FanFooty   FanFooty
Australian Rules
Fantasy Football
Blog Forum App
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Name: Pwd: Login for:

    Advanced search
Home Help Login Register
+  FanFooty Forum
|-+  AFL fantasy competitions
| |-+  XVIIIs Competitions
| | |-+  Americas XVIII DreamTeam (Moderators: LF, Atto)
| | | |-+  America's DT XVIII: 2017/2018 Rule Change Discussion and Suggestions
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: America's DT XVIII: 2017/2018 Rule Change Discussion and Suggestions  (Read 332 times)
LF
Moderator
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



2016 m0nty Medallist DT - 29th Overall DT 2016

« on: July 06, 2017, 05:11:26 PM »

We are quickly coming up to the end of the season and if there are any rules changes or suggestions from anyone I'd like to get them done and voted on if needed asap especially anything to do with trading and drafting
So if anyone has any suggestions or wants to express interest in possible rules changes now is the time for coaches to bring it up and for everyone to discuss

2 Rules changes that were from last trade and draft period was the extension of final delistings and an increase of movements for trading along with on trades not counting to movements which I thought worked really well.
Logged
kilbluff1985
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2017, 08:14:06 PM »

a rule like in bxv if ur player gets injured early u get emergency score
Logged
LF
Moderator
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



2016 m0nty Medallist DT - 29th Overall DT 2016

« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2017, 07:42:14 PM »

So with trading this year would everyone like it so that we have the 20 movements with on trading not included for the first trade period and then with the 2nd one have another set of movements for that?
Or do we want to leave it as is
Logged
popedelio
Forward Coach
**
Offline Offline



Washington Senators

« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2017, 09:32:15 PM »

So with trading this year would everyone like it so that we have the 20 movements with on trading not included for the first trade period and then with the 2nd one have another set of movements for that?
Or do we want to leave it as is

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Think leave it as is
Logged
Nige
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



[sandstorm intensifies]

« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2017, 09:35:15 PM »

So with trading this year would everyone like it so that we have the 20 movements with on trading not included for the first trade period and then with the 2nd one have another set of movements for that?
Or do we want to leave it as is

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Think leave it as is
Logged
popedelio
Forward Coach
**
Offline Offline



Washington Senators

« Reply #5 on: August 03, 2017, 09:22:38 PM »

My request is the addition of dpp throughout the year. Not sure how this should be managed because it would cause more work for the admins, plus I don't always agree with what AFL Fantasy adds for dpp. I like UF's additions, they tend to seem more fair and realistic.
Logged
SydneyRox
Veteran Coach
****
Offline Offline



GOT Pillow Talk

« Reply #6 on: August 11, 2017, 12:09:25 PM »

My request is the addition of dpp throughout the year. Not sure how this should be managed because it would cause more work for the admins, plus I don't always agree with what AFL Fantasy adds for dpp. I like UF's additions, they tend to seem more fair and realistic.

I like it, but since we are a DT comp I think we stick with the AFL Fantasy changes.
Logged
popedelio
Forward Coach
**
Offline Offline



Washington Senators

« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2017, 11:38:30 AM »

My request is the addition of dpp throughout the year. Not sure how this should be managed because it would cause more work for the admins, plus I don't always agree with what AFL Fantasy adds for dpp. I like UF's additions, they tend to seem more fair and realistic.

I like it, but since we are a DT comp I think we stick with the AFL Fantasy changes.

Yer I agree but when certain players like Sidebottom and Sheed (many more, can't think of any of the top of my head) get forward status (or any other players getting different position) is a bit of a joke, as they clearly are midfielders and only play there. Where as on the other hand I have Tippa, who is clearly a forward but started the year as a defender. Would have liked to have played him in my forward line. Sort of depends how the admins want to go, and I'm happy to stay as is, just a suggestion and to create conversation.
Logged
nas
Gerard Healy
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



« Reply #8 on: August 13, 2017, 07:35:12 AM »

So with trading this year would everyone like it so that we have the 20 movements with on trading not included for the first trade period and then with the 2nd one have another set of movements for that?
Or do we want to leave it as is

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Think leave it as is

My request is the addition of dpp throughout the year. Not sure how this should be managed because it would cause more work for the admins, plus I don't always agree with what AFL Fantasy adds for dpp. I like UF's additions, they tend to seem more fair and realistic.

I like it, but since we are a DT comp I think we stick with the DT Positions.
« Last Edit: August 13, 2017, 10:09:57 AM by nas » Logged
GoLions
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



Get around the Kate Upton Cobras!

« Reply #9 on: August 13, 2017, 09:37:07 AM »

DT and AF are different though, dunno why anyone would want the AF changes :P
Logged
popedelio
Forward Coach
**
Offline Offline



Washington Senators

« Reply #10 on: August 13, 2017, 11:18:35 AM »

So with trading this year would everyone like it so that we have the 20 movements with on trading not included for the first trade period and then with the 2nd one have another set of movements for that?
Or do we want to leave it as is

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Think leave it as is

My request is the addition of dpp throughout the year. Not sure how this should be managed because it would cause more work for the admins, plus I don't always agree with what AFL Fantasy adds for dpp. I like UF's additions, they tend to seem more fair and realistic.

I like it, but since we are a DT comp I think we stick with the DT Positions.

::)
Logged
LF
Moderator
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



2016 m0nty Medallist DT - 29th Overall DT 2016

« Reply #11 on: August 13, 2017, 11:19:24 AM »

We use RDT not AF even tho the scoring is the same
Would be a lot of extra work on top of normal admin as well
And AF positions most of the time are complete bullshower

I was looking into using UF next season for ease of scores but it looks like I'll have to pay for it because certain things aren't included and not sure if our list sizes will fit either
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 


FanFooty Contact Us About Us Advertising Site Map Copyright © 2004-2011 Paul Montgomery.
SMF 2.0 RC5 | SMF © 2014, Simple Machines