FanFooty   FanFooty
Australian Rules
Fantasy Football
Blog Forum App
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Name: Pwd: Login for:

    Advanced search
Home Help Login Register
+  FanFooty Forum
|-+  AFL fantasy competitions
| |-+  General Supercoach
| | |-+  Players & Trades in SC (Moderators: LF, LaHug, Ringo, PowerBug)
| | | |-+  2020 Player X v Player y
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14 Go Down Print
Author Topic: 2020 Player X v Player y  (Read 8714 times)
Money Shot
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



Titz Out For LeBois! Titz Out for LeBois!

« Reply #15 on: January 22, 2020, 04:02:17 PM »

Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
I like Coniglio and Laird. But like Olivier/Laird out of the above two.
Logged
Bluesman
Witches Hat Wrangler
*
Offline Offline



Fantasy coach

« Reply #16 on: January 22, 2020, 11:57:38 PM »

Gawn/Jelwood/Doedee
vs
Jacobs/Zerrett/Sicily
Logged
Bluesman
Witches Hat Wrangler
*
Offline Offline



Fantasy coach

« Reply #17 on: January 23, 2020, 12:04:48 AM »

Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?
Oliver & Laird. I'm not a huge fan of Cogs with their plethora of midfield options
Logged
Colley Dogs
Witches Hat Wrangler
*
Offline Offline


« Reply #18 on: January 25, 2020, 10:17:39 PM »

Oliver & Laird vs Coniglio & Lloyd?

Oliver & Laird

(Because of Oliver)
Logged
Edgeovertherest
Bootstudder
*
Offline Offline


Fantasy Coach

« Reply #19 on: January 26, 2020, 12:17:37 AM »

Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
 
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1
Logged
RaisyDaisy
Master Coach
*****
Offline Offline



« Reply #20 on: January 26, 2020, 12:41:10 AM »

Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
 
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1

Option 3: Macrae, Neale, Cripps, Danger, Oliver
Logged
Edgeovertherest
Bootstudder
*
Offline Offline


Fantasy Coach

« Reply #21 on: January 26, 2020, 12:49:06 AM »

Been swapping between these two midfields for ages and would like a second opinion...

Option 1: Fyfe, Kelly, Cripps, Titch, Danger

Option 2: Macrae, Neale, Dunkley, Titch, Oliver

Option 1:
+ Good Bye Structure overall
+ Makes it so I dont have to bring them in before they get injured
+ High Ceiling
+ Fun to watch players
- Injury prone
- Low Floor scoring
- Likely to drop in price due to variance
 
Option 2
+ High Floor
+ 22 Games across the board meaning sideways trade unlikely
+ Less Likely to drop in price
- Bye Structure not as ideal
- History not as established as option 1

Option 3: Macrae, Neale, Cripps, Danger, Oliver

Interesting... would like to know what you like about cripps, danger and oliver (macrae and neale I understand) vs Fyfe, Kelly, Dunkley and Titch. Injury worries maybe?
Logged
Southstorm
Coach
***
Offline Offline



the pride of tamworth

« Reply #22 on: January 27, 2020, 03:05:30 PM »

Titch has only just started running recently from what I gather and didn't take part in the match sim this week. Would not be planning for him round 1.
Logged
jvalles69
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



2015 AF Rank - 811 2016 AF Rank - 854

« Reply #23 on: January 29, 2020, 04:54:12 PM »

Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood
Logged
tommy10
Expert Coach
***
Offline Offline



« Reply #24 on: January 29, 2020, 06:31:11 PM »

Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood
Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.
Logged
eaglesman
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline


Fantasy coach

« Reply #25 on: January 29, 2020, 10:56:46 PM »

Walters v heeney
Logged
dylanclements
Witches Hat Wrangler
*
Offline Offline



« Reply #26 on: January 30, 2020, 10:20:28 AM »

Walters v heeney

I'm dealing with the same question. Right now I have Heeney, partly because of price. I am not at all confident this is the right decision!

I can't believe I'm saying it but Greene is worth a look for ~500k F3s too
Logged
SilverLion
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



'17 SC Rank - 2827, '18 - 4108

« Reply #27 on: January 30, 2020, 10:54:08 AM »

Walters v heeney

I'm dealing with the same question. Right now I have Heeney, partly because of price. I am not at all confident this is the right decision!

I can't believe I'm saying it but Greene is worth a look for ~500k F3s too
I'd be going Greenwood ahead of those 3 personally.
Logged
jvalles69
Seasoned Coach
****
Offline Offline



2015 AF Rank - 811 2016 AF Rank - 854

« Reply #28 on: January 30, 2020, 11:00:37 AM »

Neale & Steven

Vs

Sloane & Greenwood
Steven hurt his calf yesterday so would keep an eye on him. Go for Dev if you dont have him.

Got Dev at F4 already.
Logged
dylanclements
Witches Hat Wrangler
*
Offline Offline



« Reply #29 on: January 30, 2020, 12:49:10 PM »

I'd be going Greenwood ahead of those 3 personally.

I don't love this one personally. Greenwood has averaged 85 in his three seasons and managed to break 100 three times last season. True that more time in the guts could help him but the upside surely isn't huge and I'd be predicting pretty close to 85 again.

Greene averaged 94, finishing last season with six straight 100s, two of which were over 130.

Heeney averaged 94, finishing last season with 5 100s from his last 9.

I'm going with if I remember Holz's theory that someone who scores well staying on the park is a better gamble than someone who scores less well lifting their numbers. Even if Greenwood adds 10ppg, he is just even with Greene and Heeney.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
 


FanFooty Contact Us About Us Advertising Site Map Copyright © 2004-2011 Paul Montgomery.
SMF 2.0 RC5 | SMF © 2014, Simple Machines