FanFooty   FanFooty
Australian Rules
Fantasy Football
Blog Forum App
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Name: Pwd: Login for:

    Advanced search
Home Help Login Register
+  FanFooty Forum
|-+  AFL fantasy competitions
| |-+  General Supercoach
| | |-+  Players & Trades in SC (Moderators: LF, LaHug, Ringo, PowerBug)
| | | |-+  2017 'Must Haves'
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Go Down Print
Author Topic: 2017 'Must Haves'  (Read 7427 times)
Mat0369
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



#shirleytempledidthis

« Reply #30 on: February 02, 2017, 05:42:22 PM »

Danger/Gawn prob 1 and 2
Fyfe
Myers
One of either Simpson or Docherty (Carlton will b 4-0, very soft draw to start)

Lol. Carlton will be lucky to win 4 games all year

Pity we don't play Richmond 18 times a year, we would be minor premiers if that was the case
Logged
GoLions
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



Better call Kenny Loggins

« Reply #31 on: February 02, 2017, 05:55:46 PM »

I can't wait until round 1 ;D
Logged
Chosen Won
Bootstudder
*
Offline Offline



Fantasy Coach

« Reply #32 on: February 02, 2017, 06:03:22 PM »

+1
Logged
Capper
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



CAPPERRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!

« Reply #33 on: February 02, 2017, 09:13:40 PM »

Sandi isnt a must have and has just done a calf. Not good for the injury prone ruckman

Must haves
Myers
Danger
Pendles
Logged
Jukes
Veteran Coach
****
Offline Offline


rosetta stone...

« Reply #34 on: February 02, 2017, 11:50:28 PM »

Curious, why are people legitimately saying Danger and Pendles are must haves? They aren't improving their average, they'll probably drop if anything.

Like I wouldn't say they're bad picks but must have is a bit extreme, I'd reserve that for the cheap/bargain/mid-priced guys who are bound to do great, awesome rookies, etc.
Logged
Bully
Veteran Coach
****
Offline Offline


Fantasy coach

« Reply #35 on: February 03, 2017, 12:20:35 AM »

Gawn was the first player I picked this year, followed by Dahlhaus.
Logged
RaisyDaisy
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



« Reply #36 on: February 03, 2017, 07:31:52 AM »

Curious, why are people legitimately saying Danger and Pendles are must haves? They aren't improving their average, they'll probably drop if anything.

Like I wouldn't say they're bad picks but must have is a bit extreme, I'd reserve that for the cheap/bargain/mid-priced guys who are bound to do great, awesome rookies, etc.

Fair points, but not having either as a captain option or seeing your opponent with both while you have neither wouldn't be great
Logged
LordSneeze
Hardened Coach
***
Offline Offline



Supercoach Stud on Heat

« Reply #37 on: February 03, 2017, 09:24:20 AM »

Curious, why are people legitimately saying Danger and Pendles are must haves? They aren't improving their average, they'll probably drop if anything.

Like I wouldn't say they're bad picks but must have is a bit extreme, I'd reserve that for the cheap/bargain/mid-priced guys who are bound to do great, awesome rookies, etc.

Fair points, but not having either as a captain option or seeing your opponent with both while you have neither wouldn't be great

Still not a must have though as you can realistically argue a starting mid without either.
Logged
gloryboy
Witches Hat Wrangler
*
Offline Offline


SC 2016 - 1393rd

« Reply #38 on: February 03, 2017, 10:30:48 AM »

Curious, why are people legitimately saying Danger and Pendles are must haves? They aren't improving their average, they'll probably drop if anything.

Like I wouldn't say they're bad picks but must have is a bit extreme, I'd reserve that for the cheap/bargain/mid-priced guys who are bound to do great, awesome rookies, etc.

Spot on

One persons lock or first picked doesnt make them everyone's must have.

And must have is about starting team,not final team
Logged
Jukes
Veteran Coach
****
Offline Offline


rosetta stone...

« Reply #39 on: February 03, 2017, 03:16:43 PM »

Curious, why are people legitimately saying Danger and Pendles are must haves? They aren't improving their average, they'll probably drop if anything.

Like I wouldn't say they're bad picks but must have is a bit extreme, I'd reserve that for the cheap/bargain/mid-priced guys who are bound to do great, awesome rookies, etc.

Fair points, but not having either as a captain option or seeing your opponent with both while you have neither wouldn't be great

Well if somebody's too cheap to pay up for one of those two, I'm sure they'd be able to pick and choose every week from Bont, Ablett, Gawn, Goldy, Titch, etc for captain. It's not like Danger and Pendles are that far ahead of the pack in scoring.
Logged
StuL
Training Scout
*
Offline Offline


Fantasy coach

« Reply #40 on: February 03, 2017, 11:57:27 PM »

Danger/Gawn prob 1 and 2
Fyfe
Myers
One of either Simpson or Docherty (Carlton will b 4-0, very soft draw to start)

Lol. Carlton will be lucky to win 4 games all year

Richmond will lose. Maybe 3-1. Some of the chicks are doubling up.
Logged
dmac07
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



Fantasy coach

« Reply #41 on: February 05, 2017, 11:46:32 AM »

My must haves

Danger, Gawn, Dahlhaus

My must haves IF named round 1

Myers, Scharenberg, D.Swallow
Logged
enzedder
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



SC Elxam Champs League (2013-2017)

« Reply #42 on: February 05, 2017, 12:12:50 PM »

Gawn and Dahlhaus.
Edit: and a juicy Dayne Beams.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2017, 02:14:52 PM by enzedder » Logged
StuL
Training Scout
*
Offline Offline


Fantasy coach

« Reply #43 on: February 13, 2017, 08:41:15 PM »

They've changed of course. No Simo or Docherty now.
Logged
Grufflez
Property Steward
*
Offline Offline



Gruffman's back baby!

« Reply #44 on: February 15, 2017, 12:13:11 AM »

For all those saying Sandilands isn't or wasn't a ''must have'' love the hindsight btw.
No one is a must have if injured before R1 so that's plain silly.

Now injury aside, tell me what other 300k player has a scoring history like Sandilands?
3rd man up gone so that's another win for the giant power ruckmen.
First 6 of 7 games at home so nearly no chance of rest early plus good scoring potential.

Now look yourself in the mirror and ask if Sandllands was fit and firing during the JLT leading into R1 if he wouldn't be a must have.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 


FanFooty Contact Us About Us Advertising Site Map Copyright © 2004-2011 Paul Montgomery.
SMF 2.0 RC5 | SMF © 2014, Simple Machines