Will Danger win it?
Quote from: JBs-Hawks on August 30, 2016, 05:20:30 PMWill Danger win it?Id hope so or ill be calling for a recount
Quote from: iZander on August 30, 2016, 05:35:51 PMQuote from: JBs-Hawks on August 30, 2016, 05:20:30 PMWill Danger win it?Id hope so or ill be calling for a recountHe has done a remarkable job convincing everyone he is a nice person, but leading the stats? Someone had more ball in the AXV
I'd kinda like to just be able name teams in the format we do in all the other comps if that's a rule we can maybe change?
The teams on top are way way to far ahead for this to have a significant impact in the next few years, think a cap would be alot more effect. Having said that i think i dont care if there is nothing done tbh iZander
Quote from: iZander on August 30, 2016, 09:10:17 PMThe teams on top are way way to far ahead for this to have a significant impact in the next few years, think a cap would be alot more effect. Having said that i think i dont care if there is nothing done tbh iZanderNDT in worlds went from last to 6th largely due to priority picks. It can be doneA cap simply reduces depth. It doesn't reduce guns. Unless it is ridiculously tight. It does work but giving teams more to trade with is more effective
Quote from: Ricochet on August 30, 2016, 09:12:19 PMQuote from: iZander on August 30, 2016, 09:10:17 PMThe teams on top are way way to far ahead for this to have a significant impact in the next few years, think a cap would be alot more effect. Having said that i think i dont care if there is nothing done tbh iZanderNDT in worlds went from last to 6th largely due to priority picks. It can be doneA cap simply reduces depth. It doesn't reduce guns. Unless it is ridiculously tight. It does work but giving teams more to trade with is more effectiveThere was a cap in place in worlds....how do you know it wasnt because of the cap? They both obviously would help, to say which one was more effective seems difficult But i think the cap would be better in such a heavily uneven comp
Quote from: iZander on August 30, 2016, 09:17:40 PMQuote from: Ricochet on August 30, 2016, 09:12:19 PMQuote from: iZander on August 30, 2016, 09:10:17 PMThe teams on top are way way to far ahead for this to have a significant impact in the next few years, think a cap would be alot more effect. Having said that i think i dont care if there is nothing done tbh iZanderNDT in worlds went from last to 6th largely due to priority picks. It can be doneA cap simply reduces depth. It doesn't reduce guns. Unless it is ridiculously tight. It does work but giving teams more to trade with is more effectiveThere was a cap in place in worlds....how do you know it wasnt because of the cap? They both obviously would help, to say which one was more effective seems difficult But i think the cap would be better in such a heavily uneven comp Because I coach NDT lol. And it allowed us to trade for established players. With a cap, top teams simply trade away depth for picks or lesser depth and keep their guns. It does hurt them because injuries obviously happen, but in terms of their starting XV strength, it doesn't really impact them too much
Quote from: Ricochet on August 30, 2016, 09:21:24 PMQuote from: iZander on August 30, 2016, 09:17:40 PMQuote from: Ricochet on August 30, 2016, 09:12:19 PMQuote from: iZander on August 30, 2016, 09:10:17 PMThe teams on top are way way to far ahead for this to have a significant impact in the next few years, think a cap would be alot more effect. Having said that i think i dont care if there is nothing done tbh iZanderNDT in worlds went from last to 6th largely due to priority picks. It can be doneA cap simply reduces depth. It doesn't reduce guns. Unless it is ridiculously tight. It does work but giving teams more to trade with is more effectiveThere was a cap in place in worlds....how do you know it wasnt because of the cap? They both obviously would help, to say which one was more effective seems difficult But i think the cap would be better in such a heavily uneven comp Because I coach NDT lol. And it allowed us to trade for established players. With a cap, top teams simply trade away depth for picks or lesser depth and keep their guns. It does hurt them because injuries obviously happen, but in terms of their starting XV strength, it doesn't really impact them too muchBeing a coach of NDT doesnt mean you know who which factor it was that made the improve/decrease (yes, decrease, it makes top teams harder to improve), lets be honest it was a factor of both (and a factor of good trading if your scully trade is anything like your last years ones). To, which one was the strongest factor i dont think we will ever know. Plus if top teams have less depth than that depth is moved to other teams, which are then starters and helps even up the comp. Also it gives top teams a weakness, and they might rethink having a killer best 15 in search of depth since injuries do happen. Basically you nailed what a cap does above, which is why i think its better Its the quickest way to even up the comp imo