FanFooty   FanFooty
Australian Rules
Fantasy Football
Blog Forum App
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Name: Pwd: Login for:

    Advanced search
Home Help Login Register
+  FanFooty Forum
|-+  AFL fantasy competitions
| |-+  XVs Competitions
| | |-+  World XVs
| | | |-+  WXV Archives
| | | | |-+  2017 (Moderators: Purple 77, Nige, ossie85)
| | | | | |-+  WXV Rules Discussion 2017
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37] 38 Go Down Print
Author Topic: WXV Rules Discussion 2017  (Read 17868 times)
Holz
2017 WXV PremIEr
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



Dublin "Pride In Excellence"

« Reply #540 on: January 29, 2018, 12:42:46 PM »

So once again the majority vote that the minority should get the say over the majority.



Logged
Torpedo10
Seasoned Coach
****
Online Online



2017 Rank: 22767

« Reply #541 on: January 29, 2018, 12:45:19 PM »

So once again the majority vote that the minority should get the say over the majority.


It sure is weird!
Logged
meow meow
Guest
« Reply #542 on: February 02, 2018, 04:51:29 PM »

So, 17 out of 18 teams have voted.

I didn't vote because I was told that we can't change shower until next year, when I protested about something.

Something like this...

2018 salaries
Average                       $10,059,444.44
MAX = Average +5%    $10,562,416.67
MIN = Average -15%    $8,550,527.78

WXV Club
New Delhi Tigers
Dublin Destroyers
Berlin Brewers
Beijing Thunder
Moscow Spetsnaz
Pacific Islanders
Christchurch Saints
Toronto Wolves
Seoul Magpies
New York Revolution
Cairo Sands
Cape Town Cobras
Buenos Aires Armadillos   
Tokyo Samurai
Mexico City Suns
London Royals
Rio de Janeiro Jaguars
PNL Reindeers
Current Cap
$11,082,000   
$11,017,000
$10,942,000
$10,887,000
$10,796,000
$10,750,000
$10,574,000
$10,554,000
$10,393,000
$9,930,000
$9,735,000
$9,406,000
$9,366,000
$9,231,000
$9,208,000
$9,153,000
$9,128,000
$8,918,000

CAP CHEAT!!!
CAP CHEAT!!!
CAP CHEAT!!!
CAP CHEAT!!!
CAP CHEAT!!!
CAP CHEAT!!!
CAP CHEAT!!!


Let's keep this fresh in the mind until next off season thanks folks.
Logged
Levi434
Witches Hat Wrangler
*
Offline Offline



Who will show up at WXVAN18?

« Reply #543 on: February 02, 2018, 04:55:24 PM »

Ban those cap cheats! Horrible and disgusting!
Logged
Holz
2017 WXV PremIEr
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



Dublin "Pride In Excellence"

« Reply #544 on: February 02, 2018, 04:59:32 PM »


I didn't vote because I was told that we can't change shower until next year, when I protested about something.


You want to remove all the retired guys, but you have all these rookies coming in who are valued at 100k but will score.

I guess if you want to do it that way then you could increase the number to 10% above cap if you do that.

2018 salaries
Average                       $10,059,444.44
MAX = Average +10%    $11,065,388.88
MIN = Average -15%    $8,550,527.78

WXV Club
New Delhi Tigers
Dublin Destroyers
Berlin Brewers
Beijing Thunder
Moscow Spetsnaz
Pacific Islanders
Christchurch Saints
Toronto Wolves
Seoul Magpies
New York Revolution
Cairo Sands
Cape Town Cobras
Buenos Aires Armadillos   
Tokyo Samurai
Mexico City Suns
London Royals
Rio de Janeiro Jaguars
PNL Reindeers
Current Cap
$11,082,000   
$11,017,000
$10,942,000
$10,887,000
$10,796,000
$10,750,000
$10,574,000
$10,554,000
$10,393,000
$9,930,000
$9,735,000
$9,406,000
$9,366,000
$9,231,000
$9,208,000
$9,153,000
$9,128,000
$8,918,000

CAP CHEAT!!!


Logged
Purple 77
Moderator
Seasoned Coach
*****
Offline Offline



CANNOT MISS!

« Reply #545 on: February 02, 2018, 07:35:18 PM »

Lol meow :P

But just to be clear, the trade vote always happens in December/January, and I only tacked on the Rookie Promotion thing because I forgot to do it in the last lot... or it didn't happen yet... one of those.
Logged
meow meow
Guest
« Reply #546 on: March 05, 2018, 12:15:47 PM »

So do we get 4 emergencies now or what?
Logged
Purple 77
Moderator
Seasoned Coach
*****
Offline Offline



CANNOT MISS!

« Reply #547 on: March 05, 2018, 12:40:49 PM »

So do we get 4 emergencies now or what?

You'll have to remind me with the context, but no? With a couple of long weekend exceptions.
Logged
meow meow
Guest
« Reply #548 on: March 05, 2018, 12:44:43 PM »

So do we get 4 emergencies now or what?

You'll have to remind me with the context, but no? With a couple of long weekend exceptions.

4 emergencies named in AFL squads now.
Logged
Ringo
Chat/forum mods
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



2014 RDT Elxam m0nty medalist

« Reply #549 on: March 05, 2018, 03:39:31 PM »

So do we get 4 emergencies now or what?

You'll have to remind me with the context, but no? With a couple of long weekend exceptions.

4 emergencies named in AFL squads now.
Fair question given the latest AFL Tweak.
Logged
Holz
2017 WXV PremIEr
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



Dublin "Pride In Excellence"

« Reply #550 on: March 05, 2018, 04:01:09 PM »

So do we get 4 emergencies now or what?

You'll have to remind me with the context, but no? With a couple of long weekend exceptions.

4 emergencies named in AFL squads now.
Fair question given the latest AFL Tweak.

4 emergency seems a no brainier. there are 4 positions and unless you have DPP players on your emergency bench your going to be leaving one position empty (most likely a ruck)




Logged
Purple 77
Moderator
Seasoned Coach
*****
Offline Offline



CANNOT MISS!

« Reply #551 on: March 05, 2018, 05:06:15 PM »

Oh I see.

Hmm, my gut reaction is no, but I could be swayed. I tend to think we play with 5 emergencies anyway, given our utility spots. I also think a 15-3 ratio compares with the new afl 22-4.

Teams rarely have a second ruck available, and if they do, well, put them in as an emergency I say. I'd also prefer to not have anymore rule changes for the time being.

So overall, I'd prefer no, but await the feel of the consensus
Logged
Holz
2017 WXV PremIEr
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



Dublin "Pride In Excellence"

« Reply #552 on: March 05, 2018, 05:11:56 PM »

Oh I see.

Hmm, my gut reaction is no, but I could be swayed. I tend to think we play with 5 emergencies anyway, given our utility spots. I also think a 15-3 ratio compares with the new afl 22-4.

Teams rarely have a second ruck available, and if they do, well, put them in as an emergency I say. I'd also prefer to not have anymore rule changes for the time being.

So overall, I'd prefer no, but await the feel of the consensus

Most teams have a handcuff.

So say your number 1 ruck is under a late withdrawal cloud or worse a unexpected late withdrawal. Its better to have your back up ruck at e4.

If no e4 thrn you need to sacrifice a mid, fwd or def.

Does it even have to go to a vote? I cant see why anyone would not want it. Dont other comps all have it?
Logged
iZander
Back Coach
**
Offline Offline



GUN

« Reply #553 on: March 05, 2018, 05:35:09 PM »

Oh I see.

Hmm, my gut reaction is no, but I could be swayed. I tend to think we play with 5 emergencies anyway, given our utility spots. I also think a 15-3 ratio compares with the new afl 22-4.

Teams rarely have a second ruck available, and if they do, well, put them in as an emergency I say. I'd also prefer to not have anymore rule changes for the time being.

So overall, I'd prefer no, but await the feel of the consensus

Most teams have a handcuff.

So say your number 1 ruck is under a late withdrawal cloud or worse a unexpected late withdrawal. Its better to have your back up ruck at e4.

If no e4 thrn you need to sacrifice a mid, fwd or def.

Does it even have to go to a vote? I cant see why anyone would not want it. Dont other comps all have it?
Yeah have 10 emergencies as far as im concerned, you dont wanna see donuts
Wont matter for Dillos though, we struggled naming 3 last year
Logged
GoLions
Master Coach
*****
Online Online



Get around the Kate Upton Cobras!

« Reply #554 on: March 05, 2018, 05:37:41 PM »

Oh I see.

Hmm, my gut reaction is no, but I could be swayed. I tend to think we play with 5 emergencies anyway, given our utility spots. I also think a 15-3 ratio compares with the new afl 22-4.

Teams rarely have a second ruck available, and if they do, well, put them in as an emergency I say. I'd also prefer to not have anymore rule changes for the time being.

So overall, I'd prefer no, but await the feel of the consensus

Most teams have a handcuff.

So say your number 1 ruck is under a late withdrawal cloud or worse a unexpected late withdrawal. Its better to have your back up ruck at e4.

If no e4 thrn you need to sacrifice a mid, fwd or def.

Does it even have to go to a vote? I cant see why anyone would not want it. Dont other comps all have it?
I change my vote to stick with 3 emergencies
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 35 36 [37] 38 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 


FanFooty Contact Us About Us Advertising Site Map Copyright © 2004-2011 Paul Montgomery.
SMF 2.0 RC5 | SMF © 2014, Simple Machines