FanFooty   FanFooty
Australian Rules
Fantasy Football
Blog Forum App
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Name: Pwd: Login for:

    Advanced search
Home Help Login Register
+  FanFooty Forum
|-+  AFL fantasy competitions
| |-+  General Supercoach
| | |-+  Supercoach Team Advice (Moderators: LF, LaHug, Ringo, PowerBug)
| | | |-+  Second edition - All Stars
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Second edition - All Stars  (Read 3165 times)
_wato
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2017, 12:48:23 AM »

Swallow down and Bob up would be good if enough mid rookies pop up

Looks good!

Exactly. SPP on field, Swallow downgrade and then Bob to Prem defender.

Prem Defender (95) + SPP (75) v Bob (80) + Swallow (90)

Gain a keeper and more cash generation.
Logged
Bully
Veteran Coach
****
Offline Offline


Fantasy coach

« Reply #16 on: March 03, 2017, 11:34:53 AM »

Swallow down and Bob up would be good if enough mid rookies pop up

Looks good!

Exactly. SPP on field, Swallow downgrade and then Bob to Prem defender.

Prem Defender (95) + SPP (75) v Bob (80) + Swallow (90)

Gain a keeper and more cash generation.

Not sure if SPP can average 75, not a noted possession gatherer.
Logged
Ringo
Moderator
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



2014 RDT Elxam m0nty medalist

« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2017, 02:23:57 PM »

Would not worry too much about Murphy when you look at Dogs draw.  Know projected scores are guess work but predicted average for first 10 Rounds is 103.1.  Even if drops to say 95 you would still take it.  He is priced at 72 so fair scope for price rise.
Logged
_wato
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



« Reply #18 on: March 04, 2017, 01:05:40 AM »

Would not worry too much about Murphy when you look at Dogs draw.  Know projected scores are guess work but predicted average for first 10 Rounds is 103.1.  Even if drops to say 95 you would still take it.  He is priced at 72 so fair scope for price rise.

It's the fact that I don't genuinely see him as a keeper. I've been pretty much against him all pre season.
Cool if he plays all the way until his bye to sideways trade him but I don't see it happening. Will only play 16-18 games.

So i need to find a way to not hurt the structure too much and upgrade him.. Don't know what use downgrading him would be as it means i miss out on Swallow or JOM in the midfield (as I'd have spare cash to upgrade them and dunno where else I'd spend that $$$$

so many decisions !!!!!
Logged
_wato
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



« Reply #19 on: March 04, 2017, 08:32:39 PM »

Just went Swallow -> Taranto, Murphy -> Howe
Logged
GoLions
Veteran Coach
****
Offline Offline



Better call Kenny Loggins

« Reply #20 on: March 04, 2017, 08:59:36 PM »

Just went Swallow -> Taranto, Murphy -> Howe
I like it (providing Taranto plays ofc)
Logged
eaglesman
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline


Fantasy coach

« Reply #21 on: March 04, 2017, 10:18:30 PM »

Just went Swallow -> Taranto, Murphy -> Howe
I like it (providing Taranto plays ofc)

Mate I don't like Murphy whatsoever but change that back to what you had originally and juggle things around to get Murphy to someone else.

Just my opinion
Logged
GoLions
Veteran Coach
****
Offline Offline



Better call Kenny Loggins

« Reply #22 on: March 04, 2017, 10:39:08 PM »

Just went Swallow -> Taranto, Murphy -> Howe
I like it (providing Taranto plays ofc)

Mate I don't like Murphy whatsoever but change that back to what you had originally and juggle things around to get Murphy to someone else.

Just my opinion
Not a fan of Howe? Could push a 100avg this season i reckon, prefer him to Adams atm
Logged
_wato
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



« Reply #23 on: March 04, 2017, 11:29:40 PM »

Just went Swallow -> Taranto, Murphy -> Howe
I like it (providing Taranto plays ofc)

Mate I don't like Murphy whatsoever but change that back to what you had originally and juggle things around to get Murphy to someone else.

Just my opinion
Not a fan of Howe? Could push a 100avg this season i reckon, prefer him to Adams atm

That is my only issue with Howe. Him, Adams and Laird all with the same bye.
And I would choose Adams over him any day of the week. Also worried that I'll have too many Pies boys. Currently have 3 and will probably get Treloar/Pendles (whichever I don't start with) later on on the year as my 4th.
Also seriously considering not starting Pendles but I'll chicken. I just can't find the funds anywhere right now to do what I want.
Logged
eaglesman
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline


Fantasy coach

« Reply #24 on: March 05, 2017, 12:34:27 AM »

Just went Swallow -> Taranto, Murphy -> Howe
I like it (providing Taranto plays ofc)

Mate I don't like Murphy whatsoever but change that back to what you had originally and juggle things around to get Murphy to someone else.

Just my opinion
Not a fan of Howe? Could push a 100avg this season i reckon, prefer him to Adams atm

That is my only issue with Howe. Him, Adams and Laird all with the same bye.
And I would choose Adams over him any day of the week. Also worried that I'll have too many Pies boys. Currently have 3 and will probably get Treloar/Pendles (whichever I don't start with) later on on the year as my 4th.
Also seriously considering not starting Pendles but I'll chicken. I just can't find the funds anywhere right now to do what I want.

It's not that I don't like howe I just think there are better safer options at that upper price level.

As much as I love taranto(massive fan already the way he shrugged that big hit from Franklin and got back into it,WOW), you can't pick him over the security of swallow even with the price difference. I'm fine with picking Taranto in another position but downgrading swallow is not the answer given job security differences imo.

Yup downgrade pendles before swallow in this instance imo
Logged
enzedder
Seasoned Coach
****
Online Online



SC Elxam Champs League (2013-2017)

« Reply #25 on: March 05, 2017, 03:01:35 PM »

Swallow down and Bob up would be good if enough mid rookies pop up

Looks good!
Bob down and Swallow if you could... something could pop up... On second thoughts forget about Bob... Swallow looks a good pick.
Actually looks a really strong team. Same mids as me bar one. I have Bont, not Jelwood.
Strong fwds and backs.
Is Sandi a must? Maybe he is but if I bring him in I have a problem about what to do with 250-300k.
Logged
_wato
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



« Reply #26 on: March 05, 2017, 03:07:11 PM »

I've just moved Swallow out of the team and brought JOM to M8.

Super super strong mids now.
Logged
Grufflez
Property Steward
*
Offline Offline



Gruffman's back baby!

« Reply #27 on: March 05, 2017, 07:38:49 PM »

Swallow down and Bob up would be good if enough mid rookies pop up

Looks good!

Exactly. SPP on field, Swallow downgrade and then Bob to Prem defender.

Prem Defender (95) + SPP (75) v Bob (80) + Swallow (90)

Gain a keeper and more cash generation.

Not sure if SPP can average 75, not a noted possession gatherer.

I agree, don't think SPP will be the stud some are hoping for SC wise.
Logged
_wato
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



« Reply #28 on: March 13, 2017, 01:30:13 PM »

DEF: Adams, Laird, Howe, Marchbank, EVW, Hampton (Stewart, Otten)
MID: Dangerfield, Rockliff, Treloar, Fyfe, Watson, Beams, O'Meara, Swallow (SPP, Hibberd, Pickett)
RUC: Sandilands, Witts (Strnadica)
FWD: N Riewoldt, Dahlhaus, Higgins, Roughead, Nankervis, Taranto (Houston, Eddy)

$30k in the bank. Reasonably happy with this team. Any improvements?
Logged
Huttabito
Bench Steward
*
Offline Offline


Fantasy Coach

« Reply #29 on: March 13, 2017, 02:32:05 PM »

Love it Wato.

SandiWitts gives a lot of wiggling room to p*ss off these poor rookies.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 


FanFooty Contact Us About Us Advertising Site Map Copyright © 2004-2011 Paul Montgomery.
SMF 2.0 RC5 | SMF © 2014, Simple Machines