FanFooty   FanFooty
Australian Rules
Fantasy Football
Blog Forum App
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Name: Pwd: Login for:

    Advanced search
Home Help Login Register
+  FanFooty Forum
|-+  AFL fantasy competitions
| |-+  General Supercoach
| | |-+  Players & Trades in SC (Moderators: LF, LaHug, Ringo, PowerBug)
| | | |-+  Which score to take?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Which score to take?  (Read 698 times)
Ringo
Moderator
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



2014 RDT Elxam m0nty medalist

« on: August 19, 2017, 08:26:17 AM »

The weekend has started with an average bench score,

Greenwood 90 dragged down with a couple of clangers in last 10 minutes bringing into doubt. Will Scooter score 90 against the Pies?
Logged
igotworms
Bootstudder
*
Offline Offline


Fantasy coach

« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2017, 08:38:29 AM »

Guess it depends on your opposition and the matchups? Scooter loves SS, with majority of his scores over 100 there. Yet to play at the G and with an average of 86.3 (83.6 last 5 rounds) I would go with the old bird in the hand philosophy. Not that it means anything, but his two low scores were at AO 46 and DS 44! With his bros out of the side, it seems he is finding more of the footy perhaps? A real 50/50 this one. Sorry for being so ambiguous!
I have my own conundrum. Do I take Lloyds 81 or go for gold with Scharenberg in the hope he scores higher? Has been good the past few weeks with scores of 82, 99, 86! Really need these little wins to get me over the line after I brought Neale in last week for Selwood and ........ well you know what happened then!
Logged
tkringle
Coach
***
Offline Offline


« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2017, 09:10:34 AM »

Guess it depends on your opposition and the matchups? Scooter loves SS, with majority of his scores over 100 there. Yet to play at the G and with an average of 86.3 (83.6 last 5 rounds) I would go with the old bird in the hand philosophy. Not that it means anything, but his two low scores were at AO 46 and DS 44! With his bros out of the side, it seems he is finding more of the footy perhaps? A real 50/50 this one. Sorry for being so ambiguous!
I have my own conundrum. Do I take Lloyds 81 or go for gold with Scharenberg in the hope he scores higher? Has been good the past few weeks with scores of 82, 99, 86! Really need these little wins to get me over the line after I brought Neale in last week for Selwood and ........ well you know what happened then!

Berg should see quite a bit of the ball in feelings forward line. Will he have to be more accountable with Goldsack out though? I would stick with Lloyds 81.

I've got a couple..

Shaw vs Berg?
Greenwood's 90 vs Dahl?

Logged
Blues Blues Blues
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



GUYS! I need more Cowbell!!!

« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2017, 09:52:57 AM »

Guess it depends on your opposition and the matchups? Scooter loves SS, with majority of his scores over 100 there. Yet to play at the G and with an average of 86.3 (83.6 last 5 rounds) I would go with the old bird in the hand philosophy. Not that it means anything, but his two low scores were at AO 46 and DS 44! With his bros out of the side, it seems he is finding more of the footy perhaps? A real 50/50 this one. Sorry for being so ambiguous!
I have my own conundrum. Do I take Lloyds 81 or go for gold with Scharenberg in the hope he scores higher? Has been good the past few weeks with scores of 82, 99, 86! Really need these little wins to get me over the line after I brought Neale in last week for Selwood and ........ well you know what happened then!

Berg should see quite a bit of the ball in feelings forward line. Will he have to be more accountable with Goldsack out though? I would stick with Lloyds 81.

I've got a couple..

Shaw vs Berg?
Greenwood's 90 vs Dahl?

Berg and Greenwood
Logged
wetDT
Bootstudder
*
Offline Offline


Fantasy coach

« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2017, 10:01:11 AM »

Greenswood 90 or dahl, nank or nroo
Logged
SilverLion
Bench Steward
*
Offline Offline


Fantasy Coach

« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2017, 10:05:57 AM »

Greenswood 90 or dahl, nank or nroo

Similar boat myself, Higgins vs. Nank vs. Dahl vs. Greenwood's 90.

Considering Dahlhaus in all honesty, only scored above 90 once in the last 7 weeks.
Logged
Jroo
Veteran Coach
****
Offline Offline



« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2017, 12:37:53 PM »

Greenswood 90 or dahl, nank or nroo
I had the same issue, apart from Nank.

I think Nroo could be set for a big one against the Roos, so benching Dahl his form has been pretty ordinary lately
Logged
shaker
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline


2017 SC rank 2970

« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2017, 01:23:57 PM »

I'm taking Greenwoods 90 and benching Nank so you can bet Nank will pull out a monster :P
Logged
Blues Blues Blues
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



GUYS! I need more Cowbell!!!

« Reply #8 on: August 19, 2017, 04:49:20 PM »

Bank Schaz 91?

Or play Wither or Ryan?
Logged
Ringo
Moderator
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



2014 RDT Elxam m0nty medalist

« Reply #9 on: August 19, 2017, 04:54:00 PM »

Would bank it can not see Withers or Ryan going much over if they do.
Logged
Blues Blues Blues
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



GUYS! I need more Cowbell!!!

« Reply #10 on: August 19, 2017, 05:58:47 PM »

Bank Schaz 91?

Or play Wither or Ryan?

My "zero" Connor Glass is now playing so can't loophole Schaz.

Who to play - Withers (at MCG v Demons) or Ryan (at Domain v Tigers)
Logged
SilverLion
Bench Steward
*
Offline Offline


Fantasy Coach

« Reply #11 on: August 20, 2017, 07:31:58 PM »

Was able to loop Gawn and Greenwood, free 12 points #littlewins
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 


FanFooty Contact Us About Us Advertising Site Map Copyright © 2004-2011 Paul Montgomery.
SMF 2.0 RC5 | SMF © 2014, Simple Machines