10:53:04 AM »

ok so im anti bombers but clearly they deserve the pick where they finished on the ladder in 2015.

the draft is designed to balance the comp to help out the teams that are struggling.

Brisbane deserve the number 1 pick and almost got it with half of the essendon team out.

they are the team that is really being punished.

Pick 2 and 1 is a big deal.

you could say every team that would have finished under essendon is disadvantaged.

its not further punishment taking away their 1st pick, its giving them the actual compensation (draft pick) for their squads strengh.

does anyone think that they need pick 1 more then brisbane do?

if the response is well they lost players so that balances it out, whos fault is that really?

also they also got to blood youngsters which is another positive.

Dont think anyone questions Brisbane need pick 1 more, however i think everyone understands why the bombers get pick one. Cant just keep going along making rules, if it was going to happen they should have said at the start of the year which pick the bombers would get.

agreed they really should have announced it at the start of the year it is unfair to Brissy freo gc carlton

they should give the other 17 teams a priority pick at the start of the draft :P
how its unfair on 4 teams is beyond me, Bombers finished 15th last year then lost carlisle....

Pick 4 would be the minimum pick they'd of got.
Logged
Holz
2017 WXV PremIEr
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



Dublin "Pride In Excellence"

« Reply #85 on: September 06, 2016, 09:49:08 AM »

ok so im anti bombers but clearly they deserve the pick where they finished on the ladder in 2015.

the draft is designed to balance the comp to help out the teams that are struggling.

Brisbane deserve the number 1 pick and almost got it with half of the essendon team out.

they are the team that is really being punished.

Pick 2 and 1 is a big deal.

you could say every team that would have finished under essendon is disadvantaged.

its not further punishment taking away their 1st pick, its giving them the actual compensation (draft pick) for their squads strengh.

does anyone think that they need pick 1 more then brisbane do?

if the response is well they lost players so that balances it out, whos fault is that really?

also they also got to blood youngsters which is another positive.

Dont think anyone questions Brisbane need pick 1 more, however i think everyone understands why the bombers get pick one. Cant just keep going along making rules, if it was going to happen they should have said at the start of the year which pick the bombers would get.

agreed they really should have announced it at the start of the year it is unfair to Brissy freo gc carlton

they should give the other 17 teams a priority pick at the start of the draft :P
how its unfair on 4 teams is beyond me, Bombers finished 15th last year then lost carlisle....

Pick 4 would be the minimum pick they'd of got.

GC Brisbane Calrton finished below them in 2015. Freo only won 4 games this year.

It doesnt matter Essendon irrelevant regardless and GC get compo gifts.

GWS the real winner in the draft again.
Logged
iZander
Bench Steward
*
Offline Offline



GUN

« Reply #86 on: September 06, 2016, 09:59:11 AM »

ok so im anti bombers but clearly they deserve the pick where they finished on the ladder in 2015.

the draft is designed to balance the comp to help out the teams that are struggling.

Brisbane deserve the number 1 pick and almost got it with half of the essendon team out.

they are the team that is really being punished.

Pick 2 and 1 is a big deal.

you could say every team that would have finished under essendon is disadvantaged.

its not further punishment taking away their 1st pick, its giving them the actual compensation (draft pick) for their squads strengh.

does anyone think that they need pick 1 more then brisbane do?

if the response is well they lost players so that balances it out, whos fault is that really?

also they also got to blood youngsters which is another positive.

Dont think anyone questions Brisbane need pick 1 more, however i think everyone understands why the bombers get pick one. Cant just keep going along making rules, if it was going to happen they should have said at the start of the year which pick the bombers would get.

agreed they really should have announced it at the start of the year it is unfair to Brissy freo gc carlton

they should give the other 17 teams a priority pick at the start of the draft :P
how its unfair on 4 teams is beyond me, Bombers finished 15th last year then lost carlisle....

Pick 4 would be the minimum pick they'd of got.

GC Brisbane Calrton finished below them in 2015. Freo only won 4 games this year.

It doesnt matter Essendon irrelevant regardless and GC get compo gifts.

GWS the real winner in the draft again.
GWS will always be the winner mate!

hahahaha, bombers get minimum of N4, anything else would be unfair regardless of what happened this year. N4 would be fair, its where they finished last year :P Again it would of had to be decided before the year started and no1 predicted freo to be this bad.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 


FanFooty Contact Us About Us Advertising Site Map Copyright © 2004-2011 Paul Montgomery.
SMF 2.0 RC5 | SMF © 2014, Simple Machines